22-Agric-A6 Physical Properties of Biological Materials and Food Products · May 2015
Question 9 of 9: Stress Relaxation Analysis by the Successive-Residual Method (3-Term Maxwell Model)
Nivaar worked solution (AI-drafted; not reviewed by a licensed engineer)
Notes on this paper
Paper format. 04-Agric-A6 Physical Properties of Biological Materials and
Food Products, National Exams May 2015 — a three-hour closed-book
exam (approved calculator permitted; one aid sheet, both sides). Nine questions are set and
candidates answer any five, each worth 20 marks, for a 100-mark paper. All nine are worked here
so the set is a complete study resource.
Reference texts. M.A. Rao, S.S.H. Rizvi, A.K. Datta and J. Ahmed,
Engineering Properties of Foods, 4th ed. (rheology of fluid and semisolid foods,
particle size, optical and dielectric properties); N.N. Mohsenin, Physical Properties of
Plant and Animal Materials, 2nd ed. (thermal and rheological properties of biological
materials, surface heat transfer coefficient measurement, stress relaxation); R.P. Singh and
D.R. Heldman, Introduction to Food Engineering, 5th ed. (freezing/thawing rates and
shape factors, unsteady-state heat transfer, screen analysis); J.F. Steffe, Rheological
Methods in Food Process Engineering, 2nd ed. (viscoelasticity, generalized Maxwell model,
time-dependent flow behaviour); R.L. Earle, Unit Operations in Food Processing, 2nd ed.
(specific surface and particle number from sieve/screen data).
Question 9: Stress Relaxation Analysis by the Successive-Residual Method (3-Term Maxwell Model) (20 marks)
Given. A food material is subjected to a stress-relaxation test — a
step strain ε0 applied instantaneously at t = 0 and held constant, while the
resulting stress σ(t) (equivalently the relaxation modulus E(t) = σ(t)/ε
0) is recorded as it decays with time — and the material's behaviour is to be
represented by a generalized (3-element) Maxwell model,
$$E(t)=E_1e^{-t/\lambda_1}+E_2e^{-t/\lambda_2}+E_3e^{-t/\lambda_3}$$
with $\lambda_1 < \lambda_2 < \lambda_3$, i.e. six unknown parameters (three moduli
Ei, three relaxation times λi).
Find. A procedure to extract all six parameters from the single measured
E(t) curve.
Approach. Exploit the fact that at sufficiently long times only the
slowest-relaxing (largest λ) term still contributes measurably, and peel the terms off the
data one at a time from slowest to fastest — the successive residual (or
"peeling-off") method.
Fit the longest-time tail. Plot ln E(t) against t. At large t, the two
faster terms (λ1, λ2) have decayed to negligible size, so the
curve becomes a straight line governed by the slowest term alone: ln E(t) ≈ ln E3
− t/λ3. A least-squares line through the last several points gives the
slope (−1/λ3) and intercept (ln E3), hence E3 and
λ3.
Subtract the fitted term and repeat. Compute the first residual,
$$R_1(t)=E(t)-E_3e^{-t/\lambda_3},$$
over the full data range. R1(t) is now governed, at its own longest
remaining times, by the second-slowest term alone: ln R1(t) ≈ ln E2
− t/λ2. Fitting a straight line to the mid-time tail of R1
gives E2 and λ2.
Subtract again for the fastest term. Compute the second residual,
$$R_2(t)=R_1(t)-E_2e^{-t/\lambda_2}=E(t)-E_3e^{-t/\lambda_3}-E_2e^{-t/\lambda_2},$$
which over the short-time data is governed by the fastest term alone: ln R2(t) ≈
ln E1 − t/λ1. A line fit through the earliest points gives
E1 and λ1, completing all six parameters.
Check. Sum all three fitted terms and compare against the original E(t)
data over its full range; a good 3-term fit leaves a residual that is small and structureless
(noise-level) everywhere — a systematic remaining curvature indicates a fourth relaxation
mode is needed and the model should be extended, not forced to fit with only three terms.
Check (illustrative, not exam data): the peeling procedure above was
validated numerically on a synthetic 3-term relaxation curve with known input parameters
E1=40, λ1=1 s; E2=15, λ2=10 s;
E3=5, λ3=100 s (arbitrary consistent units).
Final Results — successive-residual extraction sequence