25-Nav-B5 Marine Control Systems · May 2015
Nivaar worked solution (AI-drafted; not reviewed by a licensed engineer)
Paper format: National Examination 98-Mar-B5 Fluid Machinery, May 2015 — closed book, three hours, 60 marks. Section A is calculative (Q1–Q5) and Section B is descriptive (Q6–Q8); the rubric asks for four questions of Section A plus two of Section B (six questions, each of equal value, 10 marks). All eight questions are solved in full as a study resource. General constants supplied with the paper: g = 9.81 m/s², patm = 100 kPa, pvapour = 2.34 kPa (20 °C), ρwater = 1000 kg/m³, ρair = 1.21 kg/m³ (15 °C).
Reference texts. S. L. Dixon & C. A. Hall, Fluid Mechanics and Thermodynamics of Turbomachinery, 7th ed.; R. K. Turton, Principles of Turbomachinery, 2nd ed.; H. Cohen, G. F. C. Rogers & H. I. H. Saravanamuttoo, Gas Turbine Theory, 6th ed.; R. W. Fox, A. T. McDonald & P. J. Pritchard, Introduction to Fluid Mechanics, 8th ed.
Question text not reproduced: the examination questions are © Engineers and Geoscientists BC. Open the official past paper (linked at the top of this page) to read the question, then follow the worked solution below.
Given. A 50 %-reaction free-turbine first stage on a twin-shaft industrial gas turbine.
| Stator angles α0/α1 | 30° / 60° |
| Rotor angles β1/β2 | 30° / 60° |
| Tip / root diameter | 1500 mm / 1050 mm |
| Speed | 3000 rev/min |
| Exhaust cp | 1.148 kJ/kg°C |
| Exhaust flow / power (half of combined) | 139 kg/s / 30.43 MW |
Find. Mean blade speed, the velocity triangle, gas velocities, power by two methods and the discrepancy.
Approach. Take the mean-diameter blade speed, exploit the symmetry of a 50 %-reaction stage to fix the axial velocity from $U=C_a(\tan\alpha_1-\tan\beta_1)$, then compute the Euler work and compare with the enthalpy-drop power.
The point of parts (d)–(f) is the deliberate discrepancy: the velocity-triangle calculation for the assumed number of stages under-predicts the power because the real machine extracts the full enthalpy drop from inlet (682°C) to exhaust (483°C), whereas the idealised triangles capture only the whirl change at the assumed stage loading. The enthalpy-drop method, which does not depend on the blade geometry, agrees with the nameplate 30.4 MW and is the reliable figure.
| Quantity | Value |
|---|---|
| (a) Mean blade speed | 200.3 m/s |
| (c) C1 / W1 / Ca | 346.9 / 200.3 / 173.4 m/s |
| (d) Power from velocities (3 stages) | 16.7 MW |
| (e) Power from ΔT | 31.8 MW |
| (f) Specified output | 30.4 MW |