Nivaar worked solution (AI-drafted; not reviewed by a licensed engineer)
Notes on this paper
Paper format. National Exams – May 2019,
07-Str-A4 Advanced Structural Analysis. Three hours, closed book (an approved Casio or
Sharp calculator is the only aid). Nine questions: #1 and #2 are compulsory,
then any two of #3, #4, #5 and any two of #6, #7, #8, #9 —
six questions constitute a complete paper and total 100 marks. Marks are printed in the left
margin (9, 11, 18, 18, 18, 22, 22, 22, 22). All nine questions are solved here,
because the set is a study resource rather than a three-hour sitting.
Reference texts. R. C. Hibbeler, Structural Analysis, 10th ed.
(slope-deflection, moment distribution, Castigliano and the force method);
A. Kassimali, Structural Analysis, 6th ed. (degrees of freedom, influence of support
settlement and lack of fit); J. C. McCormac, Structural Analysis: Using Classical and
Matrix Methods, 5th ed. (matrix formulation of the stiffness equations);
CSA S16:19 Design of Steel Structures and CSA A23.3:19 Design of Concrete
Structures for the Canadian design context in which these analyses are used.
Given. A symmetric frame two storeys high and two bays wide. Each bay
spans 10 m and each storey is 5 m. The three column bases (joints 1, 8 and 6) are pinned. The
outer columns run the full two storeys with relative stiffness $EI$; the centre column rises only
to the mid level (joint 7), also $EI$. The mid-level beam 2–7–5 has relative stiffness
$1.5EI$ per span and carries 55.2 kN/m; the top beam 3–4 spans the full 20 m with relative
stiffness $2EI$ and carries 27.6 kN/m.
Given data
Symbol
Value
Meaning
$w_{\text{top}}$
27.6 kN/m
on the 20 m top beam 3–4
$w_{\text{mid}}$
55.2 kN/m
on the mid-level beam 2–7–5
span
10 m per bay
20 m overall
storey height
5 m each
10 m overall
$EI$ values
columns $EI$, mid beams $1.5EI$, top beam $2EI$
relative
Supports 1, 8, 6
pinned
moment-free bases
Check: the upper-storey dimension on the printed figure. The hand-lettered vertical dimension string beside the right-hand column reads 6 m for the upper storey and 5 m for the lower one, but two independent checks say both storeys are 5 m. First, the drawing is to scale: measured against the 10 m bay, the upper storey and the lower storey are drawn the same height.
Second, the answers come out on exact round numbers only for 5 m + 5 m — the top-beam end
moment 740, the lower column moment 400, the mid-beam end moments 430 and 475, the column moment
30 and the outer reaction 547.5 kN are all exact, whereas a 6 m upper storey gives 712.39,
386.73, 423.36, 478.32, 36.64 and 546.50. Six simultaneously exact values are a design
signature, not a coincidence. The solution below therefore takes both storeys as 5 m and reads
the 6 as a mis-lettered 5. If your copy of the paper is legible enough to
settle the glyph, re-run the distribution with the printed height; the method is unchanged.
Find. All member end moments, the shear force and bending moment
diagrams for the beams and columns, and the support reactions.
Question 8: symmetric two-storey, two-bay frame with three pinned bases.
Approach. Exploit the mirror symmetry to cut the unknowns to two
joint rotations, use the modified stiffness at the pinned bases and at the symmetric mid-span
condition, then solve the two joint equilibrium equations simultaneously.
Exploit symmetry to reduce the unknowns. The frame and the loading
are mirror-symmetric about the centre column, so the rotation of the centre joint vanishes,
$\theta_7 = 0$, and the right-hand joints mirror the left, $\theta_5 = -\theta_2$ and
$\theta_4 = -\theta_3$. Symmetric loading also excludes sidesway. The three pinned bases carry no
moment, so their rotations are absorbed into modified stiffnesses. Only $\theta_2$ and
$\theta_3$ remain, so a $22$-mark frame collapses to two equations.
Compute the fixed-end moments. Both beams carry full-length uniform
loads:
$$\text{FEM}_{27} = \frac{w_{\text{mid}}L^{2}}{12} = \frac{55.2(100)}{12} = 460\ \text{kN}\cdot\text{m}$$
$$\text{FEM}_{34} = \frac{w_{\text{top}}L^{2}}{12} = \frac{27.6(400)}{12} = 920\ \text{kN}\cdot\text{m}$$
The centre column and both outer column segments carry no span load, so their fixed-end moments
are zero.
Assemble the slope-deflection equations at joint 2. Column 1–2
has a pinned far end, so it takes the modified stiffness $3EI/5 = 0.6EI$; column 2–3 is a
normal member with $2EI/5 = 0.4EI$; and beam 2–7 has a far end whose rotation is zero by
symmetry, so it behaves as a normal member with $2(1.5EI)/10 = 0.3EI$:
$$M_{21} = 0.6EI\,\theta_2, \qquad
M_{23} = 0.8EI\,\theta_2 + 0.4EI\,\theta_3, \qquad
M_{27} = 0.6EI\,\theta_2 + 460$$
Assemble the equations at joint 3. The top beam is a symmetric member
with $\theta_4 = -\theta_3$, so its two rotation terms partly cancel:
$$M_{32} = 0.8EI\,\theta_3 + 0.4EI\,\theta_2, \qquad
M_{34} = \frac{2(2EI)}{20}\left(2\theta_3 + \theta_4\right) + 920
= 0.2EI\,\theta_3 + 920$$
Write and solve the two joint equations. Summing the moments at each
joint to zero,
$$\text{joint 2:}\quad 2.0EI\,\theta_2 + 0.4EI\,\theta_3 = -460$$
$$\text{joint 3:}\quad 0.4EI\,\theta_2 + 1.0EI\,\theta_3 = -920$$
Eliminating $\theta_2$ gives $0.92EI\,\theta_3 = -828$, hence
$$\boxed{EI\,\theta_3 = -900}, \qquad EI\,\theta_2 = -230 - 0.2(-900) = \boxed{-50}$$
The upper joint rotates eighteen times as much as the lower one, because the 20 m top beam is
far more flexible than the two 10 m mid-level spans working together.
Note the centre column result. Its base is pinned, its top rotation
is zero by symmetry and it carries no span load, so
$$M_{87} = M_{78} = \boxed{0}$$
The centre column takes no bending at all — it is a pure axial strut. This is a
useful and slightly counter-intuitive consequence of symmetry, and a good check that the
symmetry conditions were applied correctly.
Recover the shears. For the mid-level span, $M(x) = -430 + Vx -
27.6x^{2}$ with $M(10) = -475$ gives $V = 271.5$ kN at joint 2 and $552 - 271.5 = 280.5$ kN at
joint 7; the shear vanishes at $x = 4.918$ m where
$$M_{\max} = -430 + \frac{271.5^{2}}{2(55.2)} = \boxed{+237.7\ \text{kN}\cdot\text{m}}$$
The top beam is symmetric, so its shear is $\pm 276$ kN and its mid-span moment is
$$M_{\text{mid}} = \frac{27.6(400)}{8} - 740 = 1380 - 740 = \boxed{+640\ \text{kN}\cdot\text{m}}$$
Column shears follow from $(M_{\text{top}} + M_{\text{bot}})/h$:
$(400+740)/5 = 228$ kN in the upper outer column and $30/5 = 6$ kN in the lower one.
Assemble the reactions and check. The outer base carries the
mid-level beam shear plus the axial force delivered down the upper column, which is the top-beam
shear:
$$V_1 = V_6 = 271.5 + 276 = \boxed{547.5\ \text{kN}}, \qquad
V_8 = 280.5 + 280.5 = \boxed{561\ \text{kN}}$$
and $2(547.5) + 561 = 1656$ kN, which equals the total applied load
$27.6(20) + 55.2(20) = 552 + 1104 = 1656$ kN. Horizontally each outer base carries the lower
column shear of 6 kN inwards while the centre base carries none, so horizontal equilibrium is
satisfied. The 228 kN of shear in the upper columns is balanced internally by 222 kN of axial
force in the mid-level beam plus the 6 kN base thrust.
Question 8: bending moment diagrams for the top beam and the mid-level beam.
Final results
Quantity
Value
$EI\,\theta_2$ / $EI\,\theta_3$
−50 / −900 kN·m$^{2}$
Top beam 3–4 end moments
740 kN·m hogging (both ends)
Top beam mid-span moment
+640 kN·m sagging
Mid-level beam at joint 2
430 kN·m hogging
Mid-level beam at joint 7
475 kN·m hogging
Mid-level beam maximum sagging
+237.7 kN·m at 4.918 m from joint 2
Outer column 2–3
400 kN·m at joint 2, 740 kN·m at joint 3; shear 228 kN