NivaarExam PrepOfficial exam papers ↗

24-Pet-B5 Reservoir Mechanics · May 2015

Question 7 of 7: Two-rate flow test – initial reservoir pressure by superposition

Nivaar worked solution (AI-drafted; not reviewed by a licensed engineer)

Notes on this paper

EGBC National Exam — Petroleum Engineering, 2015-May. 3 hours, closed book. This paper's own cover page reads “98-Pet-B5, Well Testing,” not Reservoir Mechanics, and every question below is pressure-transient/well-test analysis. NOTES item 4/5 state that five (5) questions constitute a complete exam and only the first five as they appear are marked; all seven questions on the paper are solved in full below. Four of the seven questions (Q3–Q6) are chart-reading questions built around semilog/log-log plots; where a printed data table exists (Q3, Q6) it was used directly, and every value read from a chart with no table (Q4, Q5) was read from the printed figure and is flagged check where it feeds a boxed result.

Reference texts: Lee, J., Well Testing, SPE Textbook Series Vol. 1 (diffusivity equation, radial flow, wellbore storage); Earlougher, R.C., Advances in Well Test Analysis, SPE Monograph Vol. 5 (Horner analysis, superposition in time, sealing faults, two-rate tests); Bourdet, D., Well Test Analysis: The Use of Advanced Interpretation Models, Elsevier (double-porosity model, hydraulically fractured wells); Warren, J.E. & Root, P.J., “The Behavior of Naturally Fractured Reservoirs,” SPE Journal, 1963; Cinco-Ley, H. & Samaniego, F., “Transient Pressure Analysis for Fractured Wells,” JPT, 1981 (infinite-conductivity vertical fracture linear flow).

Question 7: Two-rate flow test – initial reservoir pressure by superposition (20 marks)

Question text not reproduced: the examination questions are © Engineers and Geoscientists BC. Open the official past paper (linked at the top of this page) to read the question, then follow the worked solution below.

Given.

QuantitySymbolValue
First rate, duration$q_1,\ t_1$25 STBD, 24 hr
Second rate, duration$q_2,\ \Delta t_2$50 STBD, 72 hr (to $t=96$ hr total)
Wellbore pressure at $t=96$ hr$p_{wf}$1000 psia
Formation permeability$k$162.6 mD
Skin factor$S$2
Formation thickness$h$50 ft
Oil formation volume factor$B_o$1.143 bbl/STB
Porosity$\phi$0.082
Total compressibility$c_t$$10.5\times10^{-6}\ \text{psi}^{-1}$
Oil viscosity$\mu_o$1.278 cp
Wellbore radius$r_w$0.45 ft

Find. Initial reservoir pressure $p_i$.

Approach. Since $k$ and $S$ are already given, superposition in time directly gives $\Delta p$ from $p_i$ to the observed $p_{wf}$ at $t=96$ hr: split the rate history into two increments (0→$q_1$ at $t=0$, then $q_1\rightarrow q_2$ at $t=24$ hr) and sum each increment's own $p_D$ contribution, evaluated at its own elapsed time since that increment began. The supplied $p_D$-vs-$t_D$ chart is the exact-$Ei$ curve; checking $t_D$ first shows both increments are comfortably in the $t_D\gt 100$ log-approximation range, so the chart itself is not needed for a numeric reading here (Check).

0249602550Time (hours)Rate (STBD)q1=25q2=50pwf=1000 psia @ t=96 hr
Fig. 7 – Rate history: 25 STBD for the first 24 hr, then 50 STBD for a further 72 hr, with p_wf=1000 psia recorded at t=96 hr.
  1. Dimensionless times. Using $t_D=0.0002637kt/(\phi\mu c_tr_w^2)$ with the given $k=162.6$ mD, evaluated at each increment's own elapsed time since it began (96 hr for the $q_1$ term, 72 hr for the $q_2-q_1$ term): $$t_{D}(96\text{ hr})\approx1.85\times10^{7},\qquad t_{D}(72\text{ hr})\approx1.39\times10^{7}$$ both far above 100, so the log approximation applies to both terms.
  2. Superposition in time. With rate increments $\Delta q_1=q_1=25$ (from $t=0$) and $\Delta q_2=q_2-q_1=25$ (from $t=24$ hr), and skin $S=2$ carried in each term (the telescoping sum $\Delta q_1+\Delta q_2=q_2$ automatically applies the skin once, at the current total rate), $$\Delta p=\frac{141.2\mu B_o}{kh}\Big[\Delta q_1\big(0.5[\ln t_{D,1}+0.809]+S\big)+\Delta q_2\big(0.5[\ln t_{D,2}+0.809]+S\big)\Big]$$ $$\Delta p=\frac{141.2(1.278)(1.143)}{(162.6)(50)}\Big[25(0.5[\ln(1.85\times10^{7})+0.809]+2)+25(0.5[\ln(1.39\times10^{7})+0.809]+2)\Big]$$ $$\boxed{\Delta p\approx 13.6\ \text{psi}}$$
  3. Initial reservoir pressure. $$p_i=p_{wf}+\Delta p=1000+13.6$$ $$\boxed{p_i\approx 1014\ \text{psia}}$$
ResultValue
$t_D$ (96 hr term)≈ 1.85×10⁷
$t_D$ (72 hr term)≈ 1.39×10⁷
Total pressure drop, $\Delta p$≈ 13.6 psi
Initial reservoir pressure, $p_i$≈ 1014 psia
Back to the paper →