Question 7 of 12: SNP Environmental Correction, Order of Magnitude
Nivaar worked solution (AI-drafted; not reviewed by a licensed engineer)
Notes on this paper
National Exams, 98-Pet-B1, Well Logging and Formation Evaluation — May 2014, 3 hours, closed book (calculators permitted), 12 questions, all marked, 100 marks total.
Reference texts: Bassiouni, Theory, Measurement, and Interpretation of Well Logs (SPE Textbook Series Vol. 4); Asquith & Krygowski, Basic Well Log Analysis, 2nd ed. (AAPG); Ellis & Singer, Well Logging for Earth Scientists, 2nd ed.; Schlumberger, Log Interpretation Charts / Log Interpretation Principles and Applications.
Question 7: SNP Environmental Correction, Order of Magnitude (7 marks)
Given. SNP (sidewall neutron porosity) reading φSNP=20% (assuming the standard 7⅞" borehole, fresh water 8.3 lb/gal mud, 75°F calibration conditions); actual hole = 6"; actual mud = 12 lb/gal barite, fresh-water base (≈83% water by volume per the correction chart); actual formation temperature = 175°F; actual formation pressure = 5200 psia.
Find. The order of magnitude of the correction the SNP surface panel applies to the 20% reading.
Approach. The SNP panel automatically applies two of the three environmental corrections from its own caliper and mud-weight input — borehole-diameter and mud-weight — reading them off the manufacturer's correction charts at φ=20%; the temperature/pressure correction is a separate, manually-applied chart reading, not something the panel itself corrects for.
Borehole-diameter correction (panel-applied). From the "Correction for 6" and 10" Diameter Boreholes" chart (computed from the caliper signal and automatically applied by the panel), at φ=20% derived assuming a 7⅞" hole, the 6" HOLE band reads
$$\Delta\phi_{bh}\approx +2.0\ \text{p.u.}$$
Mud-weight correction (panel-applied). From the "Correction for Weighted Muds" chart (also automatically applied by the panel), the 12 lb/gal barite mud (≈83% water by volume) band at φ=20% reads
$$\Delta\phi_{mud}\approx +1.6\ \text{p.u.}$$
Together, the correction the panel itself has already applied is
$$\Delta\phi_{panel}=\Delta\phi_{bh}+\Delta\phi_{mud}\approx 2.0+1.6=\boxed{3.6\ \text{p.u.}}$$
Temperature/pressure correction (NOT panel-applied). The "Correction for Temperature of 175°F" chart carries a separate "Combined Temperature and Pressure Corrections" curve (distinct from the wider "Temperature Correction Range" band, and with no "applied automatically by panel" label) — at φ=20% it reads
$$\Delta\phi_{T,P}\approx +0.5\ \text{p.u.}$$
This is a chart the log analyst applies by hand at the wellsite; it is the correction the panel does not make.
Substituting, the order of magnitude of the correction the SNP panel applies is a few porosity units — $\boxed{\approx 3\text{--}4\ \text{p.u.}}$ (2.0 p.u. from hole size + 1.6 p.u. from mud weight); a further ≈0.5 p.u. combined temperature/pressure correction must still be applied manually, giving a total environmental correction on the order of $\boxed{\approx 4\ \text{p.u.}}$ if the reader wants the fully-corrected porosity.
SNP environmental corrections at φSNP=20%
Correction
Applied by panel?
Magnitude
Borehole diameter (6")
Yes (from caliper)
+2.0 p.u.
Mud weight (12 lb/gal barite)
Yes
+1.6 p.u.
Panel-applied subtotal
—
≈ +3.6 p.u.
Combined temperature (175°F) & pressure (5200 psia)
No (manual chart)
+0.5 p.u.
Total environmental correction
—
≈ +4.1 p.u.
Check: the three correction magnitudes are read off analog Schlumberger charts with printed axis gridlines but no digit-level tick labels along the shaded correction bands; each value carries an estimated ±0.3–0.5 p.u. hand-reading uncertainty. The question explicitly asks only for the "order of magnitude," which these estimates satisfy.