Nivaar worked solution (AI-drafted; not reviewed by a licensed engineer)
Notes on this paper
National Examination, 04-BS-16 Discrete Mathematics, May 2016. Closed book, no aids. The exam instructs "answer 10 of 12 questions"; every question is answered below as a complete study resource.
Reference texts: Rosen, Discrete Mathematics and Its Applications, 7th ed. (logic, induction, combinatorics, probability, relations, graph theory).
Given. (a) Two logical forms in $p,q,r$. (b) A conditional whose antecedent is the fixed proposition "$2\gt 10$". (c) The existential statement from Q1(b). (d) The proposition $(\neg p\land q)\lor\neg r$.
Find. (a) A proof of the equivalence (truth table or logical laws). (b) The truth value. (c) The negation, simplified. (d) The dual (swap $\land\leftrightarrow\lor$; no constants to swap here).
Approach. (a) build the 8-row truth table for $p,q,r$ (or push the negation using $p\to r\equiv\neg p\lor r$); (b) a conditional with a false antecedent is vacuously true, independent of the consequent; (c) push $\neg$ through the quantifier and the inequality; (d) apply the duality principle.
(a) Prove $(p\to r)\lor(q\to r)\equiv(p\land q)\to r$. Rewrite every conditional with $\to$ eliminated: $p\to r\equiv\neg p\lor r$, so the left side is $\neg p\lor r\lor\neg q\lor r \equiv \neg p\lor\neg q\lor r$. The right side is $(p\land q)\to r\equiv \neg(p\land q)\lor r \equiv (\neg p\lor\neg q)\lor r$ by De Morgan. Both sides reduce to the identical clause $\neg p\lor\neg q\lor r$:
$$(p\to r)\lor(q\to r)\ \equiv\ \neg p\lor\neg q\lor r\ \equiv\ (p\land q)\to r$$
A full 8-row truth table over $p,q,r$ confirms both sides agree on every row. $\boxed{(p\to r)\lor(q\to r)\equiv(p\land q)\to r}$
(b) Truth value of "If $2\gt 10$ then $\forall x\,x=x+1$". The antecedent "$2\gt 10$" is false. A conditional with a false antecedent is true regardless of the consequent (vacuous truth) — it does not matter that "$\forall x\,x=x+1$" is itself false. $\boxed{\text{TRUE (vacuously)}}$
(c) Negation of $\exists n\,(n+1\gt n^2)$. Push the negation through the existential quantifier (turning it universal) and negate the inequality:
$$\neg\exists n\,(n+1\gt n^2)\ \equiv\ \forall n\,\neg(n+1\gt n^2)\ \equiv\ \forall n\,(n+1\le n^2)$$
$\boxed{\forall n\,(n+1\le n^2)}$
(d) Dual of $(\neg p\land q)\lor\neg r$. The dual of a proposition built only from $\land,\lor$ (no $T/F$ constants) swaps every $\land\leftrightarrow\lor$ and leaves the literals untouched:
$$(\neg p\land q)\lor\neg r\quad\xrightarrow{\text{dual}}\quad(\neg p\lor q)\land\neg r$$
$\boxed{(\neg p\lor q)\land\neg r}$
Question 2 – results
Part
Result
a
Equivalence proved: both sides $\equiv \neg p\lor\neg q\lor r$