NivaarExam PrepOfficial exam papers ↗

07-Str-A5 · May 2013

Question 4 of 7: Unshored composite floor beam for a heavily loaded warehouse

Nivaar worked solution (AI-drafted; not reviewed by a licensed engineer)

Notes on this paper

Paper format. 07-Str-A5 Advanced Structural Design, National Examinations, May 2013 — three hours, "closed book" with handbooks and textbooks permitted and one approved Casio or Sharp calculator. Seven questions are printed; any five constitute a complete paper and all questions are of equal value (20 marks each, split 12 + 6 + 2 or 12 + 8 or 14 + 6 or 15 + 5 as printed on page 1). All seven questions are solved here, because this set is a study resource rather than an examination script.

Design data printed on page 1 (used throughout). Design in SI. Concrete $f'_c=30$ MPa; structural steel $F_y=350$ MPa; rebar $f_y=400$ MPa. Prestressed concrete: $f_{ci}=35$ MPa at transfer, $f'_c=50$ MPa, $n=6$, $f_{pu}=1750$ MPa, $f_{py}=1450$ MPa, $f_{p,initial}=1200$ MPa, losses in prestress $=240$ MPa. All loads shown on the figures are unfactored.

Reference texts. CSA S16 Design of Steel Structures and the CISC Handbook of Steel Construction — plate girders (Cl. 14), plastic design (Cl. 8.6), beam-columns (Cl. 13.8), composite beams (Cl. 17) and connections (Cl. 21); CSA A23.3 Design of Concrete Structures — flexure, shear, columns (Cl. 10), footings (Cl. 15), joints (Cl. 21.7) and prestressed concrete (Cl. 18); NBCC for the load combinations; C. G. Salmon, J. E. Johnson & F. A. Malhas, Steel Structures: Design and Behavior; J. G. MacGregor & J. K. Wight, Reinforced Concrete: Mechanics and Design; T. Y. Lin & N. H. Burns, Design of Prestressed Concrete Structures; L. S. Beedle, Plastic Design of Steel Frames.

Check: load factors. The paper states only that "all loads shown are unfactored" and gives no dead/live split for the concentrated loads. Every question below therefore treats the printed concentrated loads as specified live load and factors them by $\alpha_L=1.5$ (NBCC principal load case $1.25D+1.5L$); self-weight, where it is significant (the plate girder, the concrete beam, the composite slab, the prestressed girder), is estimated from the trial section and factored at $1.25$. A candidate who assumed a different split would obtain proportionally different member sizes; the method is what is being examined.

Check: section properties. Rolled-shape properties (area, $I$, $S$, $Z$, $r$) are quoted from the CISC Handbook of Steel Construction, which candidates are permitted to bring into this examination. They are stated explicitly wherever they are used, so every subsequent line can be checked against them.

Question 4: Unshored composite floor beam for a heavily loaded warehouse (15 + 5 = 20 marks)

Question text not reproduced: the examination questions are © Engineers and Geoscientists BC. Open the official past paper (linked at the top of this page) to read the question, then follow the worked solution below.

Given. Simply supported composite beams at 2.5 m centres spanning 16.0 m; live load 18 kPa; unshored construction; 100% (full) interaction; $f'_c=30$ MPa, $F_y=350$ MPa. Assumed: a 120 mm solid normal-density slab (2.88 kPa), 0.5 kPa superimposed dead load for finishes and services, and 19 mm headed studs, $F_u=450$ MPa.

QuantityValue
Span / spacing16.0 m / 2.5 m
Slab (assumed)120 mm solid, $f'_c=30$ MPa, $E_c=4500\sqrt{30}=24\,650$ MPa
Dead load $w_D$$(2.88+0.5)(2.5)+1.73=10.18$ kN/m
Live load $w_L$$18(2.5)=45.0$ kN/m
Factored $w_f=1.25w_D+1.5w_L$80.2 kN/m
Effective slab width $b_{eff}$$\min(L/4,\ s)=\min(4000,\ 2500)=2500$ mm

Find. (a) A steel section that, acting compositely with the slab, resists the factored moment while the bare steel alone resists the wet-concrete stage; (b) the number and layout of the shear connectors that develop full interaction.

2 – 19 mm studs per rowb(eff) = 2500120W840 × 176Figure Q4 — composite section, 100% interaction (mm)
The composite cross-section: 120 mm slab over W840 × 176, effective width 2500 mm, two 19 mm studs per row.

Approach. Compute the factored moment; find the plastic neutral axis by comparing the concrete compressive resistance with the steel tensile resistance; take moments to obtain $M_{rc}$; check the unshored construction stage and the deflections; then divide the horizontal shear at the interface by the resistance of one stud.

(a) The cross-section

  1. Design actions. $$M_f=\frac{w_fL^{2}}{8}=\frac{80.2(16)^{2}}{8}=2567\ \text{kN}\cdot\text{m},\qquad V_f=\frac{w_fL}{2}=642\ \text{kN}$$
  2. Concrete compressive resistance. $$C_r=0.85\phi_cf'_cb_{eff}t=0.85(0.65)(30)(2500)(120)\times10^{-3}=4972\ \text{kN}$$
  3. Try W840 × 176. From the CISC Handbook: $A=22\,400$ mm$^2$, $d=835$ mm, $b_f=292$ mm, $t_f=18.8$ mm, $w=14.0$ mm, $I_x=2460\times10^{6}$ mm$^4$, $Z_x=6810\times10^{3}$ mm$^3$, mass 176 kg/m (1.73 kN/m). Its tensile resistance is $$T_r=\phi AF_y=0.9(22\,400)(350)\times10^{-3}=7056\ \text{kN}\ >\ C_r=4972\ \text{kN}$$ so the plastic neutral axis (PNA) falls inside the steel section, and part of the steel must act in compression.
  4. Locate the PNA. The steel compression force is half the surplus, $$C_s=\frac{T_r-C_r}{2}=\frac{7056-4972}{2}=1042\ \text{kN}$$ The top flange alone can supply $\phi b_ft_fF_y=1729$ kN, so the PNA lies in the top flange at $$y=\frac{C_s}{\phi b_fF_y}=\frac{1042\times10^{3}}{0.9(292)(350)}=11.3\ \text{mm}$$ below the top of the steel.
  5. Moment resistance. The three internal forces have zero resultant, so moments may be taken about the top of the steel section (levers downward positive; the slab centroid is 60 mm above it): $$M_{rc}=T_r\frac{d}{2}-2C_s\frac{y}{2}+C_r(60)$$ $$M_{rc}=7056(417.5)-2(1042)(5.67)+4972(60)=3.232\times10^{6}\ \text{kN}\cdot\text{mm}=\boxed{3232\ \text{kN}\cdot\text{m}}$$ $M_f/M_{rc}=2567/3232=0.79$ — adequate, with the margin that a warehouse floor deserves.
  6. Web shear. With $h/w=(835-2\times18.8)/14=57.0$, which lies between $439\sqrt{k_v/F_y}=54.2$ and $502\sqrt{k_v/F_y}=62.0$ for an unstiffened web ($k_v=5.34$), $$F_s=\frac{290\sqrt{F_yk_v}}{h/w}=220\ \text{MPa}\;\Rightarrow\;V_r=\phi hwF_s=0.9(797)(14)(220)\times10^{-3}=2212\ \text{kN}\ \gg\ 642\ \text{kN}$$
  7. The unshored construction stage. Before the slab cures, the bare steel carries the wet concrete and a nominal 0.5 kPa construction live load: $$w_{f,constr}=1.25\left[2.88(2.5)+1.73\right]+1.5\left[0.5(2.5)\right]=13.0\ \text{kN/m}\;\Rightarrow\;M_f=417\ \text{kN}\cdot\text{m}$$ against the bare-steel resistance $\phi Z_xF_y=0.9(6810\times10^{3})(350)=2145$ kN·m. The construction stage is not remotely critical — a useful confirmation, because unshored construction is exactly the case where it sometimes is.
  8. Deflections. Dead load deflects the bare steel: $$\Delta_D=\frac{5w_DL^{4}}{384EI_x}=\frac{5(8.93)(16\,000)^{4}}{384(200\,000)(2460\times10^{6})}=15.5\ \text{mm}$$ which is cambered out at the shop. Live load acts on the composite section; with $n=E/E_c=200\,000/24\,650=8.11$ the transformed slab is $2500/8.11=308$ mm wide, the elastic neutral axis lies 120 mm below the top of the steel, and $I_{tr}=5.685\times10^{9}$ mm$^4$, giving $$\Delta_L=\frac{5(45)(16\,000)^{4}}{384(200\,000)(5.685\times10^{9})}=33.8\ \text{mm}=\frac{L}{474}\ <\ \frac{L}{360}$$ Both limits are met.

(b) Shear connectors

  1. Resistance of one stud. For a 19 mm headed stud, $A_{sc}=284$ mm$^2$, $\phi_{sc}=0.80$, $F_u=450$ MPa: $$q_r=\min\left[0.5\phi_{sc}A_{sc}\sqrt{f'_cE_c},\ \phi_{sc}A_{sc}F_u\right]=\min\left[97.5,\ 102.1\right]=97.5\ \text{kN}$$ (the concrete-controlled value governs, as it usually does with normal-density 30 MPa concrete).
  2. Horizontal shear to be transferred. For full (100%) interaction the connectors between a support and the point of maximum moment must carry the smaller of the two slab/steel forces: $$V_h=\min\left(C_r,\ T_r\right)=\min(4972,\ 7056)=4972\ \text{kN}$$
  3. Number of connectors. $$n=\frac{V_h}{q_r}=\frac{4972}{97.5}=51.0\ \Rightarrow\ \boxed{51\ \text{studs per half span}}$$ Because the beam is symmetric and simply supported, both halves need the same number, so $$n_{total}=2(51)=\boxed{102\ \text{studs per beam}}$$
  4. Layout. Place them in pairs: 26 rows of two studs over each 8.0 m half span gives 52 per half (104 per beam) at a pitch of $$p=\frac{8000}{26}=308\ \text{mm}$$ This satisfies the minimum longitudinal spacing $6d=114$ mm, the minimum transverse spacing $4d=76$ mm (the pair is set at 140 mm gauge), and the maximum spacing $8t_{slab}=960$ mm. Stud height $\ge 4d=76$ mm and $\ge t+30$; use 100 mm studs, giving at least 20 mm of cover over the head. Uniform spacing is permissible because the section is compact and ductile studs redistribute the interface shear.
QuantityValue
Factored load / moment / shear80.2 kN/m; 2567 kN·m; 642 kN
Effective slab width2500 mm (120 mm thick)
Steel sectionW840 × 176
$C_r$ (slab) / $T_r$ (steel)4972 kN / 7056 kN — PNA in the top flange, 11.3 mm down
$M_{rc}$3232 kN·m ($M_f/M_{rc}=0.79$)
Construction stage (unshored)$M_f=417$ kN·m vs $\phi Z_xF_y=2145$ kN·m
Deflections15.5 mm dead (cambered) + 33.8 mm live = $L/474$
Stud resistance $q_r$ (19 mm)97.5 kN
Connectors51 per half span → 26 rows of 2 at 308 mm; 104 per beam