Question 5 of 9: Slope-deflection analysis of a frame with a fabrication error
Nivaar worked solution (AI-drafted; not reviewed by a licensed engineer)
Notes on this paper
Paper format. 07-Str-A4 Advanced Structural
Analysis, National Examinations, May 2013 — 3 hours, closed book (an approved
Sharp or Casio calculator is permitted). Nine questions are printed. The candidate must
answer Question 1 and Question 2, then two of Questions 3–5 and
two of Questions 6–9 — six questions constitute a complete paper
(8 + 12 + 2 × 16 + 2 × 24 =
100 marks). Marks are shown in the left margin of the paper.
All nine questions are solved below, because the set is intended as a study
resource rather than as a three-hour sitting.
Reference texts.
R. C. Hibbeler, Structural Analysis, 10th ed. — influence lines
(Ch. 6, 8), energy methods and Castigliano's theorems (Ch. 9), the force
(flexibility) method (Ch. 10), slope-deflection (Ch. 11) and moment distribution
(Ch. 12).
A. Kassimali, Structural Analysis, 6th ed. — Ch. 13 slope-deflection
including support settlement and sidesway; Ch. 8 influence lines for trusses.
A. Ghali, A. M. Neville and T. G. Brown, Structural Analysis: A Unified
Classical and Matrix Approach, 7th ed. — Ch. 3–5 force and displacement
methods, lack of fit and prescribed displacements.
J. C. McCormac and S. F. Csernak, Structural Analysis Using Classical and
Matrix Methods, 4th ed. — kinematic indeterminacy and the use of symmetry.
Sign conventions used throughout. Slope-deflection end moments
$M_{ij}$ are the moments the joint applies to the member, clockwise positive;
joint rotations $\theta$ are clockwise positive; the chord rotation
$\psi_{ij}=\Delta/L$ is positive when the member chord rotates clockwise. Bending moment
diagrams are plotted with sagging positive, so that the sagging moment at
end $i$ of member $ij$ is $+M_{ij}$ and at end $j$ it is $-M_{ji}$. All members are
inextensible unless stated otherwise, so axial deformation contributes nothing to the
compatibility equations.
Question 5: Slope-deflection analysis of a frame with a fabrication error (16 marks)
6 m high; 1–5 and 4–8 pin-ended at both ends,
2–6 and 3–7 built in at the base and rigidly framed into the beam
Fabrication error
columns 1–5 and 4–8 are 0.048 m too long,
forced into place
Flexural rigidity
$EI = 5.0\times10^{4}\ \text{kN}\cdot\text{m}^{2}$
throughout
Applied loading
none
Find. The member end moments, and the shear and bending moment diagrams
with their maximum and minimum ordinates.
Q5 — the frame and its bending moment diagram. The two outer columns are pin-ended, so they carry no moment and act purely as struts that jack the beam ends up by 0.048 m.
Approach. Convert the fabrication error into a prescribed vertical
displacement of joints 1 and 4, treat the beam as a continuous member with
rotational springs supplied by the two inner columns, exploit the symmetry of both structure
and imposed displacement, and solve two slope-deflection equations.
Turn the lack of fit into a support movement. Columns 1–5 and
4–8 are pinned at both ends, so they are two-force members carrying pure axial force
and delivering no moment to the beam — hence $M_{12}=M_{43}=0$. They
are also inextensible, so once forced into place their tops necessarily stand $0.048\text{ m}$
above the design level:
$$v_1=v_4=+0.048\ \text{m},\qquad v_2=v_3=0 ,$$
the inner columns being inextensible and built in at the base. There is no sidesway, because
the imposed displacement is symmetric and the two inner columns restrain horizontal movement
symmetrically.
Compute the chord rotations. For a horizontal member $i\to j$ the chord
rotation is $\psi_{ij}=(v_i-v_j)/L$, clockwise positive:
$$\psi_{12}=\frac{0.048-0}{6}=+0.008,\qquad \psi_{23}=0,\qquad
\psi_{34}=\frac{0-0.048}{6}=-0.008 .$$
Exploit symmetry. Both the structure and the imposed displacement are
symmetric about the mid-point of span 2–3, so
$\theta_3=-\theta_2$ and $\theta_4=-\theta_1$, and only two rotations remain.
Write the slope-deflection equations. With
$k_1=2EI/6=1.6667\times10^{4}$, $k_2=2EI/4=2.500\times10^{4}$ and the inner columns
contributing the rotational stiffness $4EI/6=3.3333\times10^{4}$,
$$M_{12}=k_1\!\left(2\theta_1+\theta_2-3\psi_{12}\right)=0 ,$$
$$M_{21}=k_1\!\left(2\theta_2+\theta_1-3\psi_{12}\right),\qquad
M_{23}=k_2\!\left(2\theta_2+\theta_3\right)=k_2\theta_2 ,$$
and joint 2 requires $M_{21}+M_{23}+\dfrac{4EI}{6}\theta_2=0$.
Solve the two equations. The first gives
$\theta_1=\tfrac12\!\left(3\psi_{12}-\theta_2\right)=0.012-0.5\theta_2$. Substituting into
the joint equation,
$$1.5k_1\theta_2+\left(k_2+\tfrac{4EI}{6}\right)\theta_2 = 1.5k_1\frac{0.048}{6},$$
$$\boxed{\theta_2 = +0.00240\ \text{rad},\qquad \theta_1 = +0.01080\ \text{rad}}$$
(clockwise positive; by symmetry $\theta_3=-0.00240$ and $\theta_4=-0.01080$).
Back-substitute for the end moments.
$$M_{21}=k_1\!\left(0.00480+0.01080-0.02400\right)=-140.0\ \text{kN}\cdot\text{m},\qquad
M_{23}=k_2(0.00240)=+60.0\ \text{kN}\cdot\text{m},$$
$$M_{26}=\frac{2EI}{6}(2\theta_2)=+80.0\ \text{kN}\cdot\text{m},\qquad
M_{62}=\frac{2EI}{6}\theta_2=+40.0\ \text{kN}\cdot\text{m} .$$
Joint 2 checks: $-140.0+60.0+80.0=0$. The mirror joint carries the same magnitudes with
reversed signs, and $M_{12}=M_{43}=0$ as required by the pinned columns.
Convert to diagram ordinates. In the sagging-positive convention the
bending moment at end $i$ of member $ij$ is $+M_{ij}$ and at end $j$ it is $-M_{ji}$, so the
beam moment runs from zero at joint 1 to $+140.0\ \text{kN}\cdot\text{m}$ just left of
joint 2, drops by the column moment of $80.0\ \text{kN}\cdot\text{m}$ to a constant
$+60.0\ \text{kN}\cdot\text{m}$ across the middle span, and mirrors on the right. Each inner
column runs from $-40.0\ \text{kN}\cdot\text{m}$ at its base to
$+80.0\ \text{kN}\cdot\text{m}$ at its head.
Shears and axial forces. Span 1–2 carries no load, so its shear is
constant:
$$V_{12}=\frac{M_{12}+M_{21}}{-6}=+23.33\ \text{kN},$$
and span 2–3 carries zero shear (its two end moments are equal and opposite), which is
why its moment is constant. Each inner column carries the horizontal shear
$$H=\frac{M_{26}+M_{62}}{6}=\frac{80.0+40.0}{6}=20.0\ \text{kN},$$
the two acting in opposite directions and balanced through the axial force in the beam. The
outer columns are therefore in compression at 23.33 kN (they jack the beam
up) and the inner columns are in tension at 23.33 kN (they hold it down);
the four axial forces sum to zero, as they must with no applied load.
Check: the interpretation of “forced into place”. Because
every member is declared inextensible, the only kinematically admissible reading is that the
0.048 m lack of fit is absorbed entirely by lifting the beam ends, not by shortening
the columns. If the columns were treated as axially flexible the beam-end rise would be
smaller and every moment above would reduce in proportion; the stated inextensibility rules
that out.
Final results — Question 5
Quantity
Value
Joint rotations (clockwise positive)
$\theta_1=+0.01080$,
$\theta_2=+0.00240$, $\theta_3=-0.00240$, $\theta_4=-0.01080$ rad