NivaarExam PrepOfficial exam papers ↗

24-Pet-B1 Natural Gas Engineering · May 2016

Question 9 of 12: Water-Saturation Cutoff and Minimum Productive Resistivity

Nivaar worked solution (AI-drafted; not reviewed by a licensed engineer)

Notes on this paper

National Exams, 98-Pet-B1, Well Logging and Formation Evaluation — May 2016, 3 hours, closed book (approved calculators permitted), 12 questions, all of them marked, values shown per question. neutron and density tools, SP, caliper, Archie, and log crossplots. There is no natural-gas-engineering content in the paper. All twelve questions are answered below.

Reference texts: Bassiouni, Theory, Measurement, and Interpretation of Well Logs (SPE Textbook Series Vol. 4); Asquith & Krygowski, Basic Well Log Analysis, 2nd ed. (AAPG Methods in Exploration 16); Ellis & Singer, Well Logging for Earth Scientists, 2nd ed.; Schlumberger, Log Interpretation Charts / Log Interpretation Principles and Applications.

The exam supplies a formula sheet (page 15) and four chart attachments: an SNP borehole-size correction chart and a nonideal-shale-membrane SP departure chart (page 16), SNP mud-weight and temperature/pressure correction charts (page 17), and a water-oil relative permeability ratio chart plus the Schlumberger Rw-equivalent conversion chart (page 18). Every chart reading below is quoted with the reading tolerance it deserves.

Question 9: Water-Saturation Cutoff and Minimum Productive Resistivity (6 marks)

Question text not reproduced: the examination questions are © Engineers and Geoscientists BC. Open the official past paper (linked at the top of this page) to read the question, then follow the worked solution below.

Given.

QuantityValue
Maximum acceptable water cut, $f_w$0.30
Viscosity ratio$\mu_o = 4\mu_w$, hence $\mu_w/\mu_o = 0.25$
Formation-water resistivity, $R_w$0.045 $\Omega \cdot \text{m}$
Average formation resistivity factor, $F$18
Saturation exponent, $n$2
Relative permeability data$k_w/k_o$ versus $S_w$ chart, attachment page 18

Find. (i) The water saturation $S_{w,cut}$ at which the well would produce a 30 % water cut, and (ii) the corresponding minimum productive true resistivity $R_{mp}$ — the deep-resistivity value below which the formation is not worth completing.

Approach. Invert the fractional-flow equation to convert the 30 % water cut into a relative-permeability ratio, read the saturation off the supplied $k_w/k_o$ chart, then substitute that saturation into Archie's saturation equation to obtain the resistivity cutoff.

0.010.11101002530354045505560657075kw/ko = 0.107Sw = 39.4 %water saturation, per cent pore spacewater-oil relative permeability ratio kw/ko
Water-oil relative permeability ratio chart from attachment page 18, digitised. Entering at $k_w/k_o = 0.107$ gives the water-saturation cutoff of 39.4 %.
  1. Write the fractional flow of water at reservoir conditions. Neglecting gravity and capillary terms, the ratio of volumetric rates from Darcy's law for two phases in the same rock is $q_o/q_w = (k_o/\mu_o)/(k_w/\mu_w)$, so $$f_w = \frac{q_w}{q_w + q_o} = \frac{1}{1 + \dfrac{k_o}{k_w}\cdot\dfrac{\mu_w}{\mu_o}}$$
  2. Solve for the relative-permeability ratio at the target water cut. Rearranging and substituting $f_w = 0.30$ and $\mu_w/\mu_o = 0.25$, $$\frac{k_o}{k_w} = \frac{1}{\mu_w/\mu_o}\left(\frac{1}{f_w} - 1\right) = \frac{1}{0.25}\left(\frac{1}{0.30} - 1\right) = 4 \times 2.3333 = 9.333$$ so that $$\frac{k_w}{k_o} = \frac{1}{9.333} = 0.107$$
  3. Read the saturation from the relative-permeability chart. Entering the attachment chart on its logarithmic $k_w/k_o$ axis at 0.107 and dropping to the saturation axis, $$\boxed{S_{w,cut} \approx 39\ \%\ \ (0.394)}$$ Above this saturation the water cut exceeds 30 %; below it the well produces acceptably dry oil.
  4. Convert the saturation cutoff into a resistivity cutoff. Archie's saturation equation with $n = 2$ gives $$S_w^{\,n} = \frac{F R_w}{R_t} \quad\Longrightarrow\quad R_{mp} = \frac{F R_w}{S_{w,cut}^{\,n}}$$ Substituting $F = 18$, $R_w = 0.045\ \Omega \cdot \text{m}$ and $S_{w,cut} = 0.394$, $$R_{mp} = \frac{18 \times 0.045}{(0.394)^2} = \frac{0.81}{0.1552}$$ $$\boxed{R_{mp} = 5.2\ \Omega \cdot \text{m}}$$
  5. Interpret the number. The wet-rock resistivity of this formation is $R_o = F R_w = 18 \times 0.045 = 0.81\ \Omega \cdot \text{m}$, so the cutoff sits at a resistivity index of $R_{mp}/R_o = 6.4$. Any interval whose deep resistivity reads below about 5.2 $\Omega \cdot \text{m}$ carries $S_w > 39\ \%$ and would come in above a 30 % water cut; intervals reading appreciably above it are the completion candidates.
ResultValue
Relative-permeability ratio at 30 % water cut, $k_w/k_o$0.107
Water-saturation cutoff, $S_{w,cut}$39 % (0.394)
Wet-rock resistivity, $R_o = F R_w$0.81 $\Omega \cdot \text{m}$
Minimum productive resistivity, $R_{mp}$5.2 $\Omega \cdot \text{m}$
Resistivity index at the cutoff, $R_{mp}/R_o$6.4

Check: the saturation cutoff is a chart reading, digitised from the attachment at $S_w = 39.4\ \%$ with a tolerance of about $\pm 1.5$ saturation units; that band maps to $R_{mp}$ between roughly 4.8 and 5.7 $\Omega \cdot \text{m}$. Every step after the chart entry is exact arithmetic.