NivaarExam PrepOfficial exam papers ↗

07-Str-A1 · Undated paper

Question 7 of 8: Trapezoidal frame with a crown hinge

Nivaar worked solution (AI-drafted; not reviewed by a licensed engineer)

Notes on this paper

Paper format. National Professional Examinations — 07-Str-A1 Elementary Structural Analysis; 3 hours, CLOSED BOOK (an approved Casio or Sharp calculator is permitted). The paper carries eight questions: answer all of Questions 1–5 (6, 24, 16, 16 and 6 + 10 marks) and one only of Questions 6, 7 or 8 (22 marks each), for 100 marks. All three optional questions are worked below, because the complete set is the more useful study resource.

Reference texts. R. C. Hibbeler, Structural Analysis (Ch. 2 determinacy and stability; Ch. 4 shear and moment diagrams; Ch. 6 influence lines; Ch. 8–9 virtual work; Ch. 11 slope deflection); A. Kassimali, Structural Analysis (Ch. 3, 5, 8, 13, 16); K. Leet, C.-M. Uang and A. Gilbert, Fundamentals of Structural Analysis; J. C. McCormac, Structural Analysis: Using Classical and Matrix Methods. For Canadian practice the companion documents are the National Building Code of Canada (Part 4, load combinations) and CSA S16 Design of Steel Structures; this paper is pure analysis, so no design code is invoked in the answers below.

Check

Three figure readings are stated here once and used throughout. (1) In Question 2(b) the two hatched load blocks are drawn from the left end of the beam to the first roller and from the second-last roller to the right end — that is, 0 to 7 m and 13 to 20 m, not merely over the bays named by the dimension string. (2) In Question 2(c) the upper 20 kN acts leftwards at the top of the 1 m riser and the lower 20 kN acts rightwards at its foot, so the applied action is a pure couple and the roller reaction is a hold-down. (3) In Question 6 the 5 kN/m ruling spans the full 16 m width of the sketch, so it is a load on the horizontal projection covering both overhangs and the inclined member. Each reading is the one that makes the arithmetic close on round numbers, which is the usual confirmation on this paper.

Question 7: Trapezoidal frame with a crown hinge (22 marks)

Question text not reproduced: the examination questions are © Engineers and Geoscientists BC. Open the official past paper (linked at the top of this page) to read the question, then follow the worked solution below.

Given. A trapezoidal frame with pinned bases 10 m apart at nodes 1 (0, 0) and 5 (10, 0), and a horizontal top reach 5 m long between nodes 2 (2.5, 6) and 4 (7.5, 6), so each inclined leg spans 2.5 m horizontally over a 6 m rise and is 6.5 m long. An internal hinge is drawn at node 3, the mid-point of the top reach. A downward uniform load of 16 kN/m runs over the whole top reach 2–4, and a horizontal uniform load of 10 kN/m acts leftwards on member 4–5 over its 6 m vertical projection.

Find. The four reaction components, and the shear and bending-moment diagrams for each member with the extreme ordinates labelled.

16 kN/m10 kN/mon 4-523 (hinge)4156 m2.5 m2.5 m2.5 m2.5 mnode 1: 58 kN up, 40 kN rightnode 5: 22 kN up, 20 kN rightDeveloped shear V (kN) along 1-2-3-4-5+58−22+28.5−26.9Developed moment M (kN·m) along 1-2-3-4-5−95+10.1+42.5
Question 7 — the frame with its reactions, then the developed shear and moment diagrams along the chain 1-2-3-4-5. The moment passes through exactly zero at the crown hinge, which is the check on the reactions.

Approach. Four unknown reaction components against three equations plus the hinge condition, so the frame is determinate: take global moments for the vertical reactions, then moments about the hinge for one half to split the horizontal thrust, and finally walk the member chain accumulating shear and moment.

  1. Resolve the applied loading. The vertical load totals $16(5) = 80$ kN acting at $x = 5$ m, the centre of the top reach. The horizontal load totals $10(6) = 60$ kN acting leftwards, and because it is distributed over the vertical projection of the leg its resultant sits at mid-height, $y = 3$ m. Determinacy is $r = 4$ against $3 + 1 = 4$ equations.
  2. Global moments about node 1 give the vertical reactions. A horizontal force contributes a moment equal to force times height, so $$\sum M_1 = 0:\qquad 10\,E_y - 80(5) + 60(3) = 0$$ $$E_y = \frac{400 - 180}{10} = \boxed{22.0\ \text{kN up}},\qquad A_y = 80 - 22 = \boxed{58.0\ \text{kN up}}$$ Horizontal equilibrium fixes only the sum, $A_x + E_x = 60$ kN.
  3. The hinge condition splits the thrust. Take the free body to the right of node 3 — the half reach 3–4, the leg 4–5 and the pin at node 5 — and set the moment about the hinge to zero. That free body carries $16(2.5) = 40$ kN of vertical load at $x = 6.25$ m and the whole 60 kN horizontal load at $y = 3$ m: $$\sum M_3 = 0:\qquad 22(5) + 6E_x - 40(1.25) - 60(3) = 0$$ $$E_x = \frac{50 + 180 - 110}{6} = \boxed{20.0\ \text{kN}},\qquad A_x = 60 - 20 = \boxed{40.0\ \text{kN}}$$ both acting to the right. Repeating the calculation on the left-hand free body returns zero identically, which is the check that the vertical reactions were right.
  4. Leg 1–2 carries no transverse load, so its diagrams are straight. Resolving the reaction $(40, 58)$ along and normal to the leg's unit vector $(2.5, 6)/6.5$, $$N = -(40)(0.3846) - (58)(0.9231) = -68.9\ \text{kN} \ \ (\text{compression}),\qquad V = -14.6\ \text{kN}.$$ The shear is constant, so the moment grows linearly from zero at the pin to $14.6(6.5) = 95.0$ kN·m at the knee. Confirming it directly, the moment of the reaction about node 2 is $58(2.5) - 40(6) = -95$ kN·m, hogging: $$\boxed{M_2 = -95.0\ \text{kN}\cdot\text{m}}$$
  5. Top reach 2–4. Measuring $x$ from node 1's vertical, $$M(x) = 58x - 40(6) - 8(x - 2.5)^{2},\qquad V(x) = 58 - 16(x - 2.5).$$ The shear runs from $+58$ kN at node 2 through $+18$ kN at the hinge to $-22$ kN at node 4. The moment starts at $-95$ kN·m, passes through exactly zero at the hinge — the arithmetic check on the whole solution — peaks at the point of zero shear, $$x = 2.5 + \frac{58}{16} = 6.125\ \text{m},\qquad M_{\max} = \boxed{+10.1\ \text{kN}\cdot\text{m}}$$ and closes at $-5.0$ kN·m at node 4.
  6. Leg 4–5 carries the horizontal load. Working up from the pin, at height $y$ the moment is $$M(y) = \left(\frac{22(2.5)}{6} + 20\right)y - 5y^{2} = 29.17y - 5y^{2},$$ which is zero at the pin, reaches its peak where $\mathrm{d}M/\mathrm{d}y = 0$, i.e. at $y = 2.92$ m, $$M_{\max} = \boxed{+42.5\ \text{kN}\cdot\text{m}}$$ and closes on $-5.0$ kN·m at node 4, matching the top reach across the rigid knee. The corresponding developed shear runs from $+28.5$ kN at node 4 to $-26.9$ kN at the pin, passing through zero at the same height.
  7. Name the extremes member by member. The governing hogging moment is the 95.0 kN·m at knee 2, and the governing sagging moment is the 42.5 kN·m in the windward leg — four times the 10.1 kN·m peak in the beam. That inversion is the point of the question: the horizontal load, not the gravity load, controls this frame, and a candidate who sketches the diagrams by analogy with a simple portal will put the peak in the wrong member.
Question 7 — reactions and diagram extremes
QuantityValue
Reaction at pin 158.0 kN up, 40.0 kN right
Reaction at pin 522.0 kN up, 20.0 kN right
Leg 1–2: shear / axial−14.6 kN constant / 68.9 kN compression
Leg 1–2: moment0 at the pin to −95.0 kN·m at knee 2
Reach 2–3–4: shear+58.0 kN to −22.0 kN
Reach 2–3–4: moment−95.0, zero at the hinge, +10.1 peak, −5.0 at knee 4
Leg 4–5: shear+28.5 kN to −26.9 kN
Leg 4–5: moment−5.0 at knee 4, +42.5 kN·m peak at y = 2.92 m, 0 at the pin