Question 6 of 6: Rod Released from a Spring-and-Cable Support — Free Motion After Sudden Release
Nivaar worked solution (AI-drafted; not reviewed by a licensed engineer)
Notes on this paper
98-Phys-A1, Classical Mechanics — National Exam, May 2017. 3-hour closed-book exam; FIVE (5) questions constitute a complete paper and only the first five questions as they appear in a candidate's answer book are marked, each of equal value. All six printed questions are solved below as a complete study resource.
Given. Uniform rod $AB$, mass $m=1$ kg, length $L=2$ m, initially horizontal and at rest, supported by a spring (vertical, at $A$) and a cable (vertical, to the ceiling, at $B$). At $t=0$ the cable snaps and (by the stated assumption) the spring simultaneously loses contact with the rod, so for all $t>0$ the rod is a free rigid body subject to gravity alone.
Rod $AB$ (2 m) on a spring at $A$ and a cable at $B$; both supports are removed at $t=0$.
Find. Angular velocity $\omega$ and acceleration of the centre of mass $a_{\text{cm}}$ at $t=1$ s.
Approach. Before $t=0$ the rod is in static equilibrium (spring and cable share the weight equally, since the C.M. sits at the midpoint), so $\omega(0)=0$ and $v_{\text{cm}}(0)=0$. For $t>0$, with both supports gone, the only force acting is gravity, which acts through the C.M. and so exerts zero net torque about it — the angular velocity therefore cannot change from its $t=0$ value, while the C.M. is in ordinary free fall.
Confirm the pre-release state. Taking moments about $A$ for the rod in equilibrium (weight $mg$ at the midpoint, 1 m from each end; cable tension $T$ at $B$, spring force $F_s$ at $A$): $T(2)-mg(1)=0\Rightarrow T=mg/2$, and vertically $F_s=mg-T=mg/2$. Both supports share the weight equally, and both $\omega(0)=0$, $v_{\text{cm}}(0)=0$ (nothing was moving before release).
Apply Newton–Euler for $t>0$. With the spring assumed detached the instant the cable snaps, the free-body diagram for $t>0$ has only the weight $mg$, acting at the C.M.:
$$\sum \vec F = m\vec a_{\text{cm}} \ \Rightarrow\ \vec a_{\text{cm}}=\vec g\ (\text{constant, downward}),\qquad \sum M_{\text{cm}} = I_{\text{cm}}\dot\omega = 0\ \Rightarrow\ \dot\omega=0.$$
Since $\dot\omega\equiv 0$ for all $t>0$ and $\omega(0)=0$, we get $\omega(t)\equiv 0$ for every $t>0$ — the rod never begins to rotate; it simply falls, remaining horizontal.
Evaluate at $t=1$ s.
$$\boxed{\omega(1\,\text{s}) = 0}, \qquad \boxed{a_{\text{cm}}(1\,\text{s}) = g = 9.81\ \text{m/s}^2\ \text{(downward, unchanged from any other instant)}}.$$
(As a bonus, $v_{\text{cm}}(1\,\text{s})=g\cdot t = 9.81$ m/s downward — numerically equal to $g$ purely because $t=1$ s exactly.)
Final results
Quantity
Value at $t=1$ s
Angular velocity, $\omega$
0 rad/s
Acceleration of centre of mass, $a_{\text{cm}}$
9.81 m/s², downward
(bonus) velocity of centre of mass, $v_{\text{cm}}$
9.81 m/s, downward
Check: this result depends entirely on the problem's own stated assumption that the spring detaches from the rod at the same instant the cable snaps. If the spring instead remained in contact (still pushing up at its pre-release force $mg/2$ while the rod's end $A$ stays on it), the rod would instead begin to rotate about the spring contact under an unbalanced moment at $B$ — a materially different, coupled problem the question explicitly asks us not to solve.