NivaarExam PrepOfficial exam papers ↗

22-Agric-A6 Physical Properties of Biological Materials and Food Products · May 2015

Question 9 of 9: Stress Relaxation Analysis by the Successive-Residual Method (3-Term Maxwell Model)

Nivaar worked solution (AI-drafted; not reviewed by a licensed engineer)

Notes on this paper

Paper format. 04-Agric-A6 Physical Properties of Biological Materials and Food Products, National Exams May 2015 — a three-hour closed-book exam (approved calculator permitted; one aid sheet, both sides). Nine questions are set and candidates answer any five, each worth 20 marks, for a 100-mark paper. All nine are worked here so the set is a complete study resource.

Reference texts. M.A. Rao, S.S.H. Rizvi, A.K. Datta and J. Ahmed, Engineering Properties of Foods, 4th ed. (rheology of fluid and semisolid foods, particle size, optical and dielectric properties); N.N. Mohsenin, Physical Properties of Plant and Animal Materials, 2nd ed. (thermal and rheological properties of biological materials, surface heat transfer coefficient measurement, stress relaxation); R.P. Singh and D.R. Heldman, Introduction to Food Engineering, 5th ed. (freezing/thawing rates and shape factors, unsteady-state heat transfer, screen analysis); J.F. Steffe, Rheological Methods in Food Process Engineering, 2nd ed. (viscoelasticity, generalized Maxwell model, time-dependent flow behaviour); R.L. Earle, Unit Operations in Food Processing, 2nd ed. (specific surface and particle number from sieve/screen data).

Question 9: Stress Relaxation Analysis by the Successive-Residual Method (3-Term Maxwell Model) (20 marks)

Question text not reproduced: the examination questions are © Engineers and Geoscientists BC. Open the official past paper (linked at the top of this page) to read the question, then follow the worked solution below.

Given. A food material is subjected to a stress-relaxation test — a step strain ε0 applied instantaneously at t = 0 and held constant, while the resulting stress σ(t) (equivalently the relaxation modulus E(t) = σ(t)/ε 0) is recorded as it decays with time — and the material's behaviour is to be represented by a generalized (3-element) Maxwell model, $$E(t)=E_1e^{-t/\lambda_1}+E_2e^{-t/\lambda_2}+E_3e^{-t/\lambda_3}$$ with $\lambda_1 < \lambda_2 < \lambda_3$, i.e. six unknown parameters (three moduli Ei, three relaxation times λi).

Find. A procedure to extract all six parameters from the single measured E(t) curve.

Approach. Exploit the fact that at sufficiently long times only the slowest-relaxing (largest λ) term still contributes measurably, and peel the terms off the data one at a time from slowest to fastest — the successive residual (or "peeling-off") method.

  1. Fit the longest-time tail. Plot ln E(t) against t. At large t, the two faster terms (λ1, λ2) have decayed to negligible size, so the curve becomes a straight line governed by the slowest term alone: ln E(t) ≈ ln E3 − t/λ3. A least-squares line through the last several points gives the slope (−1/λ3) and intercept (ln E3), hence E3 and λ3.
  2. Subtract the fitted term and repeat. Compute the first residual, $$R_1(t)=E(t)-E_3e^{-t/\lambda_3},$$ over the full data range. R1(t) is now governed, at its own longest remaining times, by the second-slowest term alone: ln R1(t) ≈ ln E2 − t/λ2. Fitting a straight line to the mid-time tail of R1 gives E2 and λ2.
  3. Subtract again for the fastest term. Compute the second residual, $$R_2(t)=R_1(t)-E_2e^{-t/\lambda_2}=E(t)-E_3e^{-t/\lambda_3}-E_2e^{-t/\lambda_2},$$ which over the short-time data is governed by the fastest term alone: ln R2(t) ≈ ln E1 − t/λ1. A line fit through the earliest points gives E1 and λ1, completing all six parameters.
  4. Check. Sum all three fitted terms and compare against the original E(t) data over its full range; a good 3-term fit leaves a residual that is small and structureless (noise-level) everywhere — a systematic remaining curvature indicates a fourth relaxation mode is needed and the model should be extended, not forced to fit with only three terms.
Check (illustrative, not exam data): the peeling procedure above was validated numerically on a synthetic 3-term relaxation curve with known input parameters E1=40, λ1=1 s; E2=15, λ2=10 s; E3=5, λ3=100 s (arbitrary consistent units).
Final Results — successive-residual extraction sequence
StepFitted fromRecovers
1Longest-time tail of ln E(t)E3, λ3 (slowest term)
2Mid-time tail of ln[E(t) − E3e−t/λ3]E2, λ2
3Short-time data of ln[R1(t) − E2e−t/λ2]E1, λ1 (fastest term)
Back to the paper →