NivaarExam PrepOfficial exam papers ↗

04-BS-13 · May 2016

Question 6 of 9: Cooling Requirement for Immobilized-Cell Glutamic Acid Production

Nivaar worked solution (AI-drafted; not reviewed by a licensed engineer)

Notes on this paper

National Exams — May 2016 — 04-BS-13, Biology. Three-hour, closed-book exam (one double-sided aid sheet permitted, approved calculator allowed). Format: Part I offers 5 questions (any 3 constitute a complete answer, 20 marks each; Q2 itself offers two alternative sub-problems) and Part II offers 3 questions (any 2 constitute a complete answer, 20 marks each) — a full paper is 5 questions. All 8 numbered questions (with both alternatives of Q2) are solved below for completeness. Q2–Q7 are calculation/derivation questions; Q1, Q6(a)(b)(d), and Q8 are essay questions.

Reference texts: Shuler & Kargi, Bioprocess Engineering: Basic Concepts (2nd ed., Prentice Hall) — elemental/electron balances, yield coefficients, fermenter mass and energy balances, growth kinetics; Madigan et al., Brock Biology of Microorganisms (15th ed., Pearson) — bacterial/viral structure, rapid methods, MPN; Toledo, Fundamentals of Food Process Engineering (3rd ed., Springer) — plant tissue structure and mechanical properties.

Question 5: Cooling Requirement for Immobilized-Cell Glutamic Acid Production (20 marks)

Question text not reproduced: the examination questions are © Engineers and Geoscientists BC. Open the official past paper (linked at the top of this page) to read the question, then follow the worked solution below.

Given.

QuantityValue
ReactionC6H12O6 + 1.5O2 + NH3 → C5H9O4N + CO2 + 3H2O
Liquid feed2000 kg/h, 4% glucose (w/w), 25°C
Product stream0.5% residual glucose (w/w), 25°C
$\Delta h_c^{\circ}$: glucose / NH3 / O2 / glutamic acid−2805 / −382.6 / 0 / −2244.1 kJ/mol
$C_p$ (liquid mixture and water)4.18 kJ/(kg·K)

Find. (a) rate of heat removal required to hold the reactor at 25°C (kJ/h); (b) adiabatic temperature rise if cooling is not provided.

Approach. The liquid feed, product, reactor and off-gas are all at 25°C, so the liquid-stream sensible-heat terms cancel; the one exception is the sparged gas, which enters at 15°C and leaves at 25°C and therefore absorbs sensible heat that the cooling system does not have to remove. The dominant term is the heat of reaction itself — found via Hess's law from the given heats of combustion (CO2 and H2O, being fully oxidized, contribute $\Delta h_c^{\circ}=0$ and drop out of the products' combustion-heat sum). Multiplying by the molar rate of glucose consumption (from a glucose mass balance on the liquid stream) gives the heat released; subtracting the sensible heat taken up by the incoming 15°C gas gives the cooling duty for part (a); letting that surplus heat instead warm both outlet streams (liquid and gas) gives part (b).

Immobilized-cell reactor (25 000 L, 25°C)(CV boundary — dashed)Feed: 4% glucose2000 kg/h, 25°CProduct: 0.5% residualsugar, 25°CGas: 12% NH3 in air4 VVM, 15°COff-gas, 25°CQ̇ removed (cooling)
Figure 4. Control-volume energy balance: liquid streams and off-gas at 25°C; the sparged gas enters at 15°C and absorbs part of the reaction heat as it warms.
  1. Heat of reaction via Hess's law (heats of combustion). $\Delta H_{rxn}=\sum\Delta h_c^{\circ}(\text{reactants})-\sum\Delta h_c^{\circ}(\text{products})$, with CO2 and H2O contributing zero on the product side: $$\Delta H_{rxn}=\big[-2805+1.5(0)+(-382.6)\big]-\big[-2244.1+0+3(0)\big]=-3187.6-(-2244.1)=\boxed{-943.5\ \text{kJ/mol glucose reacted}}$$ (exothermic — 943.5 kJ released per mole glucose consumed).
  2. Glucose consumption rate from a liquid-stream mass balance. Treating the liquid mass flow as essentially unchanged from feed to product (2000 kg/h; the dissolved-gas mass transferred is small on this scale): $$\text{glucose in}=2000(0.04)=80\ \text{kg/h},\qquad \text{glucose out}=2000(0.005)=10\ \text{kg/h},$$ $$\text{glucose consumed}=80-10=70\ \text{kg/h}=\frac{70\,000\ \text{g/h}}{180\ \text{g/mol}}=\boxed{389\ \text{mol/h}}.$$
  3. Heat released by reaction. $$\dot Q_{rxn}=|\Delta H_{rxn}|\times(\text{mol glucose/h})=943.5(388.9)=3.669\times10^{5}\ \text{kJ/h}.$$
  4. Sensible heat absorbed by the sparged gas (15°C → 25°C). Gas volumetric flow $=4\ \text{vvm}\times25\ \text{m}^3=100\ \text{m}^3/\text{min}$ at 1 atm and 15°C, so by the ideal-gas law $$\dot n_{gas}=\frac{PV}{RT}=\frac{101\,325(100)}{8.314(288.15)}=4230\ \text{mol/min}=2.538\times10^{5}\ \text{mol/h}$$ (12% NH3 = 30 450 mol/h, 88% air = 223 300 mol/h). Taking molar heat capacities of air $\approx29.1$ and NH3 $\approx35.1$ J/(mol·K) near room temperature (the given 4.18 kJ/(kg·K) applies to the liquid, not the gas), the gas heat-capacity rate is $\dot n c_p=223\,300(29.1)+30\,450(35.1)=7.57\times10^{3}$ kJ/(h·K), and $$\dot Q_{gas}=7.57\times10^{3}(25-15)=7.57\times10^{4}\ \text{kJ/h}.$$ The NH3 (389 mol/h) and O2 (583 mol/h) actually consumed are <1% of the gas flow, so the off-gas flow is taken equal to the inlet flow.
  5. Part (a): cooling duty. Energy balance at steady state (all enthalpies referenced to 25°C): $$\dot Q_{cooling}=\dot Q_{rxn}-\dot Q_{gas}=3.669\times10^{5}-0.757\times10^{5}=\boxed{2.91\times10^{5}\ \text{kJ/h}\ (\approx81\ \text{kW})}.$$
  6. Part (b): temperature rise with no cooling. Assuming the same reaction rate and conversion, the 2.91×105 kJ/h no longer removed must instead raise the temperature of everything leaving the reactor (liquid product and off-gas) by $\Delta T$ above 25°C: $$\Delta T=\frac{\dot Q_{cooling}}{\dot m_{liq}C_p+\dot n_{gas}c_p}=\frac{2.912\times10^{5}}{2000(4.18)+7.57\times10^{3}}=\frac{2.912\times10^{5}}{1.593\times10^{4}}=\boxed{18.3^{\circ}\text{C}}$$ — the reactor would climb from 25°C to $\approx43^{\circ}$C, well above the optimum for this organism, which is why active cooling is essential. (Crediting the liquid alone, as if the gas did not warm, would overstate the rise at $2.912\times10^{5}/8360=34.8^{\circ}$C.)
QuantityResult
$\Delta H_{rxn}$−943.5 kJ/mol glucose
Glucose consumed70 kg/h = 389 mol/h
Heat released by reaction3.67×105 kJ/h
Sensible heat taken up by sparged gas (15→25°C)7.6×104 kJ/h
(a) Cooling requirement2.91×105 kJ/h (≈81 kW)
(b) Temperature rise, no cooling18.3°C (25→≈43°C)
Check
Assumptions adopted (the paper gives no gas-phase data): (1) liquid mass flow unchanged from feed to product (<1% of the gas is absorbed) when back-calculating glucose consumed; (2) gas molar heat capacities air ≈29.1 and NH3 ≈35.1 J/(mol·K); (3) evaporation of water into the sparged gas is neglected, as the paper supplies no humidity or latent-heat data — in a real plant, humidifying 100 m3/min of dry gas would carry away a large additional share of the heat. (4) Part (b) assumes reaction rate and conversion unchanged at the higher temperature.
Two assumptions are made explicit by the problem's own reference-temperature statement and are standard for this class of estimate: (1) the liquid mass flow is assumed unchanged from feed to product (dissolved/entrained gas mass is small relative to 2000 kg/h) when back-calculating glucose consumed; (2) the adiabatic temperature rise in part (b) is computed on the liquid stream alone, consistent with $C_p$ being specified for "mixture and water" rather than for the sparged air/NH3 gas phase.