NivaarExam PrepOfficial exam papers ↗

24-Pet-A1 Principles of Stratigraphy and Sedimentation · May 2016

Question 9 of 20: Dunham/Embry-Klovan Carbonate Classification

Nivaar worked solution (AI-drafted; not reviewed by a licensed engineer)

Notes on this paper

EGBC National Exam — Petroleum Engineering, 98-Pet-A1 Principles of Stratigraphy & Sedimentation, 2016-May. 3 hours duration; closed book, no calculator permitted. The paper has two parts: Part 1 (Questions 1–12, Sedimentology and Sedimentary Processes – 10 marks each; answer any eight of the twelve, 80 marks total) and Part 2 (Questions 13–20, Stratigraphy and Sedimentary Basin Analysis – 10 marks each; answer any five of the eight, 50 marks total) – a 130-mark maximum (80 for Part 1 + 50 for Part 2).

Reference texts: Boggs, S. Jr., Principles of Sedimentology and Stratigraphy, 5th ed., Pearson (grain texture, sediment transport, bedforms, carbonate/evaporite systems, sequence stratigraphy, unconformities, stratigraphic principles); Tucker, M.E., Sedimentary Petrology, 3rd ed., Blackwell (carbonate classification, diagenesis, dolomitization); Nichols, G., Sedimentology and Stratigraphy, 2nd ed., Wiley-Blackwell (fluvial systems, sequence stratigraphy, stratigraphic units); Reading, H.G. (ed.), Sedimentary Environments: Processes, Facies and Stratigraphy, 3rd ed., Blackwell (facies models, trace fossils, coastal processes); Selley, R.C. & Sonnenberg, S., Elements of Petroleum Geology, 3rd ed., Academic Press (source rocks, basin classification, reservoir quality); International Commission on Stratigraphy, International Chronostratigraphic Chart (geological time scale).

Question 9: Dunham/Embry-Klovan Carbonate Classification (10 marks)

Question text not reproduced: the examination questions are © Engineers and Geoscientists BC. Open the official past paper (linked at the top of this page) to read the question, then follow the worked solution below.

Dunham's (1962) scheme classifies carbonate rocks by depositional texture – mud content, grain support and whether original components were organically bound – rather than by grain composition. Embry & Klovan (1971/72) extended it to name coarse (>2 mm) allochem fabrics and to subdivide the boundstone category by binding mechanism.

Dunham (1962) classification, extended by Embry & Klovan (1971/72)
TermSupport / fabricDistinguishing feature
MudstoneMud-supported<10% grains – almost pure lime mud
WackestoneMud-supported>10% grains, but grains "float" within a load-bearing lime-mud matrix
PackstoneGrain-supportedGrains touch and form the load-bearing framework, but lime mud still fills the intergranular pores
GrainstoneGrain-supportedNo lime-mud matrix – pores are empty or cement-filled; indicates thorough winnowing
Floatstone (Embry & Klovan)Mud-supported, coarse>10% grains coarser than 2 mm, "floating" in a finer (mud or grain) matrix
Rudstone (Embry & Klovan)Grain-supported, coarseGrain-supported fabric of allochems coarser than 2 mm
Bafflestone (Embry & Klovan)Organically boundSediment baffled/trapped in place by upright, branching or stalk-like organisms
Bindstone (Embry & Klovan)Organically boundSediment bound in place by encrusting/laminar organisms (e.g., algal mats)
Framestone (Embry & Klovan)Organically boundRigid, in-place skeletal framework built by colonial organisms (corals, stromatoporoids, rudists)