17-Phys-A7 Optics · May 2015
Nivaar worked solution (AI-drafted; not reviewed by a licensed engineer)
Paper format. National Examinations, May 2015, 98-Phys-A7 Optics. Three hours, closed book, one approved Casio or Sharp calculator. Question 1 is mandatory; the rubric asks for Question 1 plus any four of Questions 2–6 (only the first four questions appearing in the answer book are marked) — all six are worked here, because the set is a study resource.
Reference texts. E. Hecht, Optics, 5th ed.; F. L. Pedrotti, L. M. Pedrotti and L. S. Pedrotti, Introduction to Optics, 3rd ed.
Question text not reproduced: the examination questions are © Engineers and Geoscientists BC. Open the official past paper (linked at the top of this page) to read the question, then follow the worked solution below.
Part (a) — normal-incidence Fresnel coefficients. Take the interface at $y=0$ with normal $\hat y$ (the same axes as Question 3), medium 1 ($n_1$) at $y<0$, medium 2 ($n_2$) at $y>0$, all waves normally incident/reflected/transmitted along $\pm\hat y$, $\mathbf E$ along $\hat z$ (choice of polarization is immaterial at normal incidence, since TE and TM coincide there). Write the fields as
$$E_i=E_{0i}\cos(k_1y-\omega t),\quad E_r=E_{0r}\cos(-k_1y-\omega t),\quad E_t=E_{0t}\cos(k_2y-\omega t),$$with the associated $H$ fields from $H=nE/\eta_0$ (incident and transmitted $H$ along $+\hat x$; reflected $H$ along $-\hat x$, since $\mathbf S=\mathbf E\times\mathbf H$ must reverse with the reversed propagation direction). Maxwell's boundary conditions require the tangential $E$ and tangential $H$ to be continuous at $y=0$ (no free surface charge/current on a dielectric interface):
$$\begin{gathered} E_{0i}+E_{0r}=E_{0t} \qquad \text{(tangential }E\text{ continuity)}\\ n_1(E_{0i}-E_{0r})=n_2E_{0t} \qquad \text{(tangential }H\text{ continuity, using }H=nE/\eta_0\text{)} \end{gathered}$$Solving this pair of linear equations for $r=E_{0r}/E_{0i}$ and $t=E_{0t}/E_{0i}$:
$$\boxed{r=\dfrac{n_1-n_2}{n_1+n_2}}, \qquad \boxed{t=\dfrac{2n_1}{n_1+n_2}}.$$($t$ can exceed $1$ — that is normal for the field amplitude; the energy transmittance $T=(n_2/n_1)t^2\le1$ always.)
Part (b) — internal reflection, water→air.
Given. $n_1=1.33$ (water, incidence side), $n_2=1.00$ (air), full Fresnel equations $r_s=\dfrac{n_1\cos\theta_i-n_2\cos\theta_t}{n_1\cos\theta_i+n_2\cos\theta_t}$, $r_p=\dfrac{n_2\cos\theta_i-n_1\cos\theta_t}{n_2\cos\theta_i+n_1\cos\theta_t}$ with $\sin\theta_t=(n_1/n_2)\sin\theta_i$.
Find. $r_s(\theta_i)$, $r_p(\theta_i)$ (and $t_s,t_p$) with numerical values at the salient features: $\theta_i=0$, the internal Brewster angle, and the critical angle.
Approach. Evaluate the boxed normal-incidence result at $\theta_i=0$; find the internal Brewster angle from $r_p=0$; find the critical angle from $\sin\theta_t=1$; sketch the four curves over $0\le\theta_i<\theta_c$ (beyond $\theta_c$, $\theta_t$ is complex — total internal reflection, $|r|=1$).
Part (c) — external reflection, air→water.
Given. $n_1=1.00$ (air, incidence side), $n_2=1.33$ (water); same Fresnel formulas as (b), now with $n_1 \lt n_2$ so no total internal reflection occurs (real $\theta_t$ for all $\theta_i\le90^\circ$).
Find. $r_s(\theta_i)$, $r_p(\theta_i)$ with numerical salient values at $\theta_i=0$, the (external) Brewster angle, and grazing incidence.
| Feature | Internal (water→air) | External (air→water) |
|---|---|---|
| $r$ at $\theta_i=0$ | $+0.142$ | $-0.142$ |
| Brewster angle ($r_p=0$) | $36.9^\circ$ | $53.1^\circ$ |
| Critical angle | $48.8^\circ$ | — (none) |
Part (d) — polarizing sunglasses. Light reflecting off a horizontal water or road surface at close to the external Brewster angle ($53.1^\circ$ for water) has $r_p\approx0$: the reflected glare is almost purely $s$-polarized. For a horizontal reflecting surface the plane of incidence is vertical, so the $s$-polarization direction (perpendicular to the plane of incidence) is horizontal — reflected glare is therefore predominantly horizontally polarized light. Polarizing sunglasses are most effective exactly when the reflecting surface is viewed near its Brewster angle (i.e. looking down at water or a road at a moderate angle, roughly $50$–$55^\circ$ from vertical for water); a shallower or steeper viewing angle admits more of the (still partially polarized) $p$-component and the glare is not fully blocked. The transmission axis of the sunglasses is oriented vertically under normal use, so as to absorb the horizontally-polarized glare while passing the (largely unpolarized) vertically-polarized component of the scene.