NivaarExam PrepOfficial exam papers ↗

04-BS-4 · December 2018

Question 5 of 7: Power-Factor-Correction Capacitor Switched Across an Inductive Load

Nivaar worked solution (AI-drafted; not reviewed by a licensed engineer)

Question 5: Power-Factor-Correction Capacitor Switched Across an Inductive Load (20 marks)

Question text not reproduced: the examination questions are © Engineers and Geoscientists BC. Open the official past paper (linked at the top of this page) to read the question, then follow the worked solution below.

Given. The source feeds the line impedance $Z_{Line}=R_{Line}+jX_{Line}$, which reaches a load impedance $Z_{Load}=R_{Load}+jX_{Load}$. A switch in series with capacitor $X_C$ places that branch in parallel with the load when closed (a shunt power-factor-correction capacitor -- a standard configuration, Sadiku Ch. 11); $V_s(t)$ has a $100\text{ V}$ rms amplitude at $60\text{ Hz}$.

Given data
QuantityValue
$R_{Line},\ X_{Line}$$2\,\Omega,\ 2\,\Omega$
$R_{Load},\ X_{Load}$$6\,\Omega,\ 4\,\Omega$
$X_C$$100\,\Omega$
$V_s$ (rms)$100\text{ V}$

Find. $|I_s|$ and $P_{source}$ (switch open); $P_{line},P_{load}$ (switch open); $|I_s|$ (switch closed); $P_{line},P_{load}$ (switch closed).

+v_s(t)X_LineR_LineSX_CX_LoadR_Load
Figure 5: Line + load with switched PF-correction capacitor (RLine=2Ω, XLine=2Ω, RLoad=6Ω, XLoad=4Ω, Xc=100Ω)

Approach. Work in rms phasors throughout (the given $V_s(t)$ amplitude is $\sqrt2\times100$, i.e. $100\text{ V}$ rms). Switch open: simple series circuit. Switch closed: the capacitor branch is a shunt in parallel with the load; recombine the total impedance and re-split the current to the load.

  1. a) Switch open -- source current and power. $$Z_{tot} = Z_{Line}+Z_{Load} = (2+j2)+(6+j4) = 8+j6\,\Omega = 10\angle{36.87^\circ}\,\Omega$$ $$I_s = \dfrac{V_s}{Z_{tot}} = \dfrac{100\angle0^\circ}{10\angle{36.87^\circ}} = 10\angle{-36.87^\circ}\text{ A} \;\Rightarrow\; \boxed{|I_s| = 10\text{ A}}$$ $$P_{source} = |V_s||I_s|\cos(36.87^\circ) = (100)(10)(0.8) = \boxed{800\text{ W}}$$
  2. b) Switch open -- line and load power. The same current flows through both impedances in this series loop: $$P_{line} = |I_s|^2R_{Line} = (10)^2(2) = \boxed{200\text{ W}}, \qquad P_{load} = |I_s|^2R_{Load} = (10)^2(6) = \boxed{600\text{ W}}$$ (check: $200+600=800\text{ W} = P_{source}$ ✓).
  3. c) Switch closed -- source current. The capacitor ($Z_C=-j100\,\Omega$) now parallels the load: $$Z_{par} = \dfrac{Z_CZ_{Load}}{Z_C+Z_{Load}} = \dfrac{(-j100)(6+j4)}{-j100+6+j4} = 6.485+j3.761\,\Omega$$ $$Z_{tot} = Z_{Line}+Z_{par} = 8.485+j5.761\,\Omega = 10.256\angle{34.18^\circ}\,\Omega$$ $$I_s = \dfrac{100\angle0^\circ}{10.256\angle{34.18^\circ}} = 9.750\angle{-34.18^\circ}\text{ A} \;\Rightarrow\; \boxed{|I_s| = 9.750\text{ A}}$$ (lower than the open-switch $10\text{ A}$, and closer to unity power factor -- the classic effect of shunt PF correction.)
  4. d) Switch closed -- line and load power. Line power uses the full source current; load power needs the current split into the $Z_{Load}$ branch: $$P_{line} = |I_s|^2R_{Line} = (9.750)^2(2) = \boxed{190.1\text{ W}}$$ $$V_{par} = I_sZ_{par} = (9.750\angle{-34.18^\circ})(7.497\angle{30.11^\circ}) = 73.10\angle{-4.06^\circ}\text{ V}$$ $$I_{load} = \dfrac{V_{par}}{Z_{Load}} = \dfrac{73.10\angle{-4.06^\circ}}{7.211\angle{33.69^\circ}} = 10.14\angle{-37.75^\circ}\text{ A}$$ $$P_{load} = |I_{load}|^2R_{Load} = (10.14)^2(6) = \boxed{616.5\text{ W}}$$ (check: $P_{source}=|V_s||I_s|\cos(34.18^\circ)=806.6\text{ W}\approx190.1+616.5=806.6\text{ W}$ ✓.)
Final Results -- Question 5
QuantitySwitch openSwitch closed
$|I_s|$$10.0\text{ A}$$9.750\text{ A}$
$P_{source}$$800\text{ W}$$806.6\text{ W}$
$P_{line}$$200\text{ W}$$190.1\text{ W}$
$P_{load}$$600\text{ W}$$616.5\text{ W}$

Closing the switch reduces the source current from $10.0\text{ A}$ to $9.750\text{ A}$ while the load actually absorbs slightly more real power ($616.5\text{ W}$ vs. $600\text{ W}$), because less real power is now lost across the line impedance -- exactly the economic motivation for shunt power-factor correction on a distribution feeder.