NivaarExam PrepOfficial exam papers ↗

24-Pet-A6 Well Logging and Formation Evaluation · December 2019

Question 4 of 5

Nivaar worked solution (AI-drafted; not reviewed by a licensed engineer)

Notes on this paper

Reference texts: Craft, B.C. and Hawkins, M. (rev. Terry & Rogers), Applied Petroleum Reservoir Engineering, 3rd ed.; Ahmed, T., Reservoir Engineering Handbook, 5th ed.; Lyons, W.C. (ed.), Standard Handbook of Petroleum and Natural Gas Engineering, 3rd ed.

Question 4 (30 Marks)

Question text not reproduced: the examination questions are © Engineers and Geoscientists BC. Open the official past paper (linked at the top of this page) to read the question, then follow the worked solution below.

Given. A linear "shoestring" waterflood with explicit relative-permeability functions (no chart reading required). (the explicit text value $S_{wi}=0.30$ is used throughout, per the given rel-perm formulas.)

Given data
$W\times h\times L$300 × 20 × 1,000 ft$\phi$0.15
$S_{wi}$0.30$S_{orw}$0.20
$\mu_o,\ \mu_w$2.0, 1.0 cp$q_{inj}$350 bbl/day
0203040506070800.00.250.50.751.0Swf = 0.626Sw2 = 0.66Swi=0.30Water saturation, Sw (%)fw
Fig. Q4 – fractional-flow curve $f_w(S_w)$ with the Welge tangent from $S_{wi}$, marking the shock front $S_{wf}$ and the producing-well saturation $S_{w2}=0.66$.

Find. (a) $N_p$ at $S_{w2}=0.66$; (b) $W_p$ at the same condition; (c) areal sweep after 25,000 bbl injected.

Approach. Build the fractional-flow curve from the given relative-permeability functions, apply Welge's method (average saturation behind the front from the tangent slope at $S_{w2}$) for parts (a)–(b), and use the Buckley–Leverett frontal-advance relation for the shock front to answer the pre-breakthrough sweep in part (c).

  1. Fractional-flow function (no gravity, horizontal bed). $$f_w(S_w)=\frac{1}{1+\dfrac{\mu_w}{\mu_o}\dfrac{k_{ro}}{k_{rw}}}=\frac{1}{1+\dfrac12\dfrac{(1-S_{wD})^3}{S_{wD}^4}}$$ At $S_{w2}=0.66$: $S_{wD}=\dfrac{0.66-0.30}{1-0.20-0.30}=0.72$, giving $f_{w2}=0.9608$ and (by numerical differentiation of $f_w$) $\left.\dfrac{df_w}{dS_w}\right|_{0.66}=1.227$.
  2. Average saturation behind the front (Welge). $$\bar S_w=S_{w2}+\frac{1-f_{w2}}{\left(df_w/dS_w\right)_{S_{w2}}}=0.66+\frac{1-0.9608}{1.227}$$ $$\boxed{\bar S_w\approx0.692}$$
  3. Reservoir pore volume. $$V_p=\frac{(300)(20)(1{,}000)(0.15)}{5.615}\approx160{,}285\text{ bbl}$$
  4. Cumulative oil production at $S_{w2}=0.66$. $$N_p=V_p(\bar S_w-S_{wi})=160{,}285(0.692-0.30)$$ $$\boxed{N_p\approx 62{,}830\text{ STB}}$$
  5. Cumulative water production at the same condition. Material balance (water injected = water retained + water produced), using $Q_{iD}=1/f_w'(S_{w2})$ for the dimensionless cumulative injection: $$W_p=V_p\!\left[\frac{f_{w2}}{\left(df_w/dS_w\right)_{S_{w2}}}-(S_{w2}-S_{wi})\right]=160{,}285\left[\frac{0.9608}{1.227}-0.36\right]$$ $$\boxed{W_p\approx 67{,}828\text{ STB}}$$
  6. Shock-front saturation and areal sweep after 25,000 bbl injected. The shock (leading front) saturation $S_{wf}$ is found from the Welge tangent condition $f_w(S_{wf})/(S_{wf}-S_{wi})=(df_w/dS_w)_{S_{wf}}$, solved numerically: $S_{wf}\approx0.626$, giving $(df_w/dS_w)_{S_{wf}}\approx2.747$. In this linear, uniform-cross-section "shoestring" system the whole width is flooded uniformly, so the areal sweep efficiency equals the fractional distance the front has advanced, $x_{D}=(df_w/dS_w)_{S_{wf}}\,Q_{iD}$: $$Q_{iD}=\frac{25{,}000}{160{,}285}=0.1560\text{ PV}$$ $$x_D=2.747\times0.1560$$ $$\boxed{\text{Areal sweep}\approx 42.8\%\ (\text{pre-breakthrough; breakthrough occurs at }Q_{iD}=1/2.747=0.364\text{ PV})}$$
Question 4 – final results
QuantityValue
Average $S_w$ behind front, $\bar S_w$0.692
Cumulative oil production, $N_p$62,830 STB
Cumulative water production, $W_p$67,828 STB
Shock front saturation, $S_{wf}$0.626
Areal sweep after 25,000 bbl injected42.8%