Question 5 of 7: Copper Half-Cell Potential; Electroplating Current and Time
Nivaar worked solution (AI-drafted; not reviewed by a licensed engineer)
Notes on this paper
National Exam 04-BS-11, Properties of Materials — December 2016. 3 hours,
closed-book examination (approved Casio or Sharp calculator only). Candidates attempt any
five of the seven questions for a complete paper, all questions of equal value. All seven
questions are solved below for completeness.
Reference texts: Callister & Rethwisch, Materials Science and
Engineering: An Introduction, 9th ed. (crystal structure, mechanical behaviour, phase
diagrams, polymer viscoelasticity, composites, electrochemistry, fatigue/fracture, heat
treatment and hardenability, concrete).
Question 5: Copper Half-Cell Potential; Electroplating Current and Time (20 marks)
Given. (a) $m_{Cu}=40$ g, $V=2$ L, $M_{Cu}=63.54$ g/mol
(page-1 table), $E^0=+0.337$ V, $n=2$. (b) coating thickness $=500\,\mu$m $=0.05$ cm,
cathode diameter $=2.5$ cm, current density $=400$ A/ft$^2$, $\rho_{Cu}=8.96$ g/cm$^3$,
Faraday’s constant $F=96{,}500$ C/mol.
Find. (a) Electrode potential $E$. (b) Plating current $I$ and time $t$.
Approach
(a) is a direct application of the Nernst equation, using the given formula sheet's form
$E=E^0+(0.0592/n)\log_{10}[\text{ion}]$ at room temperature. (b) combines a geometric/Faraday’s-law
calculation (mass of copper needed for the specified thickness $\rightarrow$ moles
$\rightarrow$ charge) with the specified current density (which fixes the current from the
cathode area alone); time then follows from charge $=$ current $\times$ time.
(a) Nernst equation.
$$E=E^0+\frac{0.0592}{n}\log_{10}[\text{Cu}^{2+}]=0.337+\frac{0.0592}{2}\log_{10}(0.3148)$$
$$=0.337+0.0296(-0.5019)=0.337-0.0149$$
$$\boxed{E\approx0.322\ \text{V}}$$
(slightly below $E^0$, as expected: the Cu$^{2+}$ concentration here is below the 1 mol/L
standard-state reference, and the Nernst correction is small since $\log_{10}(0.31)$ is only
mildly negative).
(b) Cathode area and plating current. One face of the 2.5 cm-diameter
disc:
$$A=\frac{\pi}{4}(2.5)^2=4.909\ \text{cm}^2=4.909/929.0=5.284\times10^{-3}\ \text{ft}^2$$
$$I=(\text{C.D.})\times A=400(5.284\times10^{-3})$$
$$\boxed{I\approx2.11\ \text{A}}$$
(b) Mass of copper to be deposited.
$$\text{Volume}=A\times\text{thickness}=4.909\ \text{cm}^2\times0.05\ \text{cm}=0.2454\ \text{cm}^3$$
$$m=\text{Volume}\times\rho_{Cu}=0.2454(8.96)=2.199\ \text{g}$$
(b) Plating time from Faraday’s law. Using the given formula
$w=ItM/(nF)$, solved for $t$:
$$t=\frac{w\,n\,F}{I\,M}=\frac{2.199(2)(96{,}500)}{2.113(63.54)}=\frac{424{,}400}{134.3}$$
$$\boxed{t\approx3161\ \text{s}\approx52.7\ \text{min}\ (0.878\ \text{hr})}$$
Check: solved for plating on one face of the circular cathode
(the more common textbook setup for “electroplate a layer onto a circular cathode”);
if both faces are plated simultaneously, double the required copper mass and charge, which doubles
the plating time to ≈105 min at the same current (the current itself, fixed by current
density $\times$ area, is unaffected by this assumption).