NivaarExam PrepOfficial exam papers ↗

17-Phys-B2 Electro-Optical Engineering · May 2015

Question 4 of 6: Silicon Photodiode — Measured Responsivity, Bandwidth, and Noise

Nivaar worked solution (AI-drafted; not reviewed by a licensed engineer)

Notes on this paper

Paper format. 98-Phys-B2 Electro-Optical Engineering, National Examination May 2015 — a three-hour closed-book examination (one 8.5×11 inch double-sided handwritten note sheet permitted). The cover page states any five of the six questions constitute a complete paper and only the first five as they appear in the answer book are marked; every question is nonetheless answered in full below so the paper remains a complete study resource. Figure-based Question 4 is solved against the actual photodiode responsivity curve printed on the exam, not an assumed shape.

Reference texts. G. Keiser, Optical Fiber Communications, 4th ed. (fiber modes and dispersion, link power and risetime budgets, LED/laser and photodiode characteristics, EDFA); B. E. A. Saleh and M. C. Teich, Fundamentals of Photonics, 2nd ed. (LED spectral width, laser diode rate equations, photodiode noise); E. Hecht, Optics, 5th ed. (waveguiding and dispersion background).

Question 4: Silicon Photodiode — Measured Responsivity, Bandwidth, and Noise (equal value)

Question text not reproduced: the examination questions are © Engineers and Geoscientists BC. Open the official past paper (linked at the top of this page) to read the question, then follow the worked solution below.

Given.

Given data
QuantitySymbolValue
Photosensitive area$A$5 mm$^2$
Reverse bias$V_R$30 V
Dark current$I_d$10 nA
Junction capacitance$C_j$3 pF
Transit time$t_{tr}$0.5 ns
Load resistance$R_L$50 Ω
Amplifier input capacitance$C_{amp}$7 pF
Temperature$T$300 K

The measured responsivity vs. wavelength curve (both 0 V and 30 V bias) is reproduced below from the exam's own figure.

Find. (a) The physical origin of the responsivity curve's shape. (b) Quantum efficiency at 850 nm at 0 V and 30 V bias. (c) Incident intensity giving $I_{photo}=I_d$ at 30 V bias. (d) Detection bandwidth and response time. (e) Quantum- and thermal-noise-limited SNR and the NEP at 10 µW incident, 30 V bias. (f) Operating mode (photovoltaic vs. photoconductive) with I-V curve and load line.

Approach. Read responsivity values directly off the given curve at 850 nm; convert to quantum efficiency via $\eta=Rh\nu/q$. Combine the RC time constant (load + amplifier capacitance) with the transit-time-limited bandwidth to get the overall detection bandwidth, then invert for response time. Compute shot- and thermal-noise-limited SNR and NEP at the stated bandwidth and optical power.

[Figure not reproduced: Measured photodiode responsivity vs. wavelength, 0V and 30V bias. See the official exam paper or the cited reference text.]

Measured responsivity vs. wavelength (reproduced from the exam figure). At 850 nm: $R(0\text{V})\approx0.54$ A/W, $R(30\text{V})\approx0.57$ A/W.

Part (a) — main features of the curve

The responsivity rises roughly linearly from a short-wavelength cutoff near 400–500 nm, peaks around 850–900 nm, then falls sharply above about 1000–1100 nm. The short-wavelength roll-off occurs because high-energy (blue/UV) photons are absorbed within a few tens of nanometres of the surface, in the heavily doped, poorly-collected $p^+$ (or $n^+$) surface layer, so many photogenerated carriers recombine before reaching the depletion region. The long-wavelength cutoff near 1100 nm is set by silicon's indirect bandgap, $E_g=1.11$ eV $\Rightarrow\lambda_g=hc/E_g=1117$ nm: photons longer than this lack the energy to create an electron-hole pair at all, and the absorption coefficient falls steeply as $\lambda\to\lambda_g$ from below (silicon is an indirect-gap semiconductor, so absorption near the edge is weak and requires phonon assistance). The 30 V reverse bias curve sits slightly above the 0 V curve across the whole peak region because the wider depletion width at higher reverse bias collects photogenerated carriers from deeper in the silicon (closer to where longer-wavelength light is actually absorbed) before they can recombine, raising the effective quantum efficiency.

Part (b) — quantum efficiency at 850 nm

  1. Photon energy at 850 nm. $$h\nu=\frac{hc}{\lambda}=\frac{1239.8\ \text{eV}\cdot\text{nm}}{850\ \text{nm}}=1.459\ \text{eV}.$$
  2. Quantum efficiency, $\eta=R\,(h\nu/q)$. Reading $R(0\text{V})\approx0.54$ A/W and $R(30\text{V})\approx0.57$ A/W off the curve at 850 nm, $$\eta_{0V}=\frac{(0.54)(1.459)}{1}=0.788\ (78.8\%),\qquad \eta_{30V}=\frac{(0.57)(1.459)}{1}=\boxed{0.831\ (83.1\%)}.$$ Both exceed typical commercial photodiode quantum efficiencies because $R\approx0.5$ A/W near the peak already implies $\eta$ close to unity at this wavelength — consistent with a well-designed silicon detector operating near its responsivity maximum.

Part (c) — intensity giving $I_{photo}=I_d$ at 30 V

  1. Required incident power. $$P=\frac{I_d}{R_{30V}}=\frac{10\times10^{-9}}{0.57}=1.75\times10^{-8}\ \text{W}=17.5\ \text{nW}.$$
  2. Intensity. $$I=\frac{P}{A}=\frac{1.75\times10^{-8}\ \text{W}}{5\times10^{-6}\ \text{m}^2}=\boxed{3.51\times10^{-3}\ \text{W/m}^2}=0.351\ \mu\text{W/cm}^2.$$

Part (d) — bandwidth and response time

  1. RC-limited bandwidth. Total capacitance loading the load resistor is $C_T=C_j+C_{amp}=3+7=10$ pF: $$f_{RC}=\frac{1}{2\pi R_LC_T}=\frac{1}{2\pi(50)(10\times10^{-12})}=318\ \text{MHz}.$$
  2. Transit-time-limited bandwidth. $$f_{tr}=\frac{0.44}{t_{tr}}=\frac{0.44}{0.5\times10^{-9}}=880\ \text{MHz}.$$
  3. Combined 3 dB bandwidth (independent limits combine as reciprocal-squares): $$f_{3dB}=\left(\frac{1}{f_{RC}^2}+\frac{1}{f_{tr}^2}\right)^{-1/2}=\boxed{299\ \text{MHz}}.$$
  4. Response time. Using the standard risetime-bandwidth product $t_r\approx0.35/f_{3dB}$, $$t_r=\frac{0.35}{299\times10^6}=\boxed{1.17\ \text{ns}}.$$

Part (e) — noise limits and NEP at 10 µW, 30 V

  1. Signal photocurrent. $$I_p=R_{30V}P_{inc}=(0.57)(10\times10^{-6})=5.70\times10^{-6}\ \text{A}.$$
  2. Quantum (shot-noise) limit. The fundamental shot-noise-limited SNR, using the detection bandwidth from part (d), $$\mathrm{SNR}_{quantum}=\frac{I_p^2}{2qI_pB_{det}}=\frac{I_p}{2qB_{det}} =\frac{5.70\times10^{-6}}{2(1.602\times10^{-19})(2.99\times10^{8})}=\boxed{5.94\times10^{4}\ (47.7\ \text{dB})}.$$
  3. Thermal-noise limit. $$\overline{i_{th}^2}=\frac{4kTB_{det}}{R_L}=\frac{4(1.381\times10^{-23})(300)(2.99\times10^8)}{50}=9.92\times10^{-14}\ \text{A}^2,$$ $$\mathrm{SNR}_{thermal}=\frac{I_p^2}{\overline{i_{th}^2}}=\frac{(5.70\times10^{-6})^2}{9.92\times10^{-14}}=\boxed{327\ (25.1\ \text{dB})}.$$ The thermal limit is far below the quantum limit here, i.e. thermal noise (not shot noise) sets the practical noise floor for this receiver — consistent with Q2(c)'s finding for the LED link.
  4. NEP (thermal-noise-referred, at $B_{det}=1$ Hz). $$\mathrm{NEP}=\frac{\sqrt{\overline{i_{th}^2}/B_{det}}}{R_{30V}} =\frac{\sqrt{4kT/R_L}}{R_{30V}}=\boxed{3.19\times10^{-11}\ \text{W}/\sqrt{\text{Hz}}}.$$

Part (f) — operating mode, I-V curve and load line

With a 30 V external reverse bias applied and a small load resistor carrying the photocurrent, the diode is operated in the photoconductive mode (as opposed to the unbiased, photovoltaic/solar-cell mode where the diode itself supplies the power). Reverse bias widens the depletion region (improving speed and, as seen in part (b), quantum efficiency) and keeps the diode current an essentially linear function of incident optical power over a wide range, which is why photoconductive operation is preferred for high-bandwidth detection.

VIreverse biasforward biasdark (I_D only)P1 (low)P2 (10 μW)load line (slope -1/R_L)Q-point (-30V, photoconductive)
Photodiode I-V characteristic: dark curve (light gray) and two illumination levels shift the curve downward into the third quadrant. The steep load line (slope $-1/R_L$, $R_L=50\ \Omega$) intersects each illuminated curve at the operating (Q) point — here in reverse bias, confirming photoconductive operation.
Final results
QuantityValue
(b) QE at 850 nm, 0 V78.8%
(b) QE at 850 nm, 30 V83.1%
(c) Intensity for $I_{photo}=I_d$$3.51\times10^{-3}$ W/m$^2$
(d) Detection bandwidth299 MHz
(d) Response time1.17 ns
(e) Quantum-limited SNR$5.94\times10^4$ (47.7 dB)
(e) Thermal-limited SNR327 (25.1 dB)
(e) NEP$3.19\times10^{-11}$ W/√Hz
(f) Operating modePhotoconductive
Check: the responsivity values at 850 nm ($R_{0V}\approx0.54$ A/W, $R_{30V}\approx0.57$ A/W) are read off the exam's own printed curve (reproduced above) at its own gridline resolution (0.1 A/W major divisions); a ±0.02 A/W reading uncertainty propagates to roughly ±3% in every downstream part (b)–(e) result.