Question 5 of 7: Moment and shear resistances of a triple-T floor section
Nivaar worked solution (AI-drafted; not reviewed by a licensed engineer)
Notes on this paper
Paper format. 07-Str-A2 Elementary Structural Design, National
Examinations May 2013, three-hour duration. The paper is printed on three pages: page 1 carries
the notes and the marking scheme, page 2 the seven questions, page 3 the five hand-drawn figures.
Part A (steel, questions A1–A3), Part B (reinforced concrete, questions B1–B3) and
Part C (timber, question C1) are answered by doing two of three from Part A, two of
three from Part B and the one question in Part C — five solutions in all, all
questions of equal value. Because this set is a study resource, all seven questions are
solved below. Note 3 of the paper fixes the design standards: steel to CSA S16, concrete
to CSA A23.3, timber to CSA O86 (latest editions). Note 6 states that all loads shown are
unfactored.
Reference texts. CSA S16, Design of Steel Structures, with the
CISC Handbook of Steel Construction (section tables, Class H HSS, fillet-weld tables);
CSA A23.3, Design of Concrete Structures; CSA O86, Engineering Design in Wood,
with the CWC Wood Design Manual; National Building Code of Canada (load combinations);
MacGregor and Bartlett, Reinforced Concrete: Mechanics and Design (Canadian edition);
Salmon, Johnson and Malhas, Steel Structures: Design and Behavior.
Check — load factors used throughout. The
paper states that all loads shown are unfactored but nowhere splits them into dead and live.
Every applied load in Figures A2, B1, B2 and B3 is therefore taken as a specified live load
and factored by 1.5, and self-weight (where the question asks for it)
by 1.25, per NBCC load combination case 2, 1.25D +
1.5L. If a grader intends a different split the factored actions scale linearly and every
design step below is unchanged. Self-weight of the steel members in A2 and A3 is neglected; for the
W610x241 of A2 it would add about 4 per cent to the moment at B.
Question B2: Moment and shear resistances of a triple-T floor section (12 + 8 marks)
Given. Flange 1600 mm wide x 200 mm thick; three stems 200 mm wide at
700 mm centres, total depth $h = 810$ mm; tension steel 6-25M ($6 \times 500 = 3\,000$
mm2) in the stem bottoms with 65 mm to bar centres, so $d = 810-65 = 745$ mm; 6-15M in
the flange; 15M closed stirrups. $f'_c = 35$ MPa, $f_y = 400$ MPa, $\phi_c = 0.65$,
$\phi_s = 0.85$, $\alpha_1 = 0.7975$, $\beta_1 = 0.8825$.
Find. Part (i): the factored moment resistance $M_R$ for positive (sagging)
bending. Part (ii): the factored shear resistance $V_R$.
The triple-T section of Figure B2. Sagging bending puts the 1600 mm flange in compression and the six 25M bars in the stem bottoms in tension; the three 200 mm stems act together as a 600 mm web for shear.
Approach. Assume the steel yields, find the depth of the stress block
from horizontal equilibrium, confirm it lies inside the flange so the section behaves as a
rectangle 1600 mm wide, and take moments about the compressive resultant. For shear, add the three
stem widths into one web and apply the simplified method.
Tension force at yield. Taking the flange steel as neutral (it lies in the
compression zone and is conservatively ignored),
$$T=\phi_s f_y A_s = 0.85(400)(3\,000)=1\,020\ \text{kN}$$
Depth of the compression block. Equating $T$ to the compressive force in a
flange of full width $b = 1\,600$ mm,
$$a=\frac{T}{\alpha_1\phi_c f'_c b}=\frac{1\,020\times10^{3}}{0.7975(0.65)(35)(1\,600)}
=35.1\ \text{mm}$$
Since $a = 35.1$ mm is well inside the 200 mm flange, none of the stems is in compression and the
section may be analysed as a rectangular beam 1600 mm wide.
Confirm ductility. The neutral axis lies at $c = a/\beta_1 = 39.8$ mm, so
the strain in the outermost bars at crushing of the concrete is
$$\varepsilon_s = 0.0035\,\frac{d-c}{c}=0.0035\left(\frac{745-39.8}{39.8}\right)=0.062$$
about thirty times the yield strain of 0.0020, which confirms the assumption that the steel yields
and shows the section is very heavily under-reinforced.
Part (i) — moment resistance. Taking moments about the centroid of
the compressive block,
$$M_R = T\left(d-\frac{a}{2}\right)=1\,020\times10^{3}\left(745-\frac{35.1}{2}\right)
=\boxed{742\ \text{kN}\cdot\text{m}}$$
The minimum-steel requirement is satisfied comfortably:
$A_{s,min}=0.2\sqrt{f'_c}\,b_t h/f_y$ with $b_t = 600$ mm gives $1\,438$ mm2 against the
3 000 mm2 provided.
Part (ii) — the concrete contribution to shear. The three stems act
as a single web of $b_w = 3(200) = 600$ mm, and
$d_v = \max(0.9d,\,0.72h) = \max(670.5,\,583.2) = 670.5$ mm. With minimum stirrups present the
simplified method gives $\beta = 0.18$ and $\theta = 35^{\circ}$:
$$V_c=\phi_c\lambda\beta\sqrt{f'_c}\,b_w d_v = 0.65(1.0)(0.18)\sqrt{35}(600)(670.5)=278\ \text{kN}$$
Steel contribution and the total. Two 15M legs in each of the three stems
give $A_v = 6(200) = 1\,200$ mm2 per set, so
$$V_s=\frac{\phi_s A_v f_y d_v\cot\theta}{s}=\frac{0.85(1\,200)(400)(670.5)(1.428)}{s}
=\frac{3.907\times10^{8}}{s}\ \text{N}$$
At a practical detailing spacing of 300 mm this is 1 302 kN, so
$$V_R = V_c+V_s = 278+1\,302=\boxed{1\,580\ \text{kN}}$$
which is below the web-crushing ceiling $V_{r,max}=0.25\phi_c f'_c b_w d_v = 2\,288$ kN, so the
result is valid.
Report the sensitivity to spacing. Because the figure dimensions the
stirrup size but not its spacing, the shear resistance is quoted as a function of $s$: 1 953 kN of
steel contribution at 200 mm, 1 302 kN at 300 mm and 833 kN at the maximum permitted
$s=\min(0.7d_v,600)=469$ mm, giving $V_R$ of 2 231, 1 580 and 1 111 kN respectively (the first is
capped by $V_{r,max}=2\,288$ kN). In every case the section is many times stronger in shear than in
flexure, which is normal for a stemmed floor unit.
Check — stirrup spacing. Figure B2 labels the
stirrups 15M but does not dimension their spacing, and the paper gives no further information.
$V_R$ above is therefore reported at an assumed 300 mm spacing with the full range tabulated. The
concrete contribution, 278 kN, and the crushing ceiling, 2 288 kN, are independent of the
assumption.