NivaarExam PrepOfficial exam papers ↗

17-Phys-B6 Applied Thermodynamics and Heat Transfer · December 2013

Question 4 of 8: Freon-12 Vapour-Compression Refrigeration Cycle

Nivaar worked solution (AI-drafted; not reviewed by a licensed engineer)

Notes on this paper

Paper format. 98-Phys-B6 Applied Thermodynamics and Heat Transfer, National Examination December 2013 — a three-hour open-book examination; candidates are expected to bring both a thermodynamics text and a heat-transfer text to make use of the property tables. A complete examination is five questions — either three from Part A (Thermodynamics, Q1–Q4) and two from Part B (Heat Transfer, Q5–Q8), or two from Part A and three from Part B — every question carrying equal value; all eight are solved below as a complete study set. Candidates are invited to state any assumptions where a question is open to interpretation; this licence is used explicitly in Question 1(b) (standard air properties, not printed directly) and Question 7 (a printed convective "rate" read as a heat-transfer coefficient with a temperature unit omitted in print — the same omission the paper shows in Question 6's specific-heat units).

Reference texts. Y. A. Çengel and M. A. Boles, Thermodynamics: An Engineering Approach, 8th ed. (ideal-gas processes, vapour power cycles, gas-turbine/Brayton cycles, vapour-compression refrigeration); F. P. Incropera and D. P. DeWitt, Fundamentals of Heat and Mass Transfer, 7th ed. (conduction, natural convection, lumped-capacitance transient conduction, radiation exchange between surfaces, heat-exchanger LMTD analysis).

Question 4: Freon-12 Vapour-Compression Refrigeration Cycle

Question text not reproduced: the examination questions are © Engineers and Geoscientists BC. Open the official past paper (linked at the top of this page) to read the question, then follow the worked solution below.

Given. Mass flow rate 0.04 kg/s; compressor inlet 150 kPa/$-10\,{}^{\circ}\text{C}$; compressor exit 1.2 MPa/75°C; expansion-valve inlet 1.15 MPa/40°C (subcooled liquid, since $T_{\text{sat}}$ at 1.15 MPa is about $47\,{}^{\circ}\text{C}$); evaporator exit 175 kPa/$-15\,{}^{\circ}\text{C}$ (a distinct, slightly higher-pressure state than the compressor inlet — a realistic suction-line pressure drop); actual compressor power 1.9 kW.

Given data
StateDescriptionCondition
comp. inCompressor inlet150 kPa, $-10\,{}^{\circ}\text{C}$
comp. outCompressor exit1.2 MPa, $75\,{}^{\circ}\text{C}$
valve inExpansion-valve inlet1.15 MPa, $40\,{}^{\circ}\text{C}$
evap. outEvaporator exit175 kPa, $-15\,{}^{\circ}\text{C}$
—Mass flow rate$\dot m=0.04$ kg/s
—Actual compressor power$\dot W_c=1.9$ kW

Find. (a) $\Delta s$ across the compressor; (b) refrigeration capacity $\dot Q_{evap}$; (c) COP; (d) heat lost by the refrigerant per unit mass while passing through the compressor.

Entropy sTemperature TR-12 vapour-compression cycle, to scale12345
T–s diagram, drawn to scale from R-12 properties: 1→2 compression (150 kPa, $-10\,{}^{\circ}\text{C}$ to 1.2 MPa, $75\,{}^{\circ}\text{C}$; dashed — real, non-adiabatic) · 2→3 condenser (desuperheat, condense, subcool to $40\,{}^{\circ}\text{C}$ at 1.15 MPa) · 3→4 throttling valve (constant $h$, dashed) · 4→5 evaporator at 175 kPa to $-15\,{}^{\circ}\text{C}$ · 5→1 suction line (pressure drop to 150 kPa).

Approach. Read every state from the paper's own R-12 appendix (Appendix 2, superheated Freon-12; Appendix 3, saturated Freon-12), interpolating where a state falls between tabulated rows. The valve is isenthalpic, so the evaporator-inlet enthalpy equals the valve-inlet enthalpy. Compressor entropy change, the evaporator's own energy balance, COP, and the compressor's energy balance (with heat loss) follow directly. State numbers follow the figure: 1 compressor inlet, 2 compressor exit, 3 valve inlet, 4 evaporator inlet, 5 evaporator exit.

  1. State properties from the appendix.
    • State 1 (150 kPa, $-10\,{}^{\circ}\text{C}$; superheated, $T_{sat}\approx-20\,{}^{\circ}\text{C}$): tabulated directly in the 0.15 MPa column, $h_1=184.619$ kJ/kg, $s_1=0.7313$ kJ/kg·K.
    • State 2 (1.2 MPa, $75\,{}^{\circ}\text{C}$): midway between the 70 and $80\,{}^{\circ}\text{C}$ rows of the 1.20 MPa column, $h_2=(222.687+230.398)/2=226.543$ kJ/kg, $s_2=(0.7293+0.7514)/2=0.7404$ kJ/kg·K.
    • State 3 (1.15 MPa, $40\,{}^{\circ}\text{C}$): compressed liquid ($T_{sat}$ at 1.15 MPa is about $47\,{}^{\circ}\text{C}$), taken as saturated liquid at the same temperature, $h_3\approx h_f(40\,{}^{\circ}\text{C})=74.527$ kJ/kg.
    • State 5 (175 kPa, $-15\,{}^{\circ}\text{C}$): interpolating the saturation table between $-20\,{}^{\circ}\text{C}$ (0.1509 MPa) and $-15\,{}^{\circ}\text{C}$ (0.1825 MPa) gives $T_{sat}(175\text{ kPa})=-16.19\,{}^{\circ}\text{C}$ and $h_g=180.315$ kJ/kg, so the vapour is superheated by 1.19 K; with the vapour specific heat implied by the 0.10 MPa column, $(185.707-179.361)/10=0.635$ kJ/kg·K, $$h_5=180.315+0.635\times1.19=181.068\text{ kJ/kg}$$
  2. Part (a) — entropy change across the compressor. $$\boxed{\Delta s = s_2-s_1 = 0.7404-0.7313 = 0.0090\text{ kJ/kg}\cdot\text{K}}$$ A small positive change, consistent with an irreversible (non-isentropic) real compression; it is small because the heat the compressor loses (part (d)) carries entropy out.
  3. Part (b) — refrigeration capacity. The valve is throttled at constant enthalpy, so $h_4=h_3=74.527$ kJ/kg. The refrigeration effect is the enthalpy rise across the evaporator itself, from its inlet (state 4) to its own exit (state 5) — not to the compressor inlet, which lies downstream of a suction-line pressure drop: $$\dot Q_{evap} = \dot m\,(h_5-h_4) = 0.04\times(181.068-74.527) = 0.04\times106.541$$ $$\boxed{\dot Q_{evap} = 4.26\text{ kW}}$$
  4. Part (c) — coefficient of performance. COP uses the ACTUAL compressor power (given directly), not an ideal isentropic estimate: $$\boxed{\text{COP} = \frac{\dot Q_{evap}}{\dot W_c} = \frac{4.262}{1.9} = 2.24}$$
  5. Part (d) — heat lost through the compressor casing. The compressor's own enthalpy rise, $$\Delta h_{comp} = h_2-h_1 = 226.543-184.619 = 41.924\text{ kJ/kg}$$ is LESS than the actual specific work supplied, $$w_{in} = \frac{\dot W_c}{\dot m} = \frac{1.9}{0.04} = 47.500\text{ kJ/kg}$$ The steady-flow energy equation $q-w=\Delta h$ (with $w=-w_{in}$, work done on the fluid) gives $$q = \Delta h_{comp} - w_{in} = 41.924-47.500$$ $$\boxed{q = -5.58\text{ kJ/kg (a heat LOSS of about 5.6 kJ/kg to the surroundings)}}$$ The extra work supplied beyond the enthalpy rise leaves the refrigerant as heat through the compressor casing, rather than showing up as additional gas heating.

Check: Cross-check against a modern equation of state. Its absolute $h$ and $s$ values sit on a different reference state (about 165 kJ/kg and 0.86 kJ/kg·K above this appendix), which cancels in every difference used here. The differences give $\Delta s=0.0088$ kJ/kg·K, $\dot Q_{evap}=4.276$ kW, COP $=2.251$ and $q=-5.315$ kJ/kg — within 0.5% of the appendix-based capacity and COP. The heat loss differs by about 0.26 kJ/kg (5%) because it is a small difference between two large numbers (41.9 vs 47.5 kJ/kg). Answers from either property source are acceptable; the appendix values above are the ones this paper supplies.

Question 4 — results
QuantityValue
(a) $\Delta s$ across compressor0.0090 kJ/kg·K
(b) Refrigeration capacity $\dot Q_{evap}$4.26 kW
(c) COP2.24
(d) Compressor heat loss per unit mass5.58 kJ/kg