17-Phys-B4 Signals and Communications · December 2014
Question 5 of 7: Superheterodyne Receiver — LO Tuning, Image Frequency and Front-End Filter
Nivaar worked solution (AI-drafted; not reviewed by a licensed engineer)
Notes on this paper
Paper format. 98-Phys-B4 Communications, National Examination
December 2014 — a three-hour closed-book examination (a standard non-programmable,
no-text-storage calculator is the only aid permitted). The cover page states any
five of the seven questions constitute a complete paper, with only the
first five as they appear in the answer book marked; every question is nonetheless
answered in full below so the paper remains a complete study resource. All seven
questions carry equal value.
Reference texts. A. V. Oppenheim and A. S. Willsky, Signals and
Systems, 2nd ed. (Fourier transform properties, LTI convolution, the sampling
theorem); S. Haykin and M. Moher, Communication Systems, 5th ed. (AM/DSB/FM/PM
modulation, PCM, the superheterodyne receiver); B. P. Lathi and Z. Ding, Modern
Digital and Analog Communication Systems, 4th ed. (envelope/coherent detection,
image-frequency rejection); J. G. Proakis and D. G. Manolakis, Digital Signal
Processing, 4th ed. (z-transforms, difference equations, BIBO stability).
Question 5: Superheterodyne Receiver — LO Tuning, Image Frequency and Front-End Filter (1/5 of paper)
Find. (a) the two LO tuning frequencies and which is preferable for a
tunable channel block; (b) the image frequency for the preferred choice; (c) the AM band
edges and the number of stations the fixed front-end filter admits.
Approach. A mixer produces $f_c\pm f_{LO}$ terms, so either
$f_{LO}=f_c+f_{IF}$ (high-side injection) or $f_{LO}=f_c-f_{IF}$ (low-side injection) puts
one of them at $f_{IF}$; compare the LO TUNING RATIO each requires across a channel block
to find the preferable one. The image frequency is the other input frequency that also
mixes to $f_{IF}$ with the same LO. The fixed front-end filter must pass the whole tuned
channel block while keeping every channel's image OUTSIDE that same passband.
Part (a) — two LO frequencies and the preferable one. Either
sideband of the mixer product can land at $f_{IF}$:
$$f_{LO}=f_c+f_{IF}=2.8\ \text{MHz (high-side)}\qquad\text{or}\qquad f_{LO}=f_c-f_{IF}=1.2\ \text{MHz (low-side)}$$
For a receiver that must tune across a BLOCK of channels (LO frequency varies with $f_c$),
compare the required LO tuning RATIO $f_{LO,\max}/f_{LO,\min}$ for each choice: adding the
constant $f_{IF}$ (high-side) compresses the ratio toward 1 relative to the RF's own
ratio, while subtracting it (low-side) expands the ratio. A smaller LO tuning ratio is
easier to realize with a single tracking variable capacitor/inductor, which is exactly why
real AM receivers use high-side injection almost universally. So
$$\boxed{f_{LO}=2.8\ \text{MHz (high-side injection) is preferable}}$$
Part (b) — image frequency. With high-side injection, the image
is the OTHER input frequency that also mixes to $f_{IF}$ with the same LO, i.e. the one
$f_{IF}$ further beyond the LO from $f_c$:
$$f_{image}=f_{LO}+f_{IF}=f_c+2f_{IF}=2\ \text{MHz}+1.6\ \text{MHz}=\boxed{3.6\ \text{MHz}}$$
Part (c) — fixed front-end filter: AM band and station count. A
FIXED (non-tracking) front-end filter must pass every channel in the tuned block, from
$f_{c,\min}$ to $f_{c,\max}$, while each channel's own image ($f_c+2f_{IF}$, high-side)
must stay outside that same passband, so the lowest channel's image cannot fall below the
highest channel: $f_{c,\max}\le f_{c,\min}+2f_{IF}$, i.e. the whole band the front-end can
unambiguously cover is capped at $2f_{IF}=1.6$ MHz, centered on 2 MHz:
$$f_{lo,edge}=2-0.8=1.2\ \text{MHz}\qquad f_{hi,edge}=2+0.8=2.8\ \text{MHz}$$
$$\boxed{\text{AM band: }1.2\ \text{MHz to }2.8\ \text{MHz (1.6 MHz wide)}}$$
With 20 kHz channels, the number of stations that fit in this span is
$$N=\dfrac{1.6\ \text{MHz}}{20\ \text{kHz}}=\boxed{80\ \text{stations}}$$