Question 2 of 6: Phase Relations for a Compacted Sample
Nivaar worked solution (AI-drafted; not reviewed by a licensed engineer)
Notes on this paper
EGBC / Engineers Canada National Examination — Structural Engineering (legacy), 07-Str-A3 Geotechnical Materials and Analysis, December 2013. Three hours; closed book; one Casio or Sharp approved calculator; drawing instruments required; all required charts and equations are supplied at the back of the paper (Fadum influence chart, Newmark chart with $I_N = 0.005$, and a two-page formula sheet). Total value 100 marks over six compulsory questions (20 + 10 + 10 + 20 + 20 + 20). Every question and every sub-part is solved in full below.
Reference texts: Das, Principles of Geotechnical Engineering, 9th ed. (Ch. 3 weight–volume relationships, Ch. 6 compaction, Ch. 7 permeability, Ch. 8 seepage, Ch. 9 in-situ stresses, Ch. 10 stresses in a soil mass, Ch. 11 consolidation, Ch. 12 shear strength); Knappett & Craig, Craig’s Soil Mechanics, 8th ed. (Ch. 3 effective stress and artesian profiles, Ch. 5 shear strength and stress-path plots); Holtz, Kovacs & Sheahan, An Introduction to Geotechnical Engineering, 2nd ed. (compacted-fill fabric); Canadian Geotechnical Society, Canadian Foundation Engineering Manual (CFEM), 4th ed. — the governing Canadian practice document for settlement, excavation heave and factors of safety; ASTM D698 / D1557 (Proctor compaction), ASTM D7181 (consolidated-drained triaxial).
Check — two printing slips in the source, carried as stated. (a) The Question 1 header reads “(4 × 5 = 20 marks)” but five statements (i)–(v) are printed; the solution treats the question as 5 × 4 = 20 marks and answers all five. (b) Question 5 is valued at 20 marks while its printed sub-part marks are 5 + 7 + 7 = 19; the missing mark is assumed to sit with part (a), and all three parts are answered in full. Neither slip changes any calculation.
Question 2: Phase Relations for a Compacted Sample (10 marks)
Given. A single compacted specimen whose total mass, total volume, water content and specific gravity of solids are all known, from which the complete phase diagram can be reconstructed.
Given data
Quantity
Symbol
Value
Total mass of specimen
$m$
12.5 kg
Total volume
$V$
0.006 m3
Water (moisture) content
$w$
10 % = 0.10
Specific gravity of solids
$G_s$
2.67
Unit weight of water
$\gamma_w$
9.81 kN/m3
Find. The bulk unit weight $\gamma$, the dry unit weight $\gamma_d$, the degree of saturation $S$, the void ratio $e$ and the porosity $n$.
Approach. Get $\gamma$ from mass and volume, strip the water out with $\gamma_d = \gamma/(1+w)$, back-figure $e$ from the solid-phase identity $\gamma_d = G_s\gamma_w/(1+e)$, then read $n$ and $S$ off the standard relations $n = e/(1+e)$ and $Se = wG_s$.
Bulk density and bulk unit weight. The bulk (total, moist) unit weight is the weight of everything in the specimen divided by the volume it occupies:
$$\rho = \frac{m}{V} = \frac{12.5}{0.006} = 2083.3\ \text{kg/m}^3
\qquad
\gamma = \rho\,g = 2083.3 \times 9.81 = \boxed{20.44\ \text{kN/m}^3}$$
This is the unit weight that would be used directly in an overburden calculation above the water table.
Dry unit weight. Water content is defined on the mass of solids, $w = m_w/m_s$, so the solids alone carry the fraction $1/(1+w)$ of the total weight while occupying the same total volume:
$$\gamma_d = \frac{\gamma}{1+w} = \frac{20.44}{1.10} = \boxed{18.58\ \text{kN/m}^3}$$
This is the value a field density test is compared against in a compaction specification.
Void ratio from the solid phase. Writing the dry unit weight in terms of the solid phase, $\gamma_d = W_s/V = G_s\gamma_w V_s / (V_s + V_v)$, which rearranges to the formula-sheet relation $\gamma_d = G_s\gamma_w/(1+e)$. Solving for the void ratio,
$$e = \frac{G_s\gamma_w}{\gamma_d} - 1 = \frac{2.67 \times 9.81}{18.58} - 1 = \frac{26.19}{18.58} - 1 = \boxed{0.410}$$
A void ratio of 0.41 is a well-compacted granular or sandy fill; a loose sand would be nearer 0.7 and a soft clay above 1.0.
Porosity. Porosity and void ratio measure the same voids against different denominators — $e$ against the solids, $n$ against the total:
$$n = \frac{e}{1+e} = \frac{0.410}{1.410} = 0.291 = \boxed{29.1\ \%}$$
Degree of saturation. The identity $Se = wG_s$ on the formula sheet follows directly from the definitions of $S$, $e$, $w$ and $G_s$, so
$$S = \frac{wG_s}{e} = \frac{0.10 \times 2.67}{0.410} = 0.652 = \boxed{65.2\ \%}$$
The specimen is well short of saturation, which is exactly what a soil compacted dry of optimum looks like — consistent with the fabric discussion in Question 3.
Cross-check by rebuilding the phase diagram. As an independent verification, work forward from masses instead of backward from unit weights. Mass of solids $m_s = 12.5/1.10 = 11.364$ kg, so $V_s = 11.364/(2.67 \times 1000) = 0.004256\ \text{m}^3$ and $V_v = 0.006 - 0.004256 = 0.001744\ \text{m}^3$. Then $e = V_v/V_s = 0.410$ and $n = V_v/V = 0.291$, both reproducing the values above. The mass of water is $m_w = 12.5 - 11.364 = 1.136$ kg, giving $V_w = 0.001136\ \text{m}^3$ and $S = V_w/V_v = 0.652$. Every route agrees.