NivaarExam PrepOfficial exam papers ↗

24-Pet-B5 Reservoir Mechanics · May 2016

Question 3 of 6: Drawdown test – permeability, skin, and end of wellbore storage

Nivaar worked solution (AI-drafted; not reviewed by a licensed engineer)

Notes on this paper

EGBC National Exam — Petroleum Engineering, 2016-May. 3 hours, closed book, non-communicating calculator. This paper's own cover page reads “98-Pet-B5, Well Testing,” not Reservoir Mechanics — every question below is pressure-transient/well-test analysis. NOTES items 4/5 state that five (5) questions constitute a complete exam and only the first five as they appear are marked; all six questions on the paper are solved in full below. Three of the six questions (Q3, Q4, Q6) are chart-reading questions built around semilog/log-log plots with no printed data table for Q3/Q4; every value read from those charts is flagged check where it feeds a boxed result. Q6 ships a short printed data table for its early-time linear-flow fit; its flow-regime identification uses the full log-log pressure-change/derivative plot.

Reference texts: Lee, J., Well Testing, SPE Textbook Series Vol. 1 (diffusivity equation, radial flow, wellbore storage, superposition); Earlougher, R.C., Advances in Well Test Analysis, SPE Monograph Vol. 5 (Horner analysis, interference/pulse tests, reservoir-limit tests); Bourdet, D., Well Test Analysis: The Use of Advanced Interpretation Models, Elsevier (derivative diagnostic plot, flow-regime identification); Cinco-Ley, H. & Samaniego, F., “Transient Pressure Analysis for Fractured Wells,” JPT, 1981 (infinite-conductivity vertical fracture linear flow).

Question 3: Drawdown test – permeability, skin, and end of wellbore storage (20 marks)

Question text not reproduced: the examination questions are © Engineers and Geoscientists BC. Open the official past paper (linked at the top of this page) to read the question, then follow the worked solution below.

Values are reported to the nearest 1–5 psi / significant figure the chart resolution supports.

Given. $q=550$ STBD, $h=20$ ft, $B_o=1.45$ bbl/STB, $\phi=0.23$, $c_t=6\times10^{-5}\ \text{psi}^{-1}$, $\mu=0.42$ cP, $r_w=0.5$ ft, $p_i=5665$ psia. Drawdown data read from the printed chart (excerpted; full 23-point set spans $t=0.13$ to $726$ hr):

Flowing pressure vs. time (read from the printed chart)
$t$ (hr)$p_{wf}$ (psia)
0.135645
0.635577
2.085549
4.205527
24.85440
98.35370
244.55322
486.75267
725.95211

Find. (a) Permeability $k$; (b) Skin factor $S$; (c) End of wellbore storage; (d) Acidizing recommendation.

Approach. Plot $p_{wf}$ vs. $\log t$ (MDH plot); the log-log $\Delta p$-vs-$t$ plot flattens out of its early steep decline by $t\approx0.5$–1 hr, marking the approach of the end of wellbore storage, while a regression search across the full semilog data set (excluding early storage-affected and any late boundary-affected points) finds the true infinite-acting radial-flow straight line spanning $t=4.2$ to $245$ hr ($R^2=0.999$) — comfortably more than a log cycle past the storage-affected region, the standard buffer. That line gives $m$ and the extrapolated $p_{1hr}$ for the permeability and skin equations.

0.1 1 10 100 1000 5150 5288 5425 5562 5700 Time, t (hr) Flowing pressure (psia) Q3 - Drawdown semilog (MDH)
Digitized drawdown data (red) with the fitted MTR straight line (dashed); shaded band marks the regression window $t=4.2$–245 hr used for $k$ and $S$.
  1. Fit the middle-time-region (MTR) straight line. Least-squares fit of $p_{wf}$ vs. $\log_{10}t$ over $t=4.2$ to $245$ hr (12 points, $R^2=0.999$) gives slope $$m\approx 115.1\ \text{psi/cycle},\qquad p_{1hr}\approx 5600\ \text{psia (extrapolated on the fitted line)}$$
  2. (a) Permeability. $$k=\frac{162.6q\mu B_o}{mh}=\frac{162.6(550)(0.42)(1.45)}{(115.1)(20)}$$ $$\boxed{k\approx 23.7\ \text{mD}}$$
  3. (b) Skin factor. Using the drawdown skin formula with $p_i=5665$ psia and the fitted $p_{1hr}$, $$S=1.151\left[\frac{p_i-p_{1hr}}{m}-\log_{10}\!\left(\frac{k}{\phi\mu c_tr_w^2}\right)+3.23\right]$$ $$S=1.151\left[\frac{5665-5600}{115.1}-\log_{10}\!\left(\frac{23.7}{(0.23)(0.42)(6\times10^{-5})(0.5)^2}\right)+3.23\right]$$ $$\boxed{S\approx -3.9}$$
  4. (c) End of wellbore storage. The log-log $\Delta p$-vs-$t$ plot shows a steep early decline (consistent with unit-slope storage domination) that has already flattened toward the eventual radial-flow trend by $t\approx0.5$–1 hr; the semilog straight line is not reliably established until $t\approx4$ hr (about a log cycle later, the standard buffer used to avoid residual storage distortion in the fitted slope). Check: chart-read estimate. $$\boxed{t_{WBS,end}\approx 1\ \text{hr}}$$
  5. (d) Acidizing recommendation. The computed skin is strongly negative ($S\approx-3.9$), indicating a completion that already performs better than an undamaged (zero-skin) well — not a damaged one. $$\boxed{\text{No, acidizing is not recommended: }S<0\text{ shows no formation damage.}}$$
ResultValue
MTR slope, $m$≈ 115 psi/cycle
Permeability, $k$≈ 23.7 mD
Skin factor, $S$≈ −3.9
End of wellbore storage≈ 1 hr
Acidize?No (negative skin)