NivaarExam PrepOfficial exam papers ↗

04-BS-3 · December 2018

Question 3 of 6: Question 3 (paper Question III) — Minimum Friction Coefficient for a Tong-Lifted Crate (Part A · Statics, equal value)

Nivaar worked solution (AI-drafted; not reviewed by a licensed engineer)

Notes on this paper

National Examination 04-BS-3, Statics and Dynamics — 2018-Dec. Candidates were required to complete 2 questions from PART A (Statics) and 2 questions from PART B (Dynamics); every question is solved below so this paper serves as a complete study resource (Questions 1-3 = paper Part A, I-III; Questions 4-6 = paper Part B, IV-VI).

Reference texts: Hibbeler, Engineering Mechanics: Statics (14th ed.); Hibbeler, Engineering Mechanics: Dynamics (14th ed.).

Check — source reconstruction notes. (2) Question 1's figure gives explicit coordinates for D, E, F and an explicit height (3 m) for wall anchor C, but not a separate height for wall anchor B; reading the drawing against its own calibrated vertical scale (using the printed "3 m" and "1 m" dimensions as reference) places B at very nearly the same height as C, and only that reading makes the six equilibrium equations for the 5-unknown system (3 reactions at A + 2 cable tensions) consistent AND returns exact, textbook-clean numbers (cable lengths of exactly 3 m each, tensions of exactly 4200 N each) — strong corroborating evidence for the reconstruction. B = (0, -2, 3) m and C = (0, 2, 3) m (both relative to A) are used below. (3) Question 3's figure dimensions the horizontal offset of the top pivots E, F (275 mm) and the vertical drop from E/F to C/D and from C/D to A/B (500 mm each), but not a horizontal offset for C, D; the crate's own 300 mm grip width fixes A, B at ±150 mm, so the jaw arm C-A is read as tapering inward from x = -275 mm (at C, in line with E) to x = -150 mm (at A) over its 500 mm drop — the taper is placed on the lower arm segment (C to A) rather than the upper one (E to C), consistent with the visible bend in the source drawing.

Question 3 (paper Question III) — Minimum Friction Coefficient for a Tong-Lifted Crate (Part A · Statics, equal value)

Question text not reproduced: the examination questions are © Engineers and Geoscientists BC. Open the official past paper (linked at the top of this page) to read the question, then follow the worked solution below.

Given. Symmetric scissor-tong: top links H–E and H–F each at 30° from the vertical line of action of lifting force P; horizontal offset of E, F from that line = 275 mm; arms E–C and F–D drop 500 mm; horizontal bar C–D; lower arms C–A and D–B drop a further 500 mm and taper inward to grip blocks A, B spaced 300 mm apart (crate width), straddling centreline G. Crate mass 50 kg.

Given data
ItemValue
Top link angle from vertical30° (links H-E, H-F)
Horizontal offset, E/F from centreline275 mm
Vertical drop, E/F to C/D500 mm
Vertical drop, C/D to A/B500 mm
Grip spacing (crate width), A to B300 mm
Crate mass50 kg

Find. The smallest coefficient of static friction $\mu_s$ at A and B so the crate does not slip.

P H E F C D A B G 30°30° 275 mm500 mm500 mm300 mm
Figure 3. Symmetric tong mechanism: link H–E–C–A (left jaw) mirrors H–F–D–B (right jaw); bar C–D is horizontal; blocks A, B grip the 50 kg crate.

Approach. Use the crate's own vertical equilibrium to find the required friction force at each grip, then take the rigid-body equilibrium of one jaw (E–C–A) to find the normal (clamping) force the mechanism actually delivers; $\mu_s=f/N$ at the point of impending slip.

  1. Friction required to support the crate. By symmetry the two grips share the weight equally: $\sum F_y=0$ on the crate: $2f-mg=0\Rightarrow f=\dfrac{50(9.81)}{2}=\boxed{245.25\ \text{N}}$ at each of A and B.
  2. Jaw geometry (relative to H at the origin). $|HE|=275/\sin30^\circ=550\ \text{mm}$. Taking the crate-side taper on the lower arm: $E=(-275,-476.3)$, $C=(-275,-976.3)$, $A=(-150,-1476.3)$ mm.
  3. Vertical equilibrium of jaw E–C–A. Only the link tension $T_{HE}$ (direction $\mathbf{u}=(0.5,0.866)$ toward H) and the friction reaction ($-f$ on the jaw at A) have y-components: $\sum F_y=0$: $T_{HE}(0.866)-245.25=0\Rightarrow \boxed{T_{HE}=283.2\ \text{N}}$.
  4. Moment equilibrium of the jaw about H (eliminates the unknown bar force $F_{CD}$, which passes through neither H directly, but is combined with the other two equations to isolate $N_A$). Solving the 3×3 system ($\sum F_x=0$, $\sum F_y=0$, $\sum M_H=0$) for the three unknowns $T_{HE}$, $F_{CD}$, $N_A$ gives $\boxed{N_A=202.9\ \text{N}}$ (magnitude of the crate's outward push on the jaw at A, which by Newton's third law equals the jaw's clamping force on the crate).
  5. Minimum friction coefficient. At impending slip, $f=\mu_s N_A$: $\mu_s=\dfrac{245.25}{202.9}=\boxed{1.21}$.
Final results
QuantityValue
Friction force required, each grip245.25 N
Clamping (normal) force delivered, each grip202.9 N
Smallest coefficient of static friction $\mu_s$1.21
Check — this mechanism's specific proportions (a relatively shallow 30° top-link angle combined with a modest 275 mm offset) produce a clamping force smaller than the required friction force, so $\mu_s\gt 1$ is genuinely required here; this is unusual but not impossible for a textured/rubber-faced gripping pad designed for exactly this duty.