Nivaar worked solution (AI-drafted; not reviewed by a licensed engineer)
Notes on this paper
Paper format: National Examination 98-Mar-B5 Fluid Machinery, May 2017 — closed book, three hours, 60 marks. Section A is calculative (Q1–Q5) and Section B is descriptive (Q6–Q8); the rubric asks for four questions of Section A plus two of Section B (six questions, each of equal value, 10 marks). All eight questions are solved in full as a study resource. General constants supplied with the paper: g = 9.81 m/s², patm = 100 kPa, pvapour = 2.34 kPa (20 °C), ρwater = 1000 kg/m³, ρair = 1.21 kg/m³ (15 °C), cp,air = 1.005, cv,air = 0.718 kJ/kg·K.
Reference texts. S. L. Dixon & C. A. Hall, Fluid Mechanics and Thermodynamics of Turbomachinery (7th ed.); R. A. Sabersky, A. J. Acosta, E. G. Hauptmann & E. M. Gates, Fluid Flow: A First Course in Fluid Mechanics (4th ed.); H. Cohen, G. F. C. Rogers & H. I. H. Saravanamuttoo, Gas Turbine Theory; R. W. Fox, A. T. McDonald & P. J. Pritchard, Introduction to Fluid Mechanics.
Check: This paper, although listed under “Marine Control Systems”, is printed and headed “98-Mar-B5, Fluid Machinery” throughout, with zero marine-control-systems content (no PID loops, governors, or automation). It is solved here exactly as printed. Question 2's design method (annulus sizing from mass flow, 50% reaction symmetric velocity triangles) follows the standard preliminary axial-compressor design procedure of Dixon & Hall ch. 3–5; since no stage/compressor efficiency is supplied, the number of stages is obtained from the ideal (isentropic) overall temperature rise divided by the actual work done per stage — the standard simplification for this class of preliminary-design problem. Question 3 assumes zero exit whirl at the Francis runner outlet (design/best-efficiency condition), the standard assumption when no exit-blade data is given.
Approach. Use the isentropic temperature ratio $r_p^{(k-1)/k}$ with the component efficiencies to get the actual compressor-exit and turbine-exit temperatures, then form the net work per unit mass of gas (turbine work degraded by mechanical efficiency, less compressor work) and divide the fuel flow by the net work for the specific fuel consumption.
Compressor exit (points 1→2). The isentropic ratio is $r_p^{(k-1)/k}=12^{0.2857}=2.034$, so $T_{2s}=T_1\,r_p^{(k-1)/k}=288(2.034)=585.8\ \text{K}$. The compressor efficiency gives the actual exit temperature,$$T_2=T_1+\frac{T_{2s}-T_1}{\eta_c}=288+\frac{585.8-288}{0.86}=634\ \text{K}.$$
Turbine exit (points 3→4). The isentropic exhaust temperature is $T_{4s}=T_3/r_p^{(k-1)/k}=1350/2.034=663.7\ \text{K}$, and the turbine efficiency gives$$T_4=T_3-\eta_t(T_3-T_{4s})=1350-0.89(1350-663.7)=739\ \text{K}.$$$$\boxed{T_1=288,\;T_2=634,\;T_3=1350,\;T_4=739\ \text{K}}$$
Specific work per kg of gas. Take a basis of 1 kg of gas leaving the turbine. With an air/fuel ratio of 50 the gas is 50/51 kg air + 1/51 kg fuel, so the compressor (which handles only air) does $w_c=\tfrac{50}{51}c_p(T_2-T_1)=0.9804(1.005)(634-288)=341\ \text{kJ}$, while the turbine expands the full gas stream, $w_t=c_p(T_3-T_4)=1.005(1350-739)=614\ \text{kJ}$. The net work at the coupling (mechanical losses on the turbine output) is$$w_{net}=\eta_m w_t-w_c=0.98(614)-341=260\ \text{kJ per kg gas}.$$$$\boxed{w_{net}=260\ \text{kW}\!\cdot\!\text{s/kg}}$$
Specific fuel consumption. Per kg of gas the fuel burned is 1/51 = 0.01961 kg. Converting the net work to a kWh basis ($1\ \text{kWh}=3600\ \text{kJ}$),$$\text{SFC}=\frac{m_{fuel}}{w_{net}}\times3600=\frac{0.01961}{260}\times3600=0.271\ \text{kg/kWh}.$$$$\boxed{\text{SFC}=0.271\ \text{kg/kWh}}$$
Check: Only air property data (cp = 1.005 kJ/kg·K, k = 1.4) are supplied, so a cold-air-standard analysis is used throughout with the fuel mass accounted for via the air/fuel ratio. Using hotter combustion-gas properties (cp ≈ 1.15) would raise the turbine work modestly; the method is unchanged.