Question 8 of 8: Nyquist Criterion and State-Space Step Response
Nivaar worked solution (AI-drafted; not reviewed by a licensed engineer)
Notes on this paper
Paper format. 98-Phys-B5 Systems & Control, National Examination
May 2016 — a three-hour closed-book examination with one double-sided handwritten
formula/notes sheet permitted and an approved calculator. Questions 1 and 2 are compulsory;
candidates choose three of the remaining six (3–8). Every question is nonetheless
answered in full below so the paper remains a complete study resource. All eight questions
carry equal value (20 marks each).
Reference texts. N. S. Nise, Control Systems Engineering, 7th ed.
(transient-response specifications, root locus, Routh–Hurwitz, frequency-response and
lead/lag design, state-space representation, steady-state errors); K. Ogata, Modern
Control Engineering, 5th ed. (root-locus and frequency-response compensator design,
controllability/observability, Nyquist stability).
Question 8: Nyquist Criterion and State-Space Step Response (20 marks)
Given. Part A: $G_{open}(s)/K=(1+s)/[s(s-5)]$, an open-loop plant with ONE
pole at the origin and ONE pole in the right half-plane ($s=+5$). Part B: state matrices
$A=\begin{bmatrix}-1&1\\-3&-5\end{bmatrix}$, $B=\begin{bmatrix}-1\\0\end{bmatrix}$,
$C=\begin{bmatrix}0&1\end{bmatrix}$, unit step input, zero initial state.
Find. Part A: the polar-plot crossovers and the stabilizing range of
$K_p$. Part B: the closed-form $y(t)$.
Approach. Part A: evaluate $G_{open}(j\omega)/K$ directly to find where it
crosses the real and imaginary axes and its limiting behaviour as $\omega\to0^{+},\infty$; since
the open loop has one RHP pole ($P=1$), the Nyquist criterion needs exactly one CCW encirclement
of $-1/K$ for stability, which is cross-checked against the Routh–Hurwitz array on the
same characteristic equation. Part B: solve $Y(s)=C(sI-A)^{-1}Bu(s)$ and invert the Laplace
transform.
Part A.1) — polar-plot geometry. With $s=j\omega$,
$$\frac{G_{open}(j\omega)}{K}=\frac{1+j\omega}{j\omega(j\omega-5)}=\underbrace{\frac{-6}{\omega^2+25}}_{\text{Re}}
+j\underbrace{\frac{5-\omega^2}{\omega(\omega^2+25)}}_{\text{Im}}.$$
The REAL part is negative for every $\omega\ne0$ and never reaches zero, so the plot never
crosses the imaginary axis (except in the limits below). The IMAGINARY part vanishes at
$\omega=\sqrt5=2.236$ rad/s, where $\text{Re}=-6/(5+25)=\boxed{-0.20}$ — the plot's
one crossing of the real axis. As $\omega\to0^{+}$, $G_{open}/K\to j/(5\omega)\to\infty\angle{+}90^{\circ}$
(the plot departs upward along the positive imaginary axis); as $\omega\to\infty$,
$G_{open}/K\to1/(j\omega)\to0\angle{-}90^{\circ}$ (the plot spirals into the origin from the
negative-imaginary direction). Frequency increases from $0^{+}$ to $+\infty$ moving CLOCKWISE
around this path, passing through the real-axis crossing at $-0.20$ on the way.
Part A.2) — Nyquist stability range. The open-loop plant has ONE pole
in the right half-plane ($s=+5$) plus one pole at the origin needing the usual small indentation
in the $\Gamma$ contour, so $P=1$; for closed-loop stability $Z=N+P=0$ requires $N=-1$, i.e.
exactly one COUNTER-clockwise encirclement of the critical point $-1/K_p$. The real-axis
crossing at $-0.20$ found above is the only point where the normalized plot can straddle the
critical point as $K_p$ varies, so the encirclement count changes exactly there: solving
the SAME characteristic equation directly via Routh–Hurwitz,
$$s(s-5)+K_p(1+s)=0\ \Rightarrow\ s^2+(K_p-5)s+K_p=0,$$
requires both $K_p-5>0$ and $K_p>0$ for stability, i.e. $\boxed{K_p>5}$ — consistent
exactly with $-1/K_{crit}=-1/5=-0.20$, the crossing point identified in Part A.1, confirming
the encirclement analysis.
Part B) — state-space step response.
$$Y(s)=C(sI-A)^{-1}B\,\frac{1}{s}=\frac{3}{s(s^2+6s+8)}=\frac{3}{s(s+2)(s+4)}.$$
Partial fractions give $Y(s)=\dfrac{3/8}{s}-\dfrac{3/4}{s+2}+\dfrac{3/8}{s+4}$, so
$$\boxed{y(t)=\frac{3}{8}-\frac{3}{4}e^{-2t}+\frac{3}{8}e^{-4t}}\ ,\quad t\ge0,$$
which correctly satisfies $y(0)=3/8-3/4+3/8=0$ (matching $x(0)=0$) and settles at
$y_{ss}=\lim_{s\to0}sY(s)=\boxed{3/8=0.375}$.