Question 4 of 6: Silicon Photodiode — Measured Responsivity, Bandwidth, and Noise
Nivaar worked solution (AI-drafted; not reviewed by a licensed engineer)
Notes on this paper
Paper format. 98-Phys-B2 Electro-Optical Engineering, National
Examination May 2015 — a three-hour closed-book examination (one 8.5×11 inch
double-sided handwritten note sheet permitted). The cover page states any five of
the six questions constitute a complete paper and only the first five as they appear
in the answer book are marked; every question is nonetheless answered in full below so the
paper remains a complete study resource. Figure-based Question 4 is solved against the actual
photodiode responsivity curve printed on the exam, not an
assumed shape.
Reference texts. G. Keiser, Optical Fiber Communications, 4th ed.
(fiber modes and dispersion, link power and risetime budgets, LED/laser and photodiode
characteristics, EDFA); B. E. A. Saleh and M. C. Teich, Fundamentals of Photonics,
2nd ed. (LED spectral width, laser diode rate equations, photodiode noise); E. Hecht,
Optics, 5th ed. (waveguiding and dispersion background).
The measured responsivity vs. wavelength curve (both 0 V and 30 V bias) is reproduced below
from the exam's own figure.
Find. (a) The physical origin of the responsivity curve's shape.
(b) Quantum efficiency at 850 nm at 0 V and 30 V bias. (c) Incident intensity giving
$I_{photo}=I_d$ at 30 V bias. (d) Detection bandwidth and response time. (e) Quantum- and
thermal-noise-limited SNR and the NEP at 10 µW incident, 30 V bias. (f) Operating mode
(photovoltaic vs. photoconductive) with I-V curve and load line.
Approach. Read responsivity values directly off the given curve at 850 nm;
convert to quantum efficiency via $\eta=Rh\nu/q$. Combine the RC time constant (load +
amplifier capacitance) with the transit-time-limited bandwidth to get the overall detection
bandwidth, then invert for response time. Compute shot- and thermal-noise-limited SNR and NEP
at the stated bandwidth and optical power.
[Figure not reproduced: Measured photodiode responsivity vs. wavelength, 0V and 30V bias. See the official exam paper or the cited reference text.]
Measured responsivity vs. wavelength (reproduced from the exam figure).
At 850 nm: $R(0\text{V})\approx0.54$ A/W, $R(30\text{V})\approx0.57$ A/W.
Part (a) — main features of the curve
The responsivity rises roughly linearly from a short-wavelength cutoff near 400–500 nm,
peaks around 850–900 nm, then falls sharply above about 1000–1100 nm. The
short-wavelength roll-off occurs because high-energy (blue/UV) photons are
absorbed within a few tens of nanometres of the surface, in the heavily doped, poorly-collected
$p^+$ (or $n^+$) surface layer, so many photogenerated carriers recombine before reaching the
depletion region. The long-wavelength cutoff near 1100 nm is set by silicon's
indirect bandgap, $E_g=1.11$ eV $\Rightarrow\lambda_g=hc/E_g=1117$ nm: photons longer than this
lack the energy to create an electron-hole pair at all, and the absorption coefficient falls
steeply as $\lambda\to\lambda_g$ from below (silicon is an indirect-gap semiconductor, so
absorption near the edge is weak and requires phonon assistance). The 30 V reverse
bias curve sits slightly above the 0 V curve across the whole peak region because the
wider depletion width at higher reverse bias collects photogenerated carriers from deeper in
the silicon (closer to where longer-wavelength light is actually absorbed) before they can
recombine, raising the effective quantum efficiency.
Part (b) — quantum efficiency at 850 nm
Photon energy at 850 nm.
$$h\nu=\frac{hc}{\lambda}=\frac{1239.8\ \text{eV}\cdot\text{nm}}{850\ \text{nm}}=1.459\ \text{eV}.$$
Quantum efficiency, $\eta=R\,(h\nu/q)$. Reading $R(0\text{V})\approx0.54$
A/W and $R(30\text{V})\approx0.57$ A/W off the curve at 850 nm,
$$\eta_{0V}=\frac{(0.54)(1.459)}{1}=0.788\ (78.8\%),\qquad
\eta_{30V}=\frac{(0.57)(1.459)}{1}=\boxed{0.831\ (83.1\%)}.$$
Both exceed typical commercial photodiode quantum efficiencies because $R\approx0.5$ A/W near
the peak already implies $\eta$ close to unity at this wavelength — consistent with a
well-designed silicon detector operating near its responsivity maximum.
Part (c) — intensity giving $I_{photo}=I_d$ at 30 V
RC-limited bandwidth. Total capacitance loading the load resistor is
$C_T=C_j+C_{amp}=3+7=10$ pF:
$$f_{RC}=\frac{1}{2\pi R_LC_T}=\frac{1}{2\pi(50)(10\times10^{-12})}=318\ \text{MHz}.$$
Combined 3 dB bandwidth (independent limits combine as
reciprocal-squares):
$$f_{3dB}=\left(\frac{1}{f_{RC}^2}+\frac{1}{f_{tr}^2}\right)^{-1/2}=\boxed{299\ \text{MHz}}.$$
Response time. Using the standard risetime-bandwidth product
$t_r\approx0.35/f_{3dB}$,
$$t_r=\frac{0.35}{299\times10^6}=\boxed{1.17\ \text{ns}}.$$
Part (e) — noise limits and NEP at 10 µW, 30 V
Signal photocurrent.
$$I_p=R_{30V}P_{inc}=(0.57)(10\times10^{-6})=5.70\times10^{-6}\ \text{A}.$$
Quantum (shot-noise) limit. The fundamental shot-noise-limited SNR, using
the detection bandwidth from part (d),
$$\mathrm{SNR}_{quantum}=\frac{I_p^2}{2qI_pB_{det}}=\frac{I_p}{2qB_{det}}
=\frac{5.70\times10^{-6}}{2(1.602\times10^{-19})(2.99\times10^{8})}=\boxed{5.94\times10^{4}\ (47.7\ \text{dB})}.$$
Thermal-noise limit.
$$\overline{i_{th}^2}=\frac{4kTB_{det}}{R_L}=\frac{4(1.381\times10^{-23})(300)(2.99\times10^8)}{50}=9.92\times10^{-14}\ \text{A}^2,$$
$$\mathrm{SNR}_{thermal}=\frac{I_p^2}{\overline{i_{th}^2}}=\frac{(5.70\times10^{-6})^2}{9.92\times10^{-14}}=\boxed{327\ (25.1\ \text{dB})}.$$
The thermal limit is far below the quantum limit here, i.e. thermal noise (not shot noise)
sets the practical noise floor for this receiver — consistent with Q2(c)'s finding for
the LED link.
NEP (thermal-noise-referred, at $B_{det}=1$ Hz).
$$\mathrm{NEP}=\frac{\sqrt{\overline{i_{th}^2}/B_{det}}}{R_{30V}}
=\frac{\sqrt{4kT/R_L}}{R_{30V}}=\boxed{3.19\times10^{-11}\ \text{W}/\sqrt{\text{Hz}}}.$$
Part (f) — operating mode, I-V curve and load line
With a 30 V external reverse bias applied and a small load resistor carrying the
photocurrent, the diode is operated in the photoconductive mode (as opposed to
the unbiased, photovoltaic/solar-cell mode where the diode itself supplies the power). Reverse
bias widens the depletion region (improving speed and, as seen in part (b), quantum
efficiency) and keeps the diode current an essentially linear function of incident optical
power over a wide range, which is why photoconductive operation is preferred for
high-bandwidth detection.
Photodiode I-V characteristic: dark curve (light gray) and two
illumination levels shift the curve downward into the third quadrant. The steep load line
(slope $-1/R_L$, $R_L=50\ \Omega$) intersects each illuminated curve at the operating (Q) point
— here in reverse bias, confirming photoconductive operation.
Final results
Quantity
Value
(b) QE at 850 nm, 0 V
78.8%
(b) QE at 850 nm, 30 V
83.1%
(c) Intensity for $I_{photo}=I_d$
$3.51\times10^{-3}$ W/m$^2$
(d) Detection bandwidth
299 MHz
(d) Response time
1.17 ns
(e) Quantum-limited SNR
$5.94\times10^4$ (47.7 dB)
(e) Thermal-limited SNR
327 (25.1 dB)
(e) NEP
$3.19\times10^{-11}$ W/√Hz
(f) Operating mode
Photoconductive
Check: the responsivity values at 850 nm ($R_{0V}\approx0.54$ A/W,
$R_{30V}\approx0.57$ A/W) are read off the exam's own printed curve (reproduced above) at its
own gridline resolution (0.1 A/W major divisions); a ±0.02 A/W reading uncertainty
propagates to roughly ±3% in every downstream part (b)–(e) result.