Question 6 of 8: Two-storey frame by slope-deflection
Nivaar worked solution (AI-drafted; not reviewed by a licensed engineer)
Notes on this paper
Paper format. National Examinations,
December 2014 — 07-Str-A1 Elementary Structural Analysis. Three
hours, CLOSED BOOK, an approved Sharp or Casio calculator permitted. Six
questions constitute a complete paper: answer ALL of Questions 1 to 5, and ONE
of Questions 6, 7 or 8. Marks are shown in the left margin
(6 + 18 + 18 + 18 + 20 + 20 = 100). All eight questions are solved below,
because the three alternatives test quite different methods
— moment distribution, statics of a three-hinged frame, and virtual work
— and the complete set is the more useful study resource.
Reference texts.
R. C. Hibbeler, Structural Analysis, 10th ed. — Ch. 2
(determinacy and stability), Ch. 3–5 (trusses, internal loadings, frames),
Ch. 6 (influence lines), Ch. 8–9 (deflections and virtual work),
Ch. 11–12 (slope-deflection and moment distribution).
A. Kassimali, Structural Analysis, 6th ed. — Ch. 3
(equilibrium and determinacy), Ch. 4 (plane trusses), Ch. 5 (beams and frames),
Ch. 7 (deflections by virtual work), Ch. 8–9 (influence lines),
Ch. 16–17 (slope-deflection and moment distribution).
K. Leet, C.-M. Uang and A. Gilbert, Fundamentals of Structural
Analysis, 5th ed. — a parallel treatment of the same syllabus.
C. H. Norris, J. B. Wilbur and S. Utku, Elementary Structural
Analysis, 4th ed. — the classical text this exam code is named after.
Check: support types were read from the printed drawings, not from the text. Every support symbol, internal hinge and member line quoted below was taken from the drawings. In this subject the drawings carry data that appears nowhere
in the printed text, and the classification in Question 1 in particular turns
entirely on telling a pin (plain triangle on hatching) from a roller (triangle
over rollers) and a rigid joint from a hinge (small open circle).
Question 6: Two-storey frame by slope-deflection (20 marks)
Questions 6, 7 and 8 are alternatives — the
paper asks for one. All three are solved here because they exercise
different methods.
Given. A frame consisting of a continuous vertical column
carrying two 12 m beams that cantilever to the left.
Given data
Member
Length
Relative $EI$
Loading
Column 1–3
3 m
$EI$
none
Column 3–5
3 m
$EI$
none
Column 5–6
3 m
$EI$
none
Beam 2–3
12 m
$3EI$
6 kN/m downward
Beam 4–5
12 m
$3EI$
6 kN/m downward
Supports: pins at nodes 1 and 6 (top and bottom of the
column); built-in ends at nodes 2 and 4 (far ends of the two beams). All members
inextensible.
Find. The end moments in every member, and shear force and
bending moment diagrams labelled with the maximum and minimum ordinates.
Frame for Question 6, with the bending moment diagram for each 12 m beam (the two are identical) and the column moments listed.
Approach. Show first that the frame cannot sway, so the only
kinematic unknowns are the rotations at the two beam-to-column joints; write the
slope-deflection equations with the modified stiffness $3EI/L$ for the two
column lengths that end at a pinned support; solve the two joint-equilibrium
equations; then back-substitute for the member end moments and diagrams.
Rule out sidesway. The column is pinned at both ends and is
inextensible, so nodes 3 and 5 cannot move vertically. Both beams are horizontal
and inextensible and are built in at their far ends, so nodes 3 and 5 cannot
move horizontally either. Every joint translation is therefore prevented and the
only unknowns are $\theta_{3}$ and $\theta_{5}$. This is what the phrase
"members are inextensible" in the question is there to license.
Fixed-end moments. Only the two beams are loaded, each by a
uniform 6 kN/m over 12 m:
$$\text{FEM} = \frac{wL^{2}}{12} = \frac{6(12)^{2}}{12}
= 72\ \text{kN}\cdot\text{m}$$
so $M^{F}_{23} = M^{F}_{45} = -72$ and
$M^{F}_{32} = M^{F}_{54} = +72\ \text{kN}\cdot\text{m}$,
taking clockwise moments on the member ends as positive.
Slope-deflection equations. With relative
$EI$ values and no joint translation, and using the modified stiffness
$3EI/L$ for members 1–3 and 5–6 because each has a pinned far end
carrying no other member,
$$M_{32} = \tfrac{2(3EI)}{12}(2\theta_{3}) + 72 = EI\theta_{3} + 72,
\qquad M_{31} = \tfrac{3EI}{3}\theta_{3} = EI\theta_{3}$$
$$M_{35} = \tfrac{2EI}{3}(2\theta_{3} + \theta_{5}), \qquad
M_{53} = \tfrac{2EI}{3}(2\theta_{5} + \theta_{3})$$
with the mirror-image pair at node 5.
Joint equilibrium. Setting
$M_{31} + M_{32} + M_{35} = 0$ and $M_{53} + M_{54} + M_{56} = 0$ gives
$$\tfrac{10}{3}EI\theta_{3} + \tfrac{2}{3}EI\theta_{5} = -72, \qquad
\tfrac{2}{3}EI\theta_{3} + \tfrac{10}{3}EI\theta_{5} = -72$$
The two equations are symmetric, so
$$\boxed{EI\theta_{3} = EI\theta_{5} = -18\ \text{kN}\cdot\text{m}}$$
Both joints rotate anticlockwise, which is what a downward load on a beam
cantilevering to the left must do.
Member end moments. Substituting back,
$$M_{23} = -81, \quad M_{32} = +54, \quad M_{31} = -18, \quad
M_{35} = -36\ \text{kN}\cdot\text{m}$$
$$M_{53} = -36, \quad M_{54} = +54, \quad M_{45} = -81, \quad
M_{56} = -18\ \text{kN}\cdot\text{m}$$
with $M_{13} = M_{65} = 0$ at the two pins. Both joint sums check to zero:
$54 - 18 - 36 = 0$. An independent direct-stiffness solution of the same frame
reproduces all eight moments exactly.
Beam shear and moment diagrams. For each 12 m beam, taking
moments about one end,
$$R_{\text{column end}} = \frac{M_{23} + M_{32} + wL^{2}/2}{L}
= \frac{-81 + 54 + 432}{12} = 33.75\ \text{kN}$$
so the shear runs from $+38.25$ kN at the built-in end to $-33.75$ kN at the
column, crossing zero at $x = 38.25/6 = 6.375$ m. The moment there is
$$M_{\max} = -81 + 38.25(6.375) - 3(6.375)^{2}
= \boxed{+40.92\ \text{kN}\cdot\text{m}}$$
between hogging values of $\boxed{-81\ \text{kN}\cdot\text{m}}$ at the
built-in end and $-54\ \text{kN}\cdot\text{m}$ at the column.
Column shear and moment diagrams. Each column length
carries no transverse load, so its shear is constant and equal to the sum of its
end moments divided by its length:
$$V_{13} = \frac{0 + 18}{3} = 6\ \text{kN}, \qquad
V_{35} = \frac{36 + 36}{3} = \boxed{24\ \text{kN}}, \qquad
V_{56} = \frac{18 + 0}{3} = 6\ \text{kN}$$
The moment varies linearly from $0$ to $-18\ \text{kN}\cdot\text{m}$ over
1–3, from $-36$ to $+36\ \text{kN}\cdot\text{m}$ over 3–5 with a
point of contraflexure exactly at mid-height, and from
$-18\ \text{kN}\cdot\text{m}$ back to $0$ over 5–6.
Question 6 — member end moments and diagram ordinates
Member
Near-end moment
Far-end moment
Shear
Beam 2–3
$-81\ \text{kN}\cdot\text{m}$
$+54\ \text{kN}\cdot\text{m}$
$+38.25$ to $-33.75$ kN
Beam 4–5
$-81\ \text{kN}\cdot\text{m}$
$+54\ \text{kN}\cdot\text{m}$
$+38.25$ to $-33.75$ kN
Column 1–3
$0$
$-18\ \text{kN}\cdot\text{m}$
6 kN
Column 3–5
$-36\ \text{kN}\cdot\text{m}$
$-36\ \text{kN}\cdot\text{m}$
24 kN
Column 5–6
$-18\ \text{kN}\cdot\text{m}$
$0$
6 kN
Maximum sagging moment in each beam:
$+40.92\ \text{kN}\cdot\text{m}$ at 6.375 m from the built-in end.