Question 3 of 10: Methylophilus methylotrophus — Maximum Yield and Oxygen Demand
Nivaar worked solution (AI-drafted; not reviewed by a licensed engineer)
Notes on this paper
National Exams — December 2015 — 04-BS-13, Biology. Three-hour, closed-book exam (one double-sided aid sheet permitted, approved Casio/Sharp calculator allowed). Format: Part I offers 6 questions (any 3 constitute a complete answer, 20 marks each) and Part II offers 4 questions (any 2 constitute a complete answer, 20 marks each) — a full paper is 5 questions. All 10 are solved below for completeness. Q1–Q4, Q7, and Q8 are calculation questions; Q5, Q9, and Q10 are essay questions; Q6 is a derivation.
Reference texts: Shuler & Kargi, Bioprocess Engineering: Basic Concepts (2nd ed., Prentice Hall) — elemental/electron balances, yield coefficients, fermenter mass balances, growth kinetics; Madigan et al., Brock Biology of Microorganisms (15th ed., Pearson) — bacterial classification, fungal reproduction, plasmid biology; Toledo, Fundamentals of Food Process Engineering (3rd ed., Springer) — plant/animal tissue structure and mechanical properties.
Question 3: Methylophilus methylotrophus — Maximum Yield and Oxygen Demand (20 marks)
Find. (a) $c_{\max}$, the maximum molar biomass yield (mol biomass/mol methanol); (b) $a$, the O2 demand at the actual (42%-of-maximum) yield.
Approach. Methanol supplies only 1 carbon per mole, so $c\le1$ purely from the carbon balance — the true ceiling here is carbon-limited, not electron-limited (a naive $\gamma_S/\gamma_B$ ratio would over-predict $c_{\max}>1$, which is impossible with a single-carbon substrate). The thermodynamic maximum is therefore the case where all substrate carbon is fixed into biomass ($c=1$, no CO2 by-product, $e=0$); the electron and atom balances then jointly fix how much O2 is still needed to dispose of the substrate's surplus available electrons. Part (b) repeats the same balance machinery at $c=0.42(1)$.
Part (a): carbon-balance ceiling. With 1 C atom per mole methanol and the biomass formula normalized per C-atom, $1=c+e$. Maximum $c$ occurs at $e=0$:
$$\boxed{c_{\max}=1.0\ \text{mol biomass/mol methanol}}.$$
Cross-check via the electron balance. $\gamma_S(1)=\gamma_B c+4a\Rightarrow a=\dfrac{6(1)-4.3(1)}{4}=0.425$ — exact match, and the O-balance in step 2 closes exactly (1.850 both sides), confirming $c_{\max}=1$ with $a=0.425$, $b=0.22$, $d=1.49$ is a fully self-consistent stoichiometry.
Part (b): actual yield at 42% of maximum.
$$c_{\text{actual}}=0.42\,c_{\max}=0.42(1.0)=\boxed{0.42\ \text{mol biomass/mol methanol}}.$$
Now $e\ne0$ (some carbon is respired to CO2 instead of fixed): C: $e=1-c=0.58$. N: $b=0.22(0.42)=0.0924$. H: $d=\dfrac{4+3(0.0924)-1.68(0.42)}{2}=1.786$.
Oxygen demand at the actual yield. O: $1+2a=0.36c+d+2e=0.36(0.42)+1.786+2(0.58)=3.097\Rightarrow$
$$a=\boxed{1.049\ \text{mol O}_2\text{/mol methanol}}.$$
Electron-balance cross-check: $a=[6(1)-4.3(0.42)]/4=1.049$ — identical. Since MW methanol $=$ MW O2 $=32$, the mass ratio equals the same numeric value: $1.049$ g O2/g methanol.
Quantity
Result
(a) Maximum molar biomass yield, $c_{\max}$
1.0 mol biomass/mol methanol
at $c_{\max}$: $a$, $b$, $d$
0.425, 0.22, 1.49 mol/mol methanol
(b) Actual yield, $c_{\text{actual}}$ (42% of max)