22-Agric-A6 Physical Properties of Biological Materials and Food Products · May 2015
Question 7 of 9: Particle Size Distribution — Spray-Dried Milk Droplets and Powder Screen Analysis
Nivaar worked solution (AI-drafted; not reviewed by a licensed engineer)
Notes on this paper
Paper format. 04-Agric-A6 Physical Properties of Biological Materials and
Food Products, National Exams May 2015 — a three-hour closed-book
exam (approved calculator permitted; one aid sheet, both sides). Nine questions are set and
candidates answer any five, each worth 20 marks, for a 100-mark paper. All nine are worked here
so the set is a complete study resource.
Reference texts. M.A. Rao, S.S.H. Rizvi, A.K. Datta and J. Ahmed,
Engineering Properties of Foods, 4th ed. (rheology of fluid and semisolid foods,
particle size, optical and dielectric properties); N.N. Mohsenin, Physical Properties of
Plant and Animal Materials, 2nd ed. (thermal and rheological properties of biological
materials, surface heat transfer coefficient measurement, stress relaxation); R.P. Singh and
D.R. Heldman, Introduction to Food Engineering, 5th ed. (freezing/thawing rates and
shape factors, unsteady-state heat transfer, screen analysis); J.F. Steffe, Rheological
Methods in Food Process Engineering, 2nd ed. (viscoelasticity, generalized Maxwell model,
time-dependent flow behaviour); R.L. Earle, Unit Operations in Food Processing, 2nd ed.
(specific surface and particle number from sieve/screen data).
Question 7: Particle Size Distribution — Spray-Dried Milk Droplets and Powder Screen Analysis (20 marks)
Part (a) — Given. Cumulative mass-percent undersize varies linearly
with droplet diameter Dp, from X = 0% at Dp = 50 µm to X = 100% at
Dp = 250 µm — i.e. the mass-fraction density is uniform,
dX/dDp = 1/(Dmax−Dmin), over [50, 250] µm.
Find. The mass mean diameter D̄mass =
∫DpdX and the mean volume-surface (Sauter) diameter Dvs = 1/∫(dX/Dp).
Approach. Integrate each definition directly over the uniform mass-density
distribution on [Dmin, Dmax].
Part (a) — mass mean diameter.
$$\overline{D}_{mass}=\int_{D_{min}}^{D_{max}} D_p\,\frac{dX}{dD_p}\,dD_p=\frac{1}{D_{max}-D_{min}}\int_{D_{min}}^{D_{max}} D_p\,dD_p=\frac{D_{max}^2-D_{min}^2}{2(D_{max}-D_{min})}$$
Substituting Dmin = 50 µm, Dmax = 250 µm:
$$\overline{D}_{mass}=\frac{250^2-50^2}{2(250-50)}=\frac{62500-2500}{400}=\boxed{150\ \mu\text{m}}$$
(the arithmetic mean of the two end points, as expected for a uniform mass-density
distribution).
Part (a) — mean volume-surface (Sauter) diameter.
$$D_{vs}=\frac{1}{\displaystyle\int_{D_{min}}^{D_{max}}\frac{1}{D_p}\frac{dX}{dD_p}dD_p}=\frac{D_{max}-D_{min}}{\ln(D_{max}/D_{min})}$$
Substituting the same limits:
$$D_{vs}=\frac{250-50}{\ln(250/50)}=\frac{200}{\ln 5}=\frac{200}{1.6094}=\boxed{124.3\ \mu\text{m}}$$
Part (b) — volume and surface shape factors. Earle's screen-analysis
formulae express a particle's volume as vp = bDp3 and its
surface area as sp = aDp2, where a and b are related through the
sphericity Φs (the ratio of the surface area of a sphere of equal volume to the
particle's own surface area) by a/b = 6/Φs:
$$b=\frac{a\,\Phi_s}{6}=\frac{2\times0.7}{6}=0.2333$$
Part (b) — specific surface, AW. Summing the surface area
contributed by every size fraction per unit mass, using each fraction's particle count
(∝ Xi/Dpi3) times its individual surface area
(aDpi2), collapses to
$$A_W=\frac{a}{\rho_p\,b}\sum\frac{X_i}{D_{pi}}$$
$$A_W=\frac{2}{(0.0018)(0.2333)}\times0.8749=\frac{2}{4.200\times10^{-4}}\times0.8749=4761.9\times0.8749$$
$$A_W=\boxed{4166\ \text{mm}^2/\text{g}}$$
Part (b) — specific number of particles, NW. Similarly,
summing the particle count contributed by every size fraction per unit mass gives
$$N_W=\frac{1}{\rho_p\,b}\sum\frac{X_i}{D_{pi}^3}$$
$$N_W=\frac{1}{4.200\times10^{-4}}\times4.676=2380.95\times4.676$$
$$N_W=\boxed{11{,}133\ \text{particles/g}}$$
Final Results
Quantity
Value
Mass mean droplet diameter, D̄mass
150 µm
Mean volume-surface (Sauter) diameter, Dvs
124.3 µm
Volume shape factor, b
0.2333
Specific surface, AW
4166 mm²/g
Specific particle number, NW
11,133 particles/g
Check: the question's phrase "material between 4 mesh and 200 mesh" is
taken as the working size range the screen analysis already isolates (the table's own finest
sieve is 100 mesh, with the −100-mesh material collected on the Pan) — the three
consolidated sums ΣXi/Dpi, ΣXi/Dpi3
and ΣXiDpi are given directly in the source and are used as printed,
so this reading does not affect the numeric result.