Question 5 of 8: Frame analysis by slope-deflection, with shear and bending moment diagrams
Nivaar worked solution (AI-drafted; not reviewed by a licensed engineer)
Notes on this paper
Paper format. National Examinations, December 2013
— 07-Str-A1 Elementary Structural Analysis. Three hours, CLOSED BOOK, an
approved Sharp or Casio calculator permitted. Six questions constitute a complete paper:
candidates answer ALL of Questions 1 to 5 and ONE of Questions 6, 7 or 8. Marks are shown in
the left margin (6 + 18 + 18 + 18 + 20 + 20 = 100). All eight questions are solved below,
because the three alternatives test different topics and the whole set is useful for
study.
Reference texts.
R. C. Hibbeler, Structural Analysis, 10th ed. — Ch. 2 (determinacy and
stability), Ch. 3 to 5 (trusses, internal loadings, frames), Ch. 6 (influence lines),
Ch. 8 to 9 (deflections and virtual work), Ch. 11 to 12 (slope-deflection and moment
distribution).
A. Kassimali, Structural Analysis, 6th ed. — Ch. 3 (equilibrium and
determinacy), Ch. 4 (plane trusses), Ch. 5 (beams and frames), Ch. 7 (deflections by virtual
work), Ch. 8 (influence lines), Ch. 16 to 17 (slope-deflection and moment distribution).
K. Leet, C.-M. Uang and A. Gilbert, Fundamentals of Structural Analysis, 5th ed.
— a parallel treatment of the same syllabus.
C. H. Norris, J. B. Wilbur and S. Utku, Elementary Structural Analysis, 4th ed.
— the classical text after which this exam code is named.
Canadian design context: CSA S16 Design of Steel Structures, CSA A23.3
Design of Concrete Structures and the National Building Code of Canada.
This is an analysis paper, so no code clause is needed to answer it, but every result below is
expressed in the SI units those documents use.
Sign conventions used throughout. For beams and for each individual frame
member, shear is positive when the resultant of the forces to the left of (or below) a section
acts upward, and bending moment is positive when it sags the member, that is when it puts the
underside of a beam or the inside face of a frame member in tension. Member end moments in the
slope-deflection work of Question 5 are clockwise-positive on the member, which is the usual
convention for that method. Truss forces are quoted as tension or compression rather than by
sign. Reactions are drawn in blue and applied loads in red on every figure.
A note on reading this paper. The figures are hand drawn and carry no dimensions that are not on the drawings, so the geometry of every structure below was read from the support symbols one at a time. Two readings materially affect the answers and are flagged
where they arise: the plane on which the roller of Question 2(c) bears, and the position of
the 50 kN load in Question 8.
Question 5: Frame analysis by slope-deflection, with shear and bending moment diagrams (20 marks)
6 kN/m over member 1–2; 16 kN at the middle of 2–3; 4 kN down at joint 4
Stiffness
One and the same EI throughout; members inextensible
Find. All member end moments, hence the shear force and bending moment diagrams with the maximum and minimum ordinate of each member.
The frame: built in at joint 1, pinned at joint 5, on a roller at joint 3 and cantilevering 1 m past it.
Shear force (kN, left) and bending moment (kN·m, right) for the whole frame; the column ordinate is drawn beside the column line.
Approach. Show first that the frame cannot sway, so the only unknowns are the rotations of joints 2 and 3. Write the four slope-deflection equations that contain them, add the two joint-moment equations, solve, and recover shears from member statics. The same numbers follow from moment distribution and the distribution table is given as a check.
Show that there is no sidesway. Members are inextensible, so joint
2 cannot move horizontally (member 1–2 ties it to the built-in joint 1) and cannot move
vertically (member 2–5 ties it to the pin at joint 5). Joint 3 cannot move horizontally
for the same reason through member 2–3, and its roller stops it moving vertically. The
kinematic unknowns are therefore only the rotations $\theta_{2}$ and $\theta_{3}$, and no
sway correction is needed — which is what makes the problem tractable by hand.
Replace the cantilever by its end action. Member 3–4 carries
4 kN at 1 m from joint 3, so it delivers a known 4 kN·m to the joint together with a
4 kN vertical force. In the clockwise-positive convention used throughout,
$$M_{34} = -4\ \text{kN}\cdot\text{m}$$
and joint 3 must satisfy $M_{32} + M_{34} = 0$, that is $M_{32} = +4$ kN·m.
Write the fixed-end moments. For the uniformly loaded member
1–2 and the centrally loaded member 2–3,
$$\begin{aligned} \text{FEM}_{12} &= -\frac{wL^{2}}{12} = -\frac{6(8)^{2}}{12} = -32\ \text{kN}\cdot\text{m} \\ \text{FEM}_{21} &= +32\ \text{kN}\cdot\text{m} \end{aligned}$$
$$\begin{aligned} \text{FEM}_{23} &= -\frac{PL}{8} = -\frac{16(6)}{8} = -12\ \text{kN}\cdot\text{m} \\ \text{FEM}_{32} &= +12\ \text{kN}\cdot\text{m} \end{aligned}$$
Member 2–5 carries no load, so both of its fixed-end moments are zero.
Set down the slope-deflection equations. With
$M_{AB} = (2EI/L)(2\theta_{A} + \theta_{B}) + \text{FEM}_{AB}$ and $\theta_{1} = 0$, and using
the modified form for member 2–5 because its far end is a pin free to rotate,
$$\begin{aligned} M_{12} &= 0.25\,EI\theta_{2} - 32 \\ M_{21} &= 0.5\,EI\theta_{2} + 32 \\ M_{25} &= EI\theta_{2} \end{aligned}$$
$$\begin{aligned} M_{23} &= \tfrac{1}{3}EI\,(2\theta_{2} + \theta_{3}) - 12 \\ M_{32} &= \tfrac{1}{3}EI\,(2\theta_{3} + \theta_{2}) + 12 \end{aligned}$$
Impose joint equilibrium and solve. Joint 2 carries three member
ends and joint 3 carries two, so
$$\begin{aligned} M_{21} + M_{25} + M_{23} &= 0 \\ M_{32} + M_{34} &= 0 \end{aligned}$$
which reduce to
$$\begin{aligned}
2.1667\,EI\theta_{2} + 0.3333\,EI\theta_{3} &= -20 \\
0.3333\,EI\theta_{2} + 0.6667\,EI\theta_{3} &= -8
\end{aligned}$$
and give the pleasingly simple result
$$\boxed{EI\theta_{2} = EI\theta_{3} = -8\ \text{kN}\cdot\text{m}^{2}}$$
Both joints rotate anticlockwise, which is what the sagging of the two loaded spans
demands.
Back-substitute for the end moments. Feeding the two rotations
back through the five equations,
$$M_{12} = -34, \quad M_{21} = +28, \quad M_{25} = -8, \quad M_{23} = -20,
\quad M_{32} = +4, \quad M_{34} = -4$$
all in kN·m. Joint 2 checks exactly, $28 - 8 - 20 = 0$, and joint 3 checks as
$4 - 4 = 0$. Moment distribution reproduces these figures: the distribution factors at
joint 2 are $0.5/2.1667 = 0.231$ to member 2–1, $1.0/2.1667 = 0.461$ to the column and
$0.667/2.1667 = 0.308$ to member 2–3, and joint 3 has a single distributing member so
its factor is unity against the known cantilever moment.
Recover the member shears. Take each member as a free body loaded
by its span load and its two end moments. For member 1–2,
$$\begin{aligned} V_{1} &= \frac{6(8)}{2} + \frac{M_{12} + M_{21}}{-8}
= 24 + \frac{-34 + 28}{-8} = 24.75\ \text{kN}\uparrow \\ V_{2} &= 48 - 24.75 = 23.25\ \text{kN} \end{aligned}$$
For member 2–3 the same treatment gives 10.67 kN at joint 2 and 5.33 kN at joint 3, the
column carries a constant shear of $8/3 = 2.67$ kN, and the cantilever carries 4 kN
throughout.
Assemble the reactions. The built-in end takes
$$\begin{aligned} V_{1} &= 24.75\ \text{kN}\uparrow \\ H_{1} &= 2.67\ \text{kN}\rightarrow \\ M_{1} &= 34\ \text{kN}\cdot\text{m} \end{aligned}$$
the roller at joint 3 takes $5.33 + 4 = 9.33$ kN upward, and the pin at joint 5 takes
$23.25 + 10.67 = 33.92$ kN upward together with 2.67 kN to the left. Vertical equilibrium
closes on the total applied load, $24.75 + 9.33 + 33.92 = 68.0$ kN, which is
$6(8) + 16 + 4$.
Locate the extreme ordinates. On member 1–2 the shear passes
through zero at $x = 24.75/6 = 4.125$ m, where
$$M = -34 + 24.75(4.125) - 3(4.125)^{2} = \boxed{+17.05\ \text{kN}\cdot\text{m}}$$
and the moment is zero at $x = 1.741$ m and $x = 6.509$ m. The most negative ordinate on the
whole frame is the built-in moment, $-34.0$ kN·m. On member 2–3 the moment runs
from $-20$ kN·m at joint 2 up to $-20 + 10.67(3) = +12.0$ kN·m under the 16 kN
load and back to $-4.0$ kN·m at joint 3, which matches the cantilever exactly. The
column varies linearly from $-8.0$ kN·m at joint 2 to zero at the pin.