Question 9 of 12: Water-Saturation Cutoff and Minimum Productive Resistivity
Nivaar worked solution (AI-drafted; not reviewed by a licensed engineer)
Notes on this paper
National Exams, 98-Pet-B1, Well Logging and Formation Evaluation — May 2016, 3 hours, closed book (approved calculators permitted), 12 questions, all of them marked, values shown per question. neutron and density tools, SP, caliper, Archie, and log crossplots. There is no natural-gas-engineering content in the paper. All twelve questions are answered below.
Reference texts: Bassiouni, Theory, Measurement, and Interpretation of Well Logs (SPE Textbook Series Vol. 4); Asquith & Krygowski, Basic Well Log Analysis, 2nd ed. (AAPG Methods in Exploration 16); Ellis & Singer, Well Logging for Earth Scientists, 2nd ed.; Schlumberger, Log Interpretation Charts / Log Interpretation Principles and Applications.
The exam supplies a formula sheet (page 15) and four chart attachments: an SNP borehole-size correction chart and a nonideal-shale-membrane SP departure chart (page 16), SNP mud-weight and temperature/pressure correction charts (page 17), and a water-oil relative permeability ratio chart plus the Schlumberger Rw-equivalent conversion chart (page 18). Every chart reading below is quoted with the reading tolerance it deserves.
Question 9: Water-Saturation Cutoff and Minimum Productive Resistivity (6 marks)
Find. (i) The water saturation $S_{w,cut}$ at which the well would produce a 30 % water cut, and (ii) the corresponding minimum productive true resistivity $R_{mp}$ — the deep-resistivity value below which the formation is not worth completing.
Approach. Invert the fractional-flow equation to convert the 30 % water cut into a relative-permeability ratio, read the saturation off the supplied $k_w/k_o$ chart, then substitute that saturation into Archie's saturation equation to obtain the resistivity cutoff.
Water-oil relative permeability ratio chart from attachment page 18, digitised. Entering at $k_w/k_o = 0.107$ gives the water-saturation cutoff of 39.4 %.
Write the fractional flow of water at reservoir conditions. Neglecting gravity and capillary terms, the ratio of volumetric rates from Darcy's law for two phases in the same rock is $q_o/q_w = (k_o/\mu_o)/(k_w/\mu_w)$, so
$$f_w = \frac{q_w}{q_w + q_o} = \frac{1}{1 + \dfrac{k_o}{k_w}\cdot\dfrac{\mu_w}{\mu_o}}$$
Solve for the relative-permeability ratio at the target water cut. Rearranging and substituting $f_w = 0.30$ and $\mu_w/\mu_o = 0.25$,
$$\frac{k_o}{k_w} = \frac{1}{\mu_w/\mu_o}\left(\frac{1}{f_w} - 1\right) = \frac{1}{0.25}\left(\frac{1}{0.30} - 1\right) = 4 \times 2.3333 = 9.333$$
so that
$$\frac{k_w}{k_o} = \frac{1}{9.333} = 0.107$$
Read the saturation from the relative-permeability chart. Entering the attachment chart on its logarithmic $k_w/k_o$ axis at 0.107 and dropping to the saturation axis,
$$\boxed{S_{w,cut} \approx 39\ \%\ \ (0.394)}$$
Above this saturation the water cut exceeds 30 %; below it the well produces acceptably dry oil.
Interpret the number. The wet-rock resistivity of this formation is $R_o = F R_w = 18 \times 0.045 = 0.81\ \Omega \cdot \text{m}$, so the cutoff sits at a resistivity index of $R_{mp}/R_o = 6.4$. Any interval whose deep resistivity reads below about 5.2 $\Omega \cdot \text{m}$ carries $S_w > 39\ \%$ and would come in above a 30 % water cut; intervals reading appreciably above it are the completion candidates.
Result
Value
Relative-permeability ratio at 30 % water cut, $k_w/k_o$
0.107
Water-saturation cutoff, $S_{w,cut}$
39 % (0.394)
Wet-rock resistivity, $R_o = F R_w$
0.81 $\Omega \cdot \text{m}$
Minimum productive resistivity, $R_{mp}$
5.2 $\Omega \cdot \text{m}$
Resistivity index at the cutoff, $R_{mp}/R_o$
6.4
Check: the saturation cutoff is a chart reading, digitised from the attachment at $S_w = 39.4\ \%$ with a tolerance of about $\pm 1.5$ saturation units; that band maps to $R_{mp}$ between roughly 4.8 and 5.7 $\Omega \cdot \text{m}$. Every step after the chart entry is exact arithmetic.