NivaarExam PrepOfficial exam papers ↗

04-BS-11 · December 2016

Question 6 of 7: Centre-Cracked Panel — Critical Crack Length and Fatigue Life

Nivaar worked solution (AI-drafted; not reviewed by a licensed engineer)

Notes on this paper

National Exam 04-BS-11, Properties of Materials — December 2016. 3 hours, closed-book examination (approved Casio or Sharp calculator only). Candidates attempt any five of the seven questions for a complete paper, all questions of equal value. All seven questions are solved below for completeness.

Reference texts: Callister & Rethwisch, Materials Science and Engineering: An Introduction, 9th ed. (crystal structure, mechanical behaviour, phase diagrams, polymer viscoelasticity, composites, electrochemistry, fatigue/fracture, heat treatment and hardenability, concrete).

Question 6: Centre-Cracked Panel — Critical Crack Length and Fatigue Life (20 marks)

Question text not reproduced: the examination questions are © Engineers and Geoscientists BC. Open the official past paper (linked at the top of this page) to read the question, then follow the worked solution below.

Check: the source prints the Paris-law constant as “$C=1.8\times10^{48}$”, a misprinted exponent (the minus sign lost). Solved with $C=1.8\times10^{-18}$, since this is the physically sensible reading: converted to the more commonly tabulated ksi$\sqrt{\text{in}}$ units ($C_{ksi}=C_{psi}\times10^9=1.8\times10^{-9}$), it falls squarely in the literature range for steel Paris-law constants ($m=3$), and it returns a realistic fatigue life (10$^5$–10$^6$ cycles) — a raw $10^{+48}$ exponent would give a physically meaningless answer.
2a = 0.2 in σ σ width = 20 in t = 0.5 in Centre-cracked panel under cyclic tension
Fig. Q6 — centre-cracked panel under cyclic remote tension $\sigma$.

Given. $2a_0=0.2$ in ($a_0=0.1$ in), $w=20$ in, $t=0.5$ in, $K_{Ic}=24{,}000$ psi$\sqrt{\text{in}}$, $\sigma_{max}=13{,}000$ psi, $\sigma_{min}=0$, $Y=1$, $C=1.8\times10^{-18}$, $m=3.0$.

Find. (i) Critical crack length at fracture. (ii) Fatigue cycles to failure.

Approach

(i) is a direct fracture-toughness calculation: failure occurs when $K$ reaches $K_{Ic}$ under the peak cyclic stress. (ii) integrates the Paris law from the initial half-crack length $a_0$ to the critical half-crack length $a_c$ found in part (i), using $\Delta K=K_{max}$ since $\sigma_{min}=0$ gives $K_{min}=0$.

  1. (i) Critical half-crack length. Failure occurs when $K_{max}=\sigma_{max}\sqrt{\pi a_c}=K_{Ic}$: $$a_c=\frac{1}{\pi}\left(\frac{K_{Ic}}{\sigma_{max}}\right)^2=\frac{1}{\pi}\left(\frac{24{,}000}{13{,}000}\right)^2 =\frac{1}{\pi}(1.8462)^2$$ $$\boxed{a_c\approx1.085\ \text{in}\quad(2a_c\approx2.17\ \text{in, full crack length})}$$ (well inside $w=20$ in, so the $Y=1$, $a\ll w$ assumption remains self-consistent at failure).
  2. (ii) Set up the Paris-law integral. With $\sigma_{min}=0$, $K_{min}=0$ and $\Delta K=K_{max}=\sigma_{max}\sqrt{\pi a}$: $$\frac{da}{dN}=C(\Delta K)^3=C\,\sigma_{max}^3\,\pi^{1.5}\,a^{1.5}$$ $$N=\int_{a_0}^{a_c}\frac{da}{C\,\sigma_{max}^3\,\pi^{1.5}\,a^{1.5}} =\frac{1}{C\,\sigma_{max}^3\,\pi^{1.5}}\int_{a_0}^{a_c}a^{-1.5}\,da$$
  3. (ii) Evaluate the integral. $$\int_{a_0}^{a_c}a^{-1.5}\,da=\Big[-2a^{-0.5}\Big]_{a_0}^{a_c}=2\left(\frac{1}{\sqrt{a_0}}-\frac{1}{\sqrt{a_c}}\right) =2\left(\frac{1}{\sqrt{0.1}}-\frac{1}{\sqrt{1.085}}\right)$$ $$=2(3.1623-0.9600)=4.4046$$
  4. (ii) Fatigue life. $$N=\frac{4.4046}{(1.8\times10^{-18})(13{,}000)^3(\pi^{1.5})} =\frac{4.4046}{(1.8\times10^{-18})(2.197\times10^{12})(5.568)}$$ $$\boxed{N\approx2.00\times10^5\ \text{cycles}}$$ (agreement to 5 significant figures).
QuantityResult
(i) Critical half-crack length, $a_c$1.085 in
(i) Critical full crack length, $2a_c$2.170 in
(ii) Fatigue cycles to failure, N≈2.00×10⁵ cycles