NivaarExam PrepOfficial exam papers ↗

24-Bld-A2 Elementary Structural Design · December 2017

Question 7 of 7: Glulam timber column ABC for a farm building

Nivaar worked solution (AI-drafted; not reviewed by a licensed engineer)

Notes on this paper

National Examinations December 2017 — 07-Bld-A2 Elementary Structural Design, 3 hours, closed book (handbooks/textbooks permitted). Answer five: two of Questions A1–A3, two of B1–B3, and the one question C1 (this solution set, per pipeline convention, answers all seven). All loads shown in the exam are unfactored.

Reference texts: CSA S16:19, Design of Steel Structures; Salmon & Johnson, Steel Structures: Design and Behavior; CSA A23.3:19, Design of Concrete Structures; MacGregor & Bartlett, Reinforced Concrete: Mechanics and Design; CSA O86:19, Engineering Design in Wood; Canadian Wood Council, Wood Design Manual.

Check – assumptions applied throughout this solution set (the exam gives unfactored loads without separating dead/live, per Note 6, and instructs "assume any other data required"):

  • All specified (unfactored) loads are factored by a single combined load factor of 1.5 for ULS design, consistent with treating an undifferentiated load as governed by the live-load-dominant NBCC combination.
  • Material grades: structural steel plate/tie/beam – G40.21 350W (Fy=350 MPa); concrete f’c=35 MPa, reinforcement fy=400 MPa (as given for B1–B3); glulam – Douglas Fir-Larch 20f-E (fb=25.6 MPa, fc=30.2 MPa, E=12400 MPa, E05=9500 MPa, per CSA O86/Wood Design Manual).
  • Concrete cover/bar placement (exact stirrup and layer detail not dimensioned on the exam figures) is assumed at a standard 40–50 mm clear cover, giving effective depths stated with each question.

Question C1: Glulam timber column ABC for a farm building (8 + 6 + 6 marks)

Question text not reproduced: the examination questions are © Engineers and Geoscientists BC. Open the official past paper (linked at the top of this page) to read the question, then follow the worked solution below.

Given. Same frame and loads as Figure B2 (N=100 kN, M=400 kN·m unfactored, governing over B–C); Douglas Fir-Larch glulam 20f-E (fb=25.6 MPa, fc=30.2 MPa, E=12 400 MPa, E05=9500 MPa); permanent load duration (KD=0.65); wet service (KSb=0.80, KSc=0.73, KSE=0.833); untreated (KT=1.0).

Find. A rectangular glulam cross-section for column ABC satisfying the CSA O86 combined bending and axial compression check.

AB100 kNCD200 kN100 kN4 m4 m2 m2 m2 m
Figure B2: determinate portal frame, pin at A, roller at D; 100 kN lateral at B, 200 kN & 100 kN vertical on the top beam.

Approach. Reuse the frame analysis from Question B2 (Nf, Mf are the same physical loads, factored the same way). Compute wood design values Fb, Fc with the specified duration/service/treatment factors, then size a trial section by the CSA O86 Cl. 6.5.12 beam-column interaction, checking slenderness (Cc≤50) along the way.

  1. (a) Design forces and material values. As in B2: $$N_f=\boxed{150\text{ kN}},\qquad M_f=\boxed{600\text{ kN}\cdot\text{m}}$$ Factored strengths: $$F_b=f_bK_DK_HK_{Sb}K_T=25.6(0.65)(1.0)(0.80)(1.0)=\boxed{13.31\text{ MPa}}$$ $$F_c=f_cK_DK_HK_{Sc}K_T=30.2(0.65)(1.0)(0.73)(1.0)=\boxed{14.33\text{ MPa}}$$
  2. (b) Trial section and slenderness. The frame sways (roller at D), so take Ke=2.0, same as the cantilever pole of A2; over the full L=8 m, $$L_e=16\,000\text{ mm}$$. Try 365×1140 mm (30 laminations at 38 mm): $$C_c=\frac{L_e}{\min(b,d)}=\frac{16\,000}{365}=\boxed{43.8} \le 50\ \checkmark$$ Axial resistance with the slenderness factor Kc: $$K_c=\left[1+\frac{F_cK_{Zcp}C_c^3}{35E_{05}K_{SE}K_T}\right]^{-1}=0.657,\qquad P_r=\phi_cF_cAK_{Zcp}K_c=0.8(14.33)(416\,100)(1)(0.657)=\boxed{890\text{ kN}}$$
  3. (c) Bending resistance and interaction. Assuming the weak axis is braced by girts (KL=1.0) and taking the size factor conservatively as KZb=0.9: $$M_r=\phi_bF_bSK_{Zb}K_L=0.9(13.31)\left(\frac{365(1140)^2}{6}\right)(0.9)(1.0)=\boxed{853\text{ kN}\cdot\text{m}}$$ Critical buckling load for the amplification term: $$P_E=\frac{\pi^2E_{05}K_{SE}K_TI}{L_e^2}=\boxed{13\,750\text{ kN}}$$ Interaction (CSA O86 Cl. 6.5.12): $$\frac{N_f}{P_r}+\frac{M_f}{M_r(1-N_f/P_E)}=\frac{150}{890}+\frac{600}{853(1-150/13750)}=\boxed{0.88 \le 1.0\ \checkmark}$$
QuantityValue
Nf, Mf150 kN, 600 kN·m
Fb, Fc13.31 MPa, 14.33 MPa
Selected section365×1140 mm glulam (30 laminations)
Cc (slenderness)43.8 (≤50)
Pr, Mr890 kN, 853 kN·m
Interaction ratio0.88

Check: KZb=0.9 and KL=1.0 (fully braced compression edge) are stated assumptions pending the manufacturer’s data for the actual depth selected; CSA O86 Table 6.4.2 wet-service factors should be confirmed against the current edition. The resulting 365×1140 mm member is unusually large for a "farm building" – it reflects the large 100 kN lateral load and 8 m column height given; in practice a designer would revisit knee-bracing or a steel column (Question B2’s frame) before committing to timber at this scale.

Back to the paper →