Question 3 of 7: Cold Work and Annealing — Hardness Response of Brass
Nivaar worked solution (AI-drafted; not reviewed by a licensed engineer)
Notes on this paper
National Exam 04-BS-11, Properties of Materials — May 2018. 3 hours,
closed-book examination (approved Casio or Sharp calculator only). Notes on the paper state that
any five questions constitute a complete paper and only the first five questions appearing in the
answer book are marked, with all questions of equal value. All seven questions are solved below
for completeness.
Reference texts: Callister & Rethwisch, Materials Science and
Engineering: An Introduction, 9th ed. (crystal structure and packing, polymer molecular
weight, cold work and annealing, corrosion and diffusion, composites, ceramic glasses).
Question 3: Cold Work and Annealing — Hardness Response of Brass (20 marks)
Given. Original thickness $t_0=0.250''$; nine rolling passes reduce thickness
in $0.025''$ steps down to $0.050''$. Percent cold work $\%\text{CW}=100(t_0-t_f)/t_0$ (area
reduction in rolling is proportional to thickness reduction for a fixed width). The sample rolled
to $0.100''$ ($\%\text{CW}=100(0.250-0.100)/0.250=60\%$) is subsequently annealed at seven
temperatures, $100^\circ$C to $700^\circ$C, $10$ min each.
Find. Sketch and explain (a) hardness vs. $\%$ cold work; (b) hardness vs.
annealing temperature for the $60\%$-cold-worked stock.
Approach
Part (a) is governed by strain (work) hardening: dislocation density rises with plastic strain,
and dislocations increasingly obstruct each other's motion, so the stress needed to continue
deforming — and hence hardness — rises steeply at first and then levels off as the
dislocation network saturates. Part (b) is governed by the three sequential annealing stages
(recovery, recrystallization, grain growth), each with a distinct hardness signature.
(a) Hardness vs. cold work — shape of the curve. Hardness rises
steeply over roughly the first $20$–$30\%$ CW, where dislocation density is still low and
each additional dislocation created by rolling substantially increases the tangle/pile-up density,
then the curve flattens toward a plateau at higher $\%$CW as the microstructure
approaches a saturation dislocation density (further deformation mostly rearranges existing
tangles into cells rather than adding proportionally as much new obstruction). This is the
classic strain-hardening (work-hardening) curve, $\sigma\propto\varepsilon^n$-type behaviour
reflected in hardness.
(b) Hardness vs. annealing temperature — three stages. Over
$100^\circ$–$250^\circ$C (recovery), hardness stays nearly flat or drops
only slightly — dislocations rearrange into lower-energy configurations (polygonization,
climb/annihilation of opposite-sign dislocations) but the overall dislocation density,
and hence hardness, changes little. Between roughly $250^\circ$ and $420^\circ$C
(recrystallization), hardness falls sharply as strain-free new
grains nucleate and consume the deformed microstructure by grain-boundary migration, eliminating
most of the dislocation density essentially in one step. Above $\sim\!420^\circ$C
(grain growth), hardness continues to decrease, but only gradually,
as the now strain-free grains coarsen (larger average grain size, fewer grain boundaries) and the
Hall–Petch strengthening contribution from grain boundaries correspondingly weakens.
Fig. Q3(a) — hardness rises steeply at low $\%$CW then plateaus as the
dislocation structure saturates (C26000 brass, 9 rolling passes).
Fig. Q3(b) — hardness vs. $10$-min annealing temperature for the
$60\%$-cold-worked strip: flat through recovery, a sharp drop through recrystallization, then a
gentler decline through grain growth.
Stage
Hardness behaviour
Mechanism
(a) Increasing $\%$CW
Rises steeply, then plateaus
Dislocation multiplication & tangling, then saturation
(b) Recovery ($\sim$100–250$^\circ$C)
Nearly flat
Dislocation rearrangement, little density loss
(b) Recrystallization ($\sim$250–420$^\circ$C)
Sharp drop
New strain-free grains consume cold-worked structure