24-Pet-A4 Oil and Gas Well Drilling and Completion · May 2015
Question 3 of 5: Weighting Up Drilling Fluid with Barite
Nivaar worked solution (AI-drafted; not reviewed by a licensed engineer)
Notes on this paper
98-Pet-A4 — Oil and Gas Well Drilling & Completion · National Exams, May 2015 · 3 hours, open book, non-communicating calculator only · four (4) questions constitute a complete exam paper (the first four as they appear in the answer book are marked), all questions equal value — all five questions are solved below as a complete study resource.
Reference texts: Bourgoyne, A.T. Jr., Millheim, K.K., Chenevert, M.E. & Young, F.S., Applied Drilling Engineering, SPE Textbook Series (casing design, drilling hydraulics, bit hydraulics, drilling-fluid density control, well control); Rabia, H., Well Engineering & Construction (casing design methodology, well control practice); Alberta Energy Regulator, Directive 010: Minimum Casing Design Requirements (Canadian regulatory casing-design context).
Question 3: Weighting Up Drilling Fluid with Barite (equal value)
Given. $V_f=2{,}000$ bbl (fixed tank capacity); $\rho_o=10.0$ ppg; $\rho_f=11.0$ ppg; API Barite $SG=4.2$ (so $\rho_b=4.2(8.34)=35.03$ ppg); 1 sack $=100$ lb.
Find. The volume of old mud that must be discarded and the number of sacks of Barite required, so the final 2,000 bbl of mud is at 11.0 ppg.
Approach. Because the tank capacity is capped at the starting volume, adding barite (which occupies volume as well as adding weight) must be offset by first discarding some old mud. Write a combined mass balance and volume balance across the whole operation, in terms of the retained old-mud volume $V_r$ and the barite mass $m_b$, and solve them together.
Set up the mass and volume balances. Let $V_r$ = bbl of old mud retained (undiscarded) and $m_b$ = lb of barite added. Mass balance: $\rho_o(42V_r)+m_b=\rho_f(42V_f)$. Volume balance (barite is idealized as occupying a volume $m_b/\rho_b$): $42V_r+m_b/\rho_b=42V_f$.
Eliminate $V_r$ and solve for the barite mass. Substituting $42V_r=42V_f-m_b/\rho_b$ into the mass balance and solving for $m_b$: $$m_b=\dfrac{42\,V_f\,(\rho_f-\rho_o)\,\rho_b}{\rho_b-\rho_o}=\dfrac{42(2{,}000)(1.0)(35.03)}{35.03-10.0}$$ so $\boxed{m_b=117{,}562\ \text{lb}}$.
Convert to sacks. $m_b/100=1{,}175.6$ sacks; rounding up so the target density is at least met, $\boxed{1{,}176\ \text{sacks of Barite}}$.
Volume of old mud to discard. Barite's own idealized volume is $v_b=m_b/\rho_b=117{,}562/35.03=3{,}356.9$ gal $=79.9$ bbl. From the volume balance, $V_r=V_f-v_b=2{,}000-79.9=1{,}920.1$ bbl retained, so the volume discarded is $\boxed{V_d=V_f-V_r=79.9\ \text{bbl}}$ — exactly equal to the volume the barite itself occupies, which is what keeps the final volume at the 2,000 bbl tank limit.
Fig. 1 — Volume balance: discarding 79.9 bbl of old mud makes exactly enough room in the fixed 2,000 bbl tank for the barite added.
Check: barite's added volume is idealized as $m_b/\rho_b$ (its own bulk density), the standard simplification used in weight-material calculations — it ignores any small excess-volume/mixing effect, consistent with how this calculation is taught and examined.