22-Agric-A6 Physical Properties of Biological Materials and Food Products · May 2016
Question 3 of 9: Flow Behaviour Index and Consistency Coefficient from Narrow-Gap Viscometer Data
Nivaar worked solution (AI-drafted; not reviewed by a licensed engineer)
Notes on this paper
Paper format. 04-Agric-A6 Physical Properties of Biological Materials and
Food Products, National Exams May 2016 — a three-hour closed-book
exam (approved calculator permitted; one aid sheet, both sides). Nine questions are set and
candidates answer any five, each worth 20 marks, for a 100-mark paper. All nine are worked here
so the set is a complete study resource.
Reference texts. M.A. Rao, S.S.H. Rizvi, A.K. Datta and J. Ahmed,
Engineering Properties of Foods, 4th ed. (rheology of fluid and semisolid foods,
particle size, surface/interfacial properties); N.N. Mohsenin, Physical Properties of
Plant and Animal Materials, 2nd ed. (thermal properties, calorimetry, texture and
rheological testing); R.P. Singh and D.R. Heldman, Introduction to Food Engineering,
5th ed. (thermal-property measurement, freezing-point depression, particle size); J.F. Steffe,
Rheological Methods in Food Process Engineering, 2nd ed. (viscometry, viscoelasticity,
the Kelvin-Voigt model, time-dependent flow behaviour); R.L. Earle, Unit Operations in
Food Processing, 2nd ed. (particle-size averages, specific surface from sieve data).
Question 3: Flow Behaviour Index and Consistency Coefficient from Narrow-Gap Viscometer Data (20 marks)
Find. The flow behaviour (power-law) index \(n\) and the consistency
coefficient \(b\) (commonly written \(K\)) of the power-law model \(\tau = b\,\dot\gamma^{\,n}\).
Approach. Reduce every torque/speed pair to a shear stress and a shear rate
using the narrow-gap Couette approximation, then fit a straight line to \(\ln\tau\) versus
\(\ln\dot\gamma\): the slope is \(n\) and the antilog of the intercept is \(b\).
Check: with \(r_o/r_i = 1.5\), this viscometer's gap is wider than the
~10% radius-ratio limit usually quoted for the narrow-gap approximation to be exact. The
approximation below is nonetheless the intended (and standard textbook) solution route for
this style of problem; a rigorous wide-gap treatment would instead integrate the shear-rate
profile across the annulus (Krieger–Elrod method).
Convert torque and speed to shear stress and shear rate. Torque at each
reading is \(T = T_{fs}\times(\%\text{FS}/100)\). The shear stress on the inner (bob)
cylinder wall is
$$\tau = \frac{T}{2\pi r_i^2 L} = \frac{T}{2\pi(0.5)^2(6)} = \frac{T}{9.425}.$$
The narrow-gap shear rate, with the outer cylinder stationary and angular speed
\(\omega = 2\pi N/60\), is
$$\dot\gamma = \frac{\omega\, r_i}{r_o - r_i} = \frac{\omega(0.5)}{0.25} = 2\omega.$$
Applying these to all four readings gives the \(\tau\)–\(\dot\gamma\) table above.
Linearize and fit. Taking logarithms of \(\tau = b\dot\gamma^{\,n}\) gives
\(\ln\tau = \ln b + n\ln\dot\gamma\), a straight line on the log-log plot shown below. A
least-squares fit through the four points gives
$$n = 0.79, \qquad \ln b = 5.43 \;\Rightarrow\; b = 227\ \text{dyn}\cdot\text{s}^{n}/\text{cm}^2.$$
State the result.
$$\boxed{n \approx 0.79,\qquad b \approx 227\ \text{dyn}\cdot\text{s}^{n}/\text{cm}^2\;(\approx 22.7\ \text{Pa}\cdot\text{s}^{n})}$$
Since \(n<1\), the food product is pseudoplastic (shear-thinning).
Log-log plot of shear stress versus shear rate; the four viscometer
readings fall on a straight line of slope \(n = 0.79\), confirming power-law (pseudoplastic)
behaviour over this shear-rate range.