NivaarExam PrepOfficial exam papers ↗

07-Str-A2 · May 2017

Question 1 of 7: A1 — Welded moment connection of a cantilever to a column flange

Nivaar worked solution (AI-drafted; not reviewed by a licensed engineer)

Notes on this paper

Paper format. National Examinations, May 2017 — 07-Str-A2 Elementary Structural Design. Three hours, closed book (handbooks and textbooks permitted). Seven questions in three parts: Part A (A1–A3, structural steel to CSA S16), Part B (B1–B3, reinforced concrete to CSA A23.3) and Part C (C1, timber to CSA O86). A candidate answers two from Part A, two from Part B and the one question in Part C — five solutions of equal value, with the page-1 mark split A1 (12+8), A2 (8+12), A3 (8+12), B1 (12+8), B2 (10+8+2), B3 (12+8), C1 (8+6+6). All seven are solved here, because the set is a study resource rather than a sitting.

Reference texts.

Load factors. NOTE 6 on page 1 states that all loads shown are unfactored. The point loads drawn on Figures A1, B1 and B2 are occupancy loads, so they are factored by 1.5; the only dead load anywhere in this paper is the concrete self-weight of the Question B2 beam, which takes 1.25. This follows NBCC combination 2, 1.25D + 1.5L.

Check — figure page. Two figure readings are flagged where they arise: in Figure B1 the 350 kN load acts at midspan of beam BA (3.5 m from B), not at joint B; and the 80 kN horizontal load acts 4 m below B, i.e. 6 m above the pin at C.

Question 1: A1 — Welded moment connection of a cantilever to a column flange (12 + 8 marks)

Question text not reproduced: the examination questions are © Engineers and Geoscientists BC. Open the official past paper (linked at the top of this page) to read the question, then follow the worked solution below.

Given.

QuantityValue
Cantilever beamW530×92, G40.21 350W — d = 533 mm, b = 209 mm, t = 15.6 mm, w = 10.2 mm, Zx = 2360×103 mm3
Supporting columnW610×241, G40.21 350W — d = 635 mm, b = 329 mm, t = 31.0 mm, w = 17.9 mm
Loads (unfactored, from Figure A1)100 kN at 1.0 m from A; 200 kN at the free end B, 3.0 m from A
SteelFy = 350 MPa, φ = 0.90
Weld metalE49xx, Xu = 490 MPa, φw = 0.67

Find. The factored moment and shear that the joint at A must carry, and a welded detail — weld type, size and length — capable of delivering both into the column flange, together with any column reinforcement the flange force demands.

Column W610×241Beam W530×92flange + web welds100 kN200 kNAB1 m2 mcantilever
Figure A1 — cantilevered beam AB welded to the column flange at A; loads unfactored.

Approach. Factor the cantilever loads to get Mf and Vf at A, convert the moment into a flange couple, size the flange connection for that couple and the web connection for the shear, then check the column flange and web for the concentrated force.

  1. Factor the loads and take moments about A. Both point loads are occupancy loads, so $$V_f = 1.5\,(100 + 200) = \boxed{450\ \text{kN}}$$ and, with lever arms of 1.0 m and 3.0 m measured from the connection, $$M_f = 1.5\,\bigl(100 \times 1.0 + 200 \times 3.0\bigr) = 1.5 \times 700 = \boxed{1050\ \text{kN}\cdot\text{m}}$$
  2. Check what the beam itself can deliver. Before detailing a joint it is worth asking whether the member can reach these actions. The W530×92 is Class 1 and, taken as laterally supported, $$M_r = \phi Z_x F_y = 0.90 \times 2360\times10^{3} \times 350 = 743\ \text{kN}\cdot\text{m}$$ against Mf = 1050 kN·m — a utilisation of 1.41. Its web is ample in shear, Vr = φ(d w)(0.66Fy) = 1130 kN. So the section is adequate for shear but overstressed in flexure by 41 %. The question nevertheless asks for a connection sized for the required actions, and that is what is designed below; the member finding is recorded as an assumption under NOTE 1.
  3. Resolve the moment into a flange couple. In a directly welded moment connection the flanges carry the moment and the web carries the shear. Taking the couple arm as the centre-to-centre flange distance, $$T_f = C_f = \frac{M_f}{d - t} = \frac{1050 \times 10^{6}}{533 - 15.6} = \boxed{2029\ \text{kN}}$$
  4. Test whether the bare flange can carry it. Even a complete-joint-penetration groove weld can only develop the flange it joins: $$T_r = \phi\,(b\,t)\,F_y = 0.90 \times (209 \times 15.6) \times 350 = 1027\ \text{kN}$$ which is barely half of Tf. Welding the beam flanges directly to the column therefore cannot work, and flange plates that add cross-sectional area are required.
  5. Size the flange plates. Try a 250 × 30 mm plate of the same grade, one on top of the top flange and one under the bottom flange: $$T_r = 0.90 \times (250 \times 30) \times 350 = 2363\ \text{kN} \;>\; 2029\ \text{kN}$$ a utilisation of 0.86. The 250 mm width overhangs the 209 mm flange by 20 mm each side, which gives clear access for the longitudinal fillet welds.
  6. Weld the plate to the column flange. This joint is loaded in direct tension (or compression) normal to the column face, so a complete-joint-penetration groove weld with matching E49xx electrode is used. A CJP weld made with matching electrode develops the full plate, so its resistance equals the 2363 kN just computed and no separate weld calculation is needed.
  7. Weld the plate to the beam flange. These fillet welds run parallel to the force (θ = 0), so the S16 Clause 13.13.2.2 directional factor is unity: $$V_r = 0.67\,\phi_w A_w X_u = 0.67 \times 0.67 \times (0.707 \times 12) \times 490 = 1866\ \text{N/mm}$$ for a 12 mm leg. The total length required is $$L = \frac{2029 \times 10^{3}}{1866} = 1088\ \text{mm}$$ Splitting this between the two longitudinal lines gives 544 mm per side; adopt 12 mm fillets, 600 mm long each side, worth 2239 kN.
  8. Weld the web for shear. Over a 450 mm clear web length, two lines of fillet weld must each carry $$\frac{450 \times 10^{3}}{2 \times 450} = 500\ \text{N/mm}$$ which asks for only a 3.2 mm leg. The minimum fillet of S16 Table 24 is set by the thicker part joined — the 31.0 mm column flange — and is 8 mm. Use 8 mm fillets, 450 mm long, both sides of the web (1120 kN, against 450 kN demanded). The weld is oversized by the code minimum, not by choice.
  9. Check the column under the flange force. S16 Clause 14.3.2 governs the unstiffened column. For a bearing length equal to the plate thickness, web local yielding gives $$B_r = 0.80\,w\,(N + 10t)\,F_y = 0.80 \times 17.9 \times (30 + 310) \times 350 = 1704\ \text{kN}$$ and flange bending under the tension flange gives $$B_r = 0.80 \times 7t^{2} F_y = 0.80 \times 7 \times 31.0^{2} \times 350 = 1884\ \text{kN}$$ Both fall short of Tf = 2029 kN, so a pair of transverse stiffeners is mandatory at each flange level, fitted between the column flanges and welded to the web and to the loaded flange.

The finished detail is therefore a flange-plated moment connection: 250 × 30 mm plates CJP-welded to the column flange and fillet-welded back along the beam flanges, an 8 mm double-fillet web connection for shear, and transverse column stiffeners opposite both beam flanges.

QuantityValue
Factored shear at A, Vf450 kN
Factored moment at A, Mf1050 kN·m
Flange couple force, Tf = Cf2029 kN
Flange plates250 × 30 mm, 350W (Tr = 2363 kN, util. 0.86)
Plate to column flangeCJP groove weld, E49xx matching electrode
Plate to beam flange12 mm fillet, 600 mm each side (Vr = 2239 kN)
Web to column flange8 mm fillet, 450 mm each side (Vr = 1120 kN)
Column stiffenersRequired — Br = 1704 kN (web) and 1884 kN (flange) < 2029 kN
Beam adequacyMr = 743 kN·m < 1050 kN·m — section inadequate (see callout)

Check — the given beam is too light for the given loads. The W530×92 reaches only 743 kN·m against the 1050 kN·m the loads produce. The connection above is sized for the required actions as the question asks, but on a real project the beam would be upgraded first — a deeper section of the W610 or W690 series is needed to reach 1050 kN·m, and its greater depth would also reduce the flange couple and shorten the flange-plate welds. NOTE 1 on page 1 explicitly invites this kind of statement.

← Paper overview