NivaarExam PrepOfficial exam papers ↗

07-Str-A2 · December 2017

Question 1 of 7: A1 — Moments of resistance of a plated Z-section

Nivaar worked solution (AI-drafted; not reviewed by a licensed engineer)

Notes on this paper

Paper format. National Examinations, December 2017 — 07-Str-A2 Elementary Structural Design. Three hours, closed book (handbooks and textbooks permitted). Seven questions in three parts: Part A (A1–A3, steel), Part B (B1–B3, reinforced concrete) and Part C (C1, timber). The candidate answers two from Part A, two from Part B and the single Part C question — five solutions of equal value. All seven are solved here, because the set is a study resource. Page 1 states that all loads shown are unfactored, so every question below applies its own load combination.

Reference texts and standards.

Check: figure page. All five figures are hand-drawn on page 3 of the paper. Every dimension used below was read from the printed figures, cross-checked against the labelled dimension chains (for example 200 overhang + 3 × 200 stems + 2 × 600 voids + 200 overhang = 2200 in Figure B3). Where the exam leaves a quantity undimensioned (the tie length in Figure A3, member thicknesses in Figure B1) the assumption is stated in the question concerned, as NOTE 1 on page 1 invites.

Question 1: A1 — Moments of resistance of a plated Z-section (12 + 8 = 20 marks)

Question text not reproduced: the examination questions are © Engineers and Geoscientists BC. Open the official past paper (linked at the top of this page) to read the question, then follow the worked solution below.

Given.

QuantityValue
Plate thickness (all elements)25 mm
Horizontal plate500 mm wide (250 + 250 about b-b)
Legs (one down at the left end, one up at the right end)200 mm long each
Steel grade G40.21 350WFy = 350 MPa
Lateral restraintfull (no lateral-torsional buckling)
Resistance factor, S16 13.1φ = 0.90

Find. The factored moments of resistance $M_{r,aa}$ and $M_{r,bb}$ about the two centroidal axes drawn on the figure.

a-ab-b250250200200
Figure A1 - Z-shaped section built from 25 mm plates: 500 x 25 horizontal plate, one 200 mm leg down at the left end and one 200 mm leg up at the right end. The section is centro-symmetric, so a-a and b-b are centroidal.

Approach. Locate the centroid (immediate, because the section is centro-symmetric), classify every plate element to S16 Table 2, and because the section is Class 2 compute the resistance from the plastic section modulus, $M_r=\phi Z F_y$, about each axis in turn.

  1. Establish the centroid and confirm the drawn axes. The section is made of three rectangles: the 500 × 25 horizontal plate, a 25 × 200 leg hanging below its left end, and an identical leg rising above its right end. Rotating the section 180° about the mid-point of the plate maps it onto itself, so the section is centro-symmetric and its centroid is that mid-point. The a-a and b-b axes drawn on Figure A1 are therefore already the centroidal axes, as the question implies. The gross area is $$A_g = 500(25) + 2(25)(200) = 12\,500 + 10\,000 = \boxed{22\,500\ \text{mm}^2}$$
  2. Second moments of area about a-a and b-b. Taking each rectangle about its own centroid and transferring, with the leg centroids 112.5 mm above and below a-a and 237.5 mm either side of b-b:$$I_{aa}=\frac{500(25)^3}{12}+2\left[\frac{25(200)^3}{12}+5000(112.5)^2\right]=160.5\times10^{6}\ \text{mm}^4$$$$I_{bb}=\frac{25(500)^3}{12}+2\left[\frac{200(25)^3}{12}+5000(237.5)^2\right]=825.0\times10^{6}\ \text{mm}^4$$ The extreme fibres lie 212.5 mm from a-a and 250 mm from b-b, so the elastic moduli are $S_{aa}=756\times10^{3}$ mm3 and $S_{bb}=3300\times10^{3}$ mm3.
  3. Classify the elements (S16 Table 2). The governing element is a leg projecting 200 mm from the plate that supports it, so it is an outstand with $b/t = 200/25 = 8.00$. For $F_y=350$ MPa the outstand limits are $145/\sqrt{F_y}=7.75$ (Class 1) and $170/\sqrt{F_y}=9.09$ (Class 2). Since $7.75 < 8.00 \le 9.09$ the legs are Class 2. The horizontal plate has the neutral axis inside it for both cases and $h/w = 500/25 = 20$, far below the Class 1 web limit $1100/\sqrt{F_y}=58.8$. The section is therefore Class 2 overall, which still permits the plastic moment to be developed (only the rotation capacity for plastic analysis is lost).
  4. Plastic section moduli by equal areas. The plastic neutral axis splits the area in half. About a-a, the material above the axis is the upper half of the plate plus the whole upper leg, $6250 + 5000 = 11\,250$ mm2, exactly $A_g/2$ — so the plastic axis coincides with a-a, and by the same argument with b-b. (This is a direct consequence of the centro-symmetry; it does not hold for a general built-up section, where the equal-area axis and the elastic centroid differ.) Summing $A_i|y_i|$:$$Z_{aa}=2\left[6250(6.25)\right]+2\left[5000(112.5)\right]=\boxed{1203\times10^{3}\ \text{mm}^3}$$$$Z_{bb}=2\left[6250(125)\right]+2\left[5000(237.5)\right]=\boxed{3938\times10^{3}\ \text{mm}^3}$$ The shape factors are $Z_{aa}/S_{aa}=1.59$ and $Z_{bb}/S_{bb}=1.19$ — the first is very high because for bending about a-a almost the whole plate area sits on the neutral axis and contributes nothing elastically.
  5. Moments of resistance. With full lateral restraint there is no lateral-torsional buckling to reduce the capacity, so S16 13.5 applies directly for a Class 2 section:$$M_{r,aa}=\phi Z_{aa}F_y = 0.90(1203\times10^{3})(350)=\boxed{379\ \text{kN}\cdot\text{m}}$$$$M_{r,bb}=\phi Z_{bb}F_y = 0.90(3938\times10^{3})(350)=\boxed{1240\ \text{kN}\cdot\text{m}}$$ Bending about the vertical axis b-b is over three times stronger, because both legs and the full width of the plate are then working at a long lever arm.
QuantityAxis a-aAxis b-b
Second moment of area, $I$160.5 × 106 mm4825.0 × 106 mm4
Elastic modulus, $S$756 × 103 mm33300 × 103 mm3
Plastic modulus, $Z$1203 × 103 mm33938 × 103 mm3
Element classClass 2Class 2
Moment of resistance, $M_r$379 kN·m1240 kN·m

Check: a-a and b-b are centroidal but not principal. For this Z-shape the product of inertia about the drawn axes is $I_{ab} = 2(5000)(237.5)(112.5) = 267\times10^{6}$ mm4, which is not zero. A moment applied purely about a-a therefore also produces curvature about b-b (unsymmetrical bending), and a rigorous check of a real member would resolve the loading onto the principal axes. The question asks specifically for the resistances about a-a and b-b with full lateral restraint, which is what is reported; the restraint is what makes that framing legitimate, since it suppresses the lateral response.

← Paper overview