24-Pet-A3 Fundamental Reservoir Engineering · December 2018
Question 6 of 7: Combination Gas-Cap/Oil-Zone Material Balance
Nivaar worked solution (AI-drafted; not reviewed by a licensed engineer)
Notes on this paper
17-Pet-A3 — Fundamental Reservoir Engineering · National Exams, December 2018 · 3 hours, closed book, approved Casio/Sharp calculator only · five (5) questions constitute a complete exam paper (the first five as they appear in the answer book are marked), all questions equal value, all parts of a multipart question equal weight.
Reference texts: Craft, B.C. & Hawkins, M.F., Applied Petroleum Reservoir Engineering, 3rd ed. (material balance, well testing, relative permeability, Darcy flow); Ahmed, T., Reservoir Engineering Handbook, 5th ed. (material balance, transient well testing, gas PVT, decline-curve analysis); Lyons, W.C. (ed.), Standard Handbook of Petroleum and Natural Gas Engineering, 3rd ed.; McCain, W.D., The Properties of Petroleum Fluids, 3rd ed. (PVT properties, Z-factor correlations).
Question 6: Combination Gas-Cap/Oil-Zone Material Balance (20 marks)
Given. Saturated reservoir with an existing gas cap; $m=V_{\text{gas cap}}/V_{\text{oil zone}}=1/3$ (oil zone is 3× the gas cap); $A=400$ acres, $\phi=0.17$, $S_{gi}=0$ (oil zone), $S_{wi}=0.20$ (both zones), $p_i=3400$ psia, $T=160^\circ\text{F}=620^\circ\text{R}$, $B_{oi}=1.33$ bbl/STB, $B_{o}=1.25$ bbl/STB at 2800 psia, $W_e=1$ MMbbl, $N_p=2$ MMSTB, $G_p=2.6$ MMMSCF, $Z=1-0.0001p$, $R_{so}=0.2p$; no water production or rock/water-compressibility data given (both taken as negligible).
Find. Original gas in place $G$ and thickness of the oil zone $h_{\text{oil}}$.
Approach. Because the reservoir is saturated with an existing gas cap, $B_{ti}=B_{oi}$ and $R_{soi}=0.2p_i$ by the given correlation. Solve the combined gas-cap/oil-zone material balance for $N$ (dropping the negligible rock/water-expansion term), get the gas cap's reservoir volume from $mNB_{ti}$ and hence $G$ from $B_{gi}$, then get the oil-zone net thickness from the standard volumetric equation using $N$ and $B_{oi}$.
Fig. 1: schematic cross-section — gas cap over an oil zone over the aquifer, with $m=1/3$ from the given 3:1 oil-zone-to-gas-cap volume ratio.
Solution GOR and gas properties at each pressure. $R_{soi}=0.2(3400)=680$, $R_{so}=0.2(2800)=560\ \text{SCF/STB}$. $Z_i=1-0.0001(3400)=0.66$, $Z=1-0.0001(2800)=0.72$. $B_g=0.02827\,ZT/p$ (ft³/SCF), converted to bbl/SCF ($\div5.615$): $B_{gi}=0.02827(0.66)(620)/3400/5.615$, so $\boxed{B_{gi}=6.06\times10^{-4}\ \text{bbl/SCF}}$; $B_g=0.02827(0.72)(620)/2800/5.615$, so $\boxed{B_g=8.03\times10^{-4}\ \text{bbl/SCF}}$.
Two-phase FVF. $B_{ti}=B_{oi}=1.33$ bbl/STB (saturated at $t=0$, no free gas has yet evolved from the oil column). $B_t=B_o+B_g(R_{soi}-R_{so})=1.25+8.03\times10^{-4}(680-560)$, so $\boxed{B_t=1.3463\ \text{bbl/STB}}$.
Cumulative producing GOR. $R_p=G_p/N_p=2.6\times10^9/2\times10^6$, so $\boxed{R_p=1300\ \text{SCF/STB}}$.
Oil in place, $N$. With the rock/water-expansion term dropped (no $c_w,c_f$ given), the combination material balance reduces to $N(B_t-B_{ti})+Nm\dfrac{B_{ti}}{B_{gi}}(B_g-B_{gi})+W_e=N_p[B_t+B_g(R_p-R_{soi})]$. Substituting $m=1/3$: coefficient of $N$ is $(1.3463-1.33)+\tfrac13\left(\tfrac{1.33}{6.06\times10^{-4}}\right)(8.03\times10^{-4}-6.06\times10^{-4})=0.1603$; RHS $=2\times10^6[1.3463+8.03\times10^{-4}(1300-680)]-1\times10^6=2.688\times10^6$. So $N=2.688\times10^6/0.1603$, giving $\boxed{N=16.77\times10^{6}\ \text{STB}\ (16.77\ \text{MMSTB})}$.
Original gas in place. Gas-cap reservoir volume $=mNB_{ti}=\tfrac13(16.77\times10^6)(1.33)=7.44\times10^6$ bbl. $G=\dfrac{mNB_{ti}}{B_{gi}}=\dfrac{7.44\times10^6}{6.06\times10^{-4}}$, so $\boxed{G=1.227\times10^{10}\ \text{SCF}\ (12{,}271\ \text{MMSCF})}$.
Oil-zone net thickness. $N=\dfrac{7758\,A\,h\,\phi(1-S_{wi})}{B_{oi}}\ \Rightarrow\ h=\dfrac{NB_{oi}}{7758A\phi(1-S_{wi})}=\dfrac{16.77\times10^6(1.33)}{7758(400)(0.17)(0.80)}$, giving $\boxed{h_{\text{oil}}=52.9\ \text{ft}}$.
Check: the rock-and-water expansion term of the full material balance is dropped because no water or formation compressibility ($c_w$, $c_f$) is supplied by the question — standard practice when that data is genuinely absent, and consistent with this being a modest 600-psi pressure drop compared to the gas-cap and solution-gas expansion terms.