NivaarExam PrepOfficial exam papers ↗

07-Str-A4 · May 2013

Question 5 of 9: Slope-deflection analysis of a frame with a fabrication error

Nivaar worked solution (AI-drafted; not reviewed by a licensed engineer)

Notes on this paper

Paper format. 07-Str-A4 Advanced Structural Analysis, National Examinations, May 2013 — 3 hours, closed book (an approved Sharp or Casio calculator is permitted). Nine questions are printed. The candidate must answer Question 1 and Question 2, then two of Questions 3–5 and two of Questions 6–9 — six questions constitute a complete paper (8 + 12 + 2 × 16 + 2 × 24 = 100 marks). Marks are shown in the left margin of the paper. All nine questions are solved below, because the set is intended as a study resource rather than as a three-hour sitting.

Reference texts.

Sign conventions used throughout. Slope-deflection end moments $M_{ij}$ are the moments the joint applies to the member, clockwise positive; joint rotations $\theta$ are clockwise positive; the chord rotation $\psi_{ij}=\Delta/L$ is positive when the member chord rotates clockwise. Bending moment diagrams are plotted with sagging positive, so that the sagging moment at end $i$ of member $ij$ is $+M_{ij}$ and at end $j$ it is $-M_{ji}$. All members are inextensible unless stated otherwise, so axial deformation contributes nothing to the compatibility equations.

Question 5: Slope-deflection analysis of a frame with a fabrication error (16 marks)

Question text not reproduced: the examination questions are © Engineers and Geoscientists BC. Open the official past paper (linked at the top of this page) to read the question, then follow the worked solution below.

Given.

Given data
Beam 1–2–3–4spans 6 m, 4 m, 6 m (16 m overall)
Columns6 m high; 1–5 and 4–8 pin-ended at both ends, 2–6 and 3–7 built in at the base and rigidly framed into the beam
Fabrication errorcolumns 1–5 and 4–8 are 0.048 m too long, forced into place
Flexural rigidity$EI = 5.0\times10^{4}\ \text{kN}\cdot\text{m}^{2}$ throughout
Applied loadingnone

Find. The member end moments, and the shear and bending moment diagrams with their maximum and minimum ordinates.

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 6 m 4 m 6 m 6 m 140 60 140 80 40 BMD (kN·m); sagging plotted above the member axis
Q5 — the frame and its bending moment diagram. The two outer columns are pin-ended, so they carry no moment and act purely as struts that jack the beam ends up by 0.048 m.

Approach. Convert the fabrication error into a prescribed vertical displacement of joints 1 and 4, treat the beam as a continuous member with rotational springs supplied by the two inner columns, exploit the symmetry of both structure and imposed displacement, and solve two slope-deflection equations.

  1. Turn the lack of fit into a support movement. Columns 1–5 and 4–8 are pinned at both ends, so they are two-force members carrying pure axial force and delivering no moment to the beam — hence $M_{12}=M_{43}=0$. They are also inextensible, so once forced into place their tops necessarily stand $0.048\text{ m}$ above the design level: $$v_1=v_4=+0.048\ \text{m},\qquad v_2=v_3=0 ,$$ the inner columns being inextensible and built in at the base. There is no sidesway, because the imposed displacement is symmetric and the two inner columns restrain horizontal movement symmetrically.
  2. Compute the chord rotations. For a horizontal member $i\to j$ the chord rotation is $\psi_{ij}=(v_i-v_j)/L$, clockwise positive: $$\psi_{12}=\frac{0.048-0}{6}=+0.008,\qquad \psi_{23}=0,\qquad \psi_{34}=\frac{0-0.048}{6}=-0.008 .$$
  3. Exploit symmetry. Both the structure and the imposed displacement are symmetric about the mid-point of span 2–3, so $\theta_3=-\theta_2$ and $\theta_4=-\theta_1$, and only two rotations remain.
  4. Write the slope-deflection equations. With $k_1=2EI/6=1.6667\times10^{4}$, $k_2=2EI/4=2.500\times10^{4}$ and the inner columns contributing the rotational stiffness $4EI/6=3.3333\times10^{4}$, $$M_{12}=k_1\!\left(2\theta_1+\theta_2-3\psi_{12}\right)=0 ,$$ $$M_{21}=k_1\!\left(2\theta_2+\theta_1-3\psi_{12}\right),\qquad M_{23}=k_2\!\left(2\theta_2+\theta_3\right)=k_2\theta_2 ,$$ and joint 2 requires $M_{21}+M_{23}+\dfrac{4EI}{6}\theta_2=0$.
  5. Solve the two equations. The first gives $\theta_1=\tfrac12\!\left(3\psi_{12}-\theta_2\right)=0.012-0.5\theta_2$. Substituting into the joint equation, $$1.5k_1\theta_2+\left(k_2+\tfrac{4EI}{6}\right)\theta_2 = 1.5k_1\frac{0.048}{6},$$ $$\boxed{\theta_2 = +0.00240\ \text{rad},\qquad \theta_1 = +0.01080\ \text{rad}}$$ (clockwise positive; by symmetry $\theta_3=-0.00240$ and $\theta_4=-0.01080$).
  6. Back-substitute for the end moments. $$M_{21}=k_1\!\left(0.00480+0.01080-0.02400\right)=-140.0\ \text{kN}\cdot\text{m},\qquad M_{23}=k_2(0.00240)=+60.0\ \text{kN}\cdot\text{m},$$ $$M_{26}=\frac{2EI}{6}(2\theta_2)=+80.0\ \text{kN}\cdot\text{m},\qquad M_{62}=\frac{2EI}{6}\theta_2=+40.0\ \text{kN}\cdot\text{m} .$$ Joint 2 checks: $-140.0+60.0+80.0=0$. The mirror joint carries the same magnitudes with reversed signs, and $M_{12}=M_{43}=0$ as required by the pinned columns.
  7. Convert to diagram ordinates. In the sagging-positive convention the bending moment at end $i$ of member $ij$ is $+M_{ij}$ and at end $j$ it is $-M_{ji}$, so the beam moment runs from zero at joint 1 to $+140.0\ \text{kN}\cdot\text{m}$ just left of joint 2, drops by the column moment of $80.0\ \text{kN}\cdot\text{m}$ to a constant $+60.0\ \text{kN}\cdot\text{m}$ across the middle span, and mirrors on the right. Each inner column runs from $-40.0\ \text{kN}\cdot\text{m}$ at its base to $+80.0\ \text{kN}\cdot\text{m}$ at its head.
  8. Shears and axial forces. Span 1–2 carries no load, so its shear is constant: $$V_{12}=\frac{M_{12}+M_{21}}{-6}=+23.33\ \text{kN},$$ and span 2–3 carries zero shear (its two end moments are equal and opposite), which is why its moment is constant. Each inner column carries the horizontal shear $$H=\frac{M_{26}+M_{62}}{6}=\frac{80.0+40.0}{6}=20.0\ \text{kN},$$ the two acting in opposite directions and balanced through the axial force in the beam. The outer columns are therefore in compression at 23.33 kN (they jack the beam up) and the inner columns are in tension at 23.33 kN (they hold it down); the four axial forces sum to zero, as they must with no applied load.

Check: the interpretation of “forced into place”. Because every member is declared inextensible, the only kinematically admissible reading is that the 0.048 m lack of fit is absorbed entirely by lifting the beam ends, not by shortening the columns. If the columns were treated as axially flexible the beam-end rise would be smaller and every moment above would reduce in proportion; the stated inextensibility rules that out.

Final results — Question 5
QuantityValue
Joint rotations (clockwise positive)$\theta_1=+0.01080$, $\theta_2=+0.00240$, $\theta_3=-0.00240$, $\theta_4=-0.01080$ rad
Bending moment at joints 1 and 40 (pin-ended columns)
Maximum beam moment140.0 kN·m sagging, just inside joints 2 and 3
Moment in the middle span 2–360.0 kN·m sagging, constant
Inner column moments80.0 kN·m at the head, 40.0 kN·m at the base
Beam shear, outer spans±23.33 kN (constant); zero in span 2–3
Inner column shear20.0 kN
Column axial forces23.33 kN compression (outer), 23.33 kN tension (inner)