NivaarExam PrepOfficial exam papers ↗

24-Bld-A5 Building Science · December 2019

Question 3 of 6

Nivaar worked solution (AI-drafted; not reviewed by a licensed engineer)

Notes on this paper

07-Bld-A5 Building Science — National Exam, December 2019. Six problems of 20 marks each were printed; per the paper's own NOTES only the first five in the answer book are graded, but all six are answered below as a complete study resource.

Reference texts: ASHRAE Handbook — Fundamentals (Chapters 1 Psychrometrics, 4 Heat Transfer, 14 Climatic Design Information, 16 Ventilation and Infiltration, 25 Thermal and Water Vapor Transmission Data, 26 Heat, Air, and Moisture Control in Building Assemblies); McQuiston, Parker & Spitler, Heating, Ventilating, and Air Conditioning: Analysis and Design; National Building Code of Canada (NBCC).

Question 3 (20 marks)

Question text not reproduced: the examination questions are © Engineers and Geoscientists BC. Open the official past paper (linked at the top of this page) to read the question, then follow the worked solution below.

Given.

Location, date, time and collector geometry
ParameterValue
Latitude L44° N
Longitude80° W
DateJuly 21 (day 202 of the year)
Time1:00 PM
Collector surface azimuthEast
Collector tilt from horizontal, Σ(i) 45°; (ii) 30°
Check: two inputs are assumed since they were not in the printed data — (1) clock time is taken as solar time (no equation-of-time/longitude correction, the standard simplification at this exam level); (2) ground reflectance ρg = 0.2, the ASHRAE default for ordinary (non-snow) ground.

Find. Total solar irradiation (direct + diffuse + ground-reflected) on the tilted, east-facing collector at the stated time, using the ASHRAE clear-sky model, for tilt 45° and again for tilt 30°.

S (horizon) N collector, 45° 30° faces East sun, 1:00 PM β=63.3° alt φ=32.7° W of S Sun-collector geometry, Toronto 44°N, July 21, 1:00 PM
Lowering the tilt from 45° to 30° turns the east-facing collector further toward the low afternoon sun, cutting its angle of incidence.

Approach. Find the solar position (declination, hour angle, altitude, azimuth) for the stated place/date/time — this is independent of collector tilt — then resolve the angle of incidence and the ASHRAE clear-sky direct, diffuse and ground-reflected components separately for each tilt.

  1. Solar declination for day n = 202 (July 21): $$\delta = 23.45\sin\left(\frac{360(284+n)}{365}\right) = 23.45\sin(479.3^\circ) = 20.44^\circ$$
  2. Hour angle at 1:00 PM, one hour past solar noon (15°/hour): H = 15°.
  3. Solar altitude β, from sinβ = cosL·cosδ·cosH + sinL·sinδ: $$\sin\beta = \cos(44^\circ)\cos(20.44^\circ)\cos(15^\circ) + \sin(44^\circ)\sin(20.44^\circ) = 0.8937 \Rightarrow \boxed{\beta = 63.3^\circ}$$
  4. Solar azimuth φ (from south, +west), from sinφ = cosδ·sinH/cosβ: $$\sin\phi = \frac{\cos(20.44^\circ)\sin(15^\circ)}{\cos(63.3^\circ)} = 0.540 \Rightarrow \phi = 32.7^\circ\ \text{(west of south, afternoon)}$$
  5. Direct-normal irradiation (tilt-independent), ASHRAE clear-sky model, July constants A = 1085 W/m², B = 0.207: $$I_{DN} = \frac{A}{\exp(B/\sin\beta)} = \frac{1085}{\exp(0.207/0.894)} = 861\ \text{W/m}^2$$
  6. (i) Tilt Σ=45°: angle of incidence on the east-facing surface (surface azimuth γ = −90° from south), using $$\cos\theta = \cos\beta\cos(\phi-\gamma)\sin\Sigma + \sin\beta\cos\Sigma$$ $$\cos\theta = \cos(63.3^\circ)\cos(122.7^\circ)\sin(45^\circ) + \sin(63.3^\circ)\cos(45^\circ) = 0.460 \Rightarrow \boxed{\theta = 62.6^\circ}$$
  7. (i) Clear-sky components at Σ=45° (C = 0.136 for July, ρg=0.2): $$I_{DT}=I_{DN}\cos\theta=861\times0.460=396\ \text{W/m}^2,\quad I_{dT}=C\,I_{DN}\frac{1+\cos\Sigma}{2}=0.136\times861\times0.854=100\ \text{W/m}^2$$ $$I_{rT}=I_{DN}(\sin\beta+C)\,\rho_g\,\frac{1-\cos\Sigma}{2}=861\times1.030\times0.2\times0.146=26\ \text{W/m}^2$$ $$\boxed{I_{T,45^\circ} = 396+100+26 = 522\ \text{W/m}^2}$$
  8. (ii) Repeat at Σ=30°. Solar position (β, φ, IDN) is unchanged — only the surface geometry terms change: $$\cos\theta = \cos(63.3^\circ)\cos(122.7^\circ)\sin(30^\circ) + \sin(63.3^\circ)\cos(30^\circ) = 0.653 \Rightarrow \theta = 49.3^\circ$$ $$I_{DT}=861\times0.653=562\ \text{W/m}^2,\quad I_{dT}=0.136\times861\times\frac{1+0.866}{2}=109\ \text{W/m}^2,\quad I_{rT}=861\times1.030\times0.2\times\frac{1-0.866}{2}=12\ \text{W/m}^2$$ $$\boxed{I_{T,30^\circ} = 562+109+12 = 683\ \text{W/m}^2}$$ Reducing the tilt from 45° to 30° INCREASES total irradiation by roughly 161 W/m² (≈31%): the shallower tilt turns the collector's face further from the high overhead sky and more directly toward the still-fairly-low (63.3°-altitude) early-afternoon sun, shrinking θ enough that the gain in direct-beam capture outweighs the small loss in sky-diffuse view factor.
Problem 3 — final results
QuantityΣ=45°Σ=30°
Declination δ / altitude β / azimuth φ20.44° / 63.3° / 32.7° W of S (tilt-independent)
Direct-normal IDN861 W/m² (tilt-independent)
Angle of incidence θ62.6°49.3°
Direct on collector IDT396 W/m²562 W/m²
Diffuse on collector IdT100 W/m²109 W/m²
Ground-reflected IrT26 W/m²12 W/m²
Total irradiation IT522 W/m²683 W/m²