NivaarExam PrepOfficial exam papers ↗

25-Nav-B5 Marine Control Systems · December 2017

Question 4 of 8: Pump Design

Nivaar worked solution (AI-drafted; not reviewed by a licensed engineer)

Notes on this paper

Paper format. 98-Mar-B5 Fluid Machinery, National Examinations December 2017 — three hours, closed book. Section A is calculative (Questions 1–5) and Section B descriptive (Questions 6–8); the rubric asks for four of Section A and two of Section B, six questions of ten marks each for a sixty-mark paper. Reference data for individual questions are supplied as Attachments (pages 10–17) and a general nomenclature/constants/equations sheet occupies pages 18–22. All eight questions are solved here, because the set is a study resource rather than a timed attempt.

Reference texts. S. L. Dixon & C. A. Hall, Fluid Mechanics and Thermodynamics of Turbomachinery, 7th ed.; R. K. Turton, Principles of Turbomachinery, 2nd ed.; H. Cohen, G. F. C. Rogers & H. I. H. Saravanamuttoo, Gas Turbine Theory, 6th ed.; F. M. White, Fluid Mechanics, 8th ed.; R. W. Fox, A. T. McDonald & P. J. Pritchard, Introduction to Fluid Mechanics, 9th ed.; Y. A. Çengel & M. A. Boles, Thermodynamics: An Engineering Approach, 9th ed. Constants are those printed on page 19 of the paper (g = 9.81 m/s², ρwater = 1000 kg/m³, ρair = 1.21 kg/m³ at 15 °C and 1.19 kg/m³ at 20 °C, cp = 1.005 kJ/kg°C, cv = 0.718 kJ/kg°C, patm = 100 kPa, pvapour = 1.71 kPa at 15 °C). Every reference equation quoted below is one of those printed on pages 20–22, and is identified as such where it is first used.

Subject note. Although this paper is listed under “Marine Control Systems”, page 1 of the examination itself reads 98-MAR-B5, FLUID MACHINERY, and every question is a turbomachine question with zero marine-control-systems content. The solutions below answer the paper as printed, citing turbomachinery texts rather than any control-systems reference. The three Canadian hydro stations named in Questions 1 and 2 (Mactaquac, Churchill Falls) are used by the examiner as settings for stated “hypothetical measurements”; the numbers solved here are the paper's, not plant records.

Question 4: Pump Design (10 marks)

Question text not reproduced: the examination questions are © Engineers and Geoscientists BC. Open the official past paper (linked at the top of this page) to read the question, then follow the worked solution below.

Given. Preliminary geometry and duty of a centrifugal water pump:

QuantitySymbolValue
Impeller inlet radiusr1100 mm
Impeller outlet radiusr2180 mm
Inlet passage width (axial)b150 mm
Outlet passage width (axial)b230 mm
Rotational speedN1720 rev/min
Volume flowQ0.25 m³/s
Delivery headH40 m
Water densityρ1000 kg/m³

Find. Ideal shaft power and torque, the blade speeds and radial velocities at both stations, the outlet whirl implied by the duty head, and the two blade angles taken from velocity diagrams drawn to scale.

Approach. Power from P = ρgQH and torque from P = 2πNτ (both page 21–22); kinematics from VB = ωr and continuity through the cylindrical periphery; then Euler's pump equation with zero inlet whirl for the outlet tangential velocity, which closes both triangles and delivers the blade angles.

Impeller INLET (r(1) = 100 mm)V(1) = 7.96 m/sW(1) = 19.69 m/sV(B1) = 18.01 m/sbeta(1) = 23.8 degV(1T) = 0: pure radial inlet, so V(1) = V(1R)Impeller OUTLET (r(2) = 180 mm)V(2) = 14.17 m/sW(2) = 21.61 m/sV(B2) = 32.42 m/s19.9 degV(2T) = 12.10 m/s, V(2R) = 7.37 m/s, alpha(2) = 31.3 degScale 10 mm = 5 m/s (the minimum the paper allows). Blue = absolute water velocity,red = relative (blade-fixed) velocity, green = blade velocity; the dashed vertical is the radial component.Both relative vectors lean backwards against the rotation: the blades are backward-curved, andbeta(2) = 19.9 deg holds V(2T) = 12.10 m/s far below V(B2) = 32.42 m/s.
Inlet and outlet velocity triangles for the impeller, drawn to a common scale of 10 mm = 5 m/s. The relative vectors lean backwards against the direction of rotation at both stations, which is what a backward-curved impeller looks like.
  1. Part (a) — ideal power. Under ideal (frictionless) conditions all the shaft power ends up as water power, so page 21's P = ρgQH applies directly: $$P=1000\times 9.81\times 0.25\times 40=98\,100\ \text{W}=\boxed{98.1\ \text{kW}}$$ A real pump of this duty would draw perhaps 120 kW; the question deliberately strips the losses out so that the kinematics can be isolated.
  2. Part (b) — shaft torque. Page 22 gives P = 2πNτ with N in rev/s, which is the same as P = ωτ. The angular speed is $$\omega=\frac{2\pi N}{60}=\frac{2\pi(1720)}{60}=180.1\ \text{rad/s}$$ so $$\tau=\frac{P}{\omega}=\frac{98\,100}{180.1}=\boxed{544.6\ \text{N}\!\cdot\!\text{m}}$$
  3. Part (c) — blade tangential velocities. The blade speed at any radius is simply ωr: $$V_{B1}=180.1\times 0.100=\boxed{18.01\ \text{m/s}},\qquad V_{B2}=180.1\times 0.180=\boxed{32.42\ \text{m/s}}$$
  4. Part (d) — radial (through-flow) velocities. Neglecting blade thickness, the whole flow crosses a cylindrical surface of area 2πrb at each station: $$V_{1R}=\frac{Q}{2\pi r_1b_1}=\frac{0.25}{2\pi(0.100)(0.050)}=\frac{0.25}{0.03142} =\boxed{7.96\ \text{m/s}}$$ $$V_{2R}=\frac{Q}{2\pi r_2b_2}=\frac{0.25}{2\pi(0.180)(0.030)}=\frac{0.25}{0.03393} =\boxed{7.37\ \text{m/s}}$$ The passage width is tapered from 50 mm to 30 mm precisely so that the radial velocity stays nearly constant as the radius grows; a designer aims for this because a decelerating radial component inside the impeller promotes separation. Note the area must be the cylindrical periphery 2πrb, never a disc area.
  5. Part (e) — outlet tangential velocity from the duty head. Euler's pump equation with no inlet whirl (V1T = 0, the pure radial inlet the question specifies) reduces to $$gH=V_{B2}V_{2T}\qquad\Longrightarrow\qquad V_{2T}=\frac{gH}{V_{B2}}=\frac{9.81\times 40}{32.42}=\boxed{12.10\ \text{m/s}}$$ As a check on parts (a), (b) and (e) together, the page-22 hydraulic torque τ = ρQ(r2V2T − r1V1T) gives 1000(0.25)(0.180 × 12.10) = 544.6 N·m, identical to part (b) — the two routes through the problem agree exactly.
  6. Part (f) — close the triangles and read the blade angles. The blade angle is the angle of the relative velocity to the tangential direction, so at inlet, where the absolute velocity is purely radial, $$\beta_1=\tan^{-1}\!\left(\frac{V_{1R}}{V_{B1}}\right)=\tan^{-1}\!\left(\frac{7.96}{18.01}\right) =\boxed{23.8^{\circ}}$$ and at outlet the relative tangential component is what the blade fails to impart, VB2 − V2T = 32.42 − 12.10 = 20.32 m/s, giving $$\beta_2=\tan^{-1}\!\left(\frac{V_{2R}}{V_{B2}-V_{2T}}\right) =\tan^{-1}\!\left(\frac{7.37}{20.32}\right)=\boxed{19.9^{\circ}}$$ For completeness the diagram also fixes the absolute discharge: V2 = √(12.10² + 7.37²) = 14.17 m/s at α2 = 31.3° to the tangential, and the relative velocities are 19.69 m/s at inlet and 21.61 m/s at outlet. Both blade angles are well under 90°, so the impeller is backward-curved — the standard choice, because it gives a falling head-capacity characteristic and a brake power that does not run away at high flow.
QuantitySymbolResult
(a) Ideal powerP98.1 kW
(b) Shaft torqueτ544.6 N·m
(c) Inlet blade speedVB118.01 m/s
(c) Outlet blade speedVB232.42 m/s
(d) Inlet radial velocityV1R7.96 m/s
(d) Outlet radial velocityV2R7.37 m/s
(e) Outlet tangential velocityV2T12.10 m/s
(f) Inlet blade angleβ123.8°
(f) Outlet blade angleβ219.9°
(f) Absolute discharge velocityV214.17 m/s at α2 = 31.3°
(f) Relative velocitiesW1, W219.69 m/s, 21.61 m/s
Check: this is the ideal (Euler) impeller. The head used in part (e) is the delivery head, so the blade angles above are those an infinitely-bladed, loss-free impeller would need. A real design must add slip — a finite blade count lets the flow under-turn, typically by ten to fifteen per cent of V2T — and hydraulic losses, so the manufactured outlet angle would be nearer 25° to 30° to deliver 40 m in service. The question asks for the preliminary analysis, which is the calculation above; the slip correction belongs to the next design step.