NivaarExam PrepOfficial exam papers ↗

24-Bld-A5 Building Science · December 2019

Question 4 of 6

Nivaar worked solution (AI-drafted; not reviewed by a licensed engineer)

Notes on this paper

07-Bld-A5 Building Science — National Exam, December 2019. Six problems of 20 marks each were printed; per the paper's own NOTES only the first five in the answer book are graded, but all six are answered below as a complete study resource.

Reference texts: ASHRAE Handbook — Fundamentals (Chapters 1 Psychrometrics, 4 Heat Transfer, 14 Climatic Design Information, 16 Ventilation and Infiltration, 25 Thermal and Water Vapor Transmission Data, 26 Heat, Air, and Moisture Control in Building Assemblies); McQuiston, Parker & Spitler, Heating, Ventilating, and Air Conditioning: Analysis and Design; National Building Code of Canada (NBCC).

Question 4 (20 marks)

Question text not reproduced: the examination questions are © Engineers and Geoscientists BC. Open the official past paper (linked at the top of this page) to read the question, then follow the worked solution below.

Given.

Wall assembly and boundary conditions (interior → exterior)
Layer / conditionValue
Concrete slab160 mm, k ≈ 1.7 W/(m·K), μ ≈ 4.5 ng/(s·m·Pa)
Type 3 XPS80 mm, k ≈ 0.029 W/(m·K), μ ≈ 1.5 ng/(s·m·Pa)
Air space30 mm, R ≈ 0.17 m²K/W, μ ≈ 194 ng/(s·m·Pa)
Face brick80 mm, k ≈ 0.9 W/(m·K), μ ≈ 10 ng/(s·m·Pa)
Interior air21 °C, 60% RH
Exterior air−14 °C, 20% RH
Check: the k and vapour-permeability values for concrete, XPS, air space and brick are not printed in the question (very likely a supplied properties table); the figures above are standard ASHRAE Fundamentals Ch. 25/26 values, adopted explicitly. Standard interior/exterior surface film resistances Rsi=0.12, Rso=0.03 m²K/W are used, and surface-film vapour resistance is taken as negligible (the usual Glaser-method simplification).

Find. (i) The steady-state vapour pressure at each material interface; (ii) the relative humidity at each interface; (iii) whether — and where — condensation occurs within the wall.

Concrete 160 mm XPS 80 mm Air space Brick 80 mm Interior Exterior Composite wall cross-section, Problem 4
The moderate interior RH (60%) keeps the whole vapour-pressure profile under the saturation curve.

Approach. Compute the steady-state temperature at each interface from the thermal-resistance chain (Q/A = ΔT/Rtotal), compute the steady-state vapour pressure at each interface from the analogous vapour-resistance chain (w = ΔP/Ztotal), then compare each interface's actual vapour pressure against the saturation pressure at that interface's temperature.

  1. Thermal resistances (R=L/k, plus the airspace's tabulated R): $$R_{conc}=\frac{0.160}{1.7}=0.094,\ R_{xps}=\frac{0.080}{0.029}=2.759,\ R_{air}=0.170,\ R_{brick}=\frac{0.080}{0.9}=0.089\ \ (\text{m}^2\text{K/W})$$ $$R_{total}=R_{si}+R_{conc}+R_{xps}+R_{air}+R_{brick}+R_{so}=0.12+0.094+2.759+0.170+0.089+0.03=3.262\ \text{m}^2\text{K/W}$$
  2. Heat flux and interface temperatures. With ΔT=21−(−14)=35 K, $$q=\frac{35}{3.262}=10.73\ \text{W/m}^2$$ Stepping T = T0 − q·R progressively from the interior: $$T_1(\text{int. surf.})=19.71^\circ\text{C},\ T_2(\text{conc/XPS})=18.70^\circ\text{C},\ T_3(\text{XPS/air})=-10.90^\circ\text{C},\ T_4(\text{air/brick})=-12.72^\circ\text{C},\ T_5(\text{ext. surf.})=-13.68^\circ\text{C}$$ (the chain closes to −14.00°C at the outside air, confirming the resistance bookkeeping).
  3. Vapour resistances, Z=L/μ (m²·s·Pa/ng): $$Z_{conc}=\frac{0.160}{4.5}=0.0356,\ Z_{xps}=\frac{0.080}{1.5}=0.0533,\ Z_{air}=\frac{0.030}{194}=0.00015,\ Z_{brick}=\frac{0.080}{10}=0.0080$$ $$Z_{total}=0.0356+0.0533+0.00015+0.0080=0.0970$$
  4. Boundary vapour pressures (Magnus-Tetens saturation curve, over water for T≥0°C and over ice for T<0°C): $$P_{sat}(21^\circ\text{C})=2482\ \text{Pa}\ \Rightarrow\ P_0 = 0.60\times2482 = 1489\ \text{Pa (interior)}$$ $$P_{sat}(-14^\circ\text{C})=181\ \text{Pa}\ \Rightarrow\ P_6 = 0.20\times181 = 36\ \text{Pa (exterior)}$$
  5. (i) Vapour flux and interface vapour pressures, stepping P = P0−w·Z progressively (surface-film vapour resistance neglected, so P at the interior wall surface equals the room's vapour pressure): $$w=\frac{P_0-P_6}{Z_{total}}=\frac{1489-36}{0.0970}=14\,972\ \text{ng/(s.m}^2\text{)}$$ $$\boxed{P_1(\text{conc/XPS})=957\ \text{Pa},\ \ P_2(\text{XPS/air})=158\ \text{Pa},\ \ P_3(\text{air/brick})=156\ \text{Pa}}$$ (the chain closes to 36 Pa at the exterior, matching P6 and confirming the vapour-resistance bookkeeping).
  6. (ii) Relative humidity at each interface, RH = Pactual/Psat(T):
    Interface temperature, actual vapour pressure and saturation vapour pressure
    InterfaceTPactualPsat(T)RH
    Interior surface19.71 °C1489 Pa2292 Pa65.0%
    Concrete / XPS18.70 °C957 Pa2152 Pa44.5%
    XPS / air space−10.90 °C158 Pa240 Pa66.1%
    Air space / brick−12.72 °C156 Pa203 Pa76.7%
    Exterior surface−13.68 °C36 Pa186 Pa19.4%
  7. (iii) Condensation check. RH stays below 100% at every interface, peaking at 76.7% at the airspace/brick interface — the theoretical vapour-pressure profile never crosses the saturation curve, so no condensation occurs within this wall under these conditions. The result is sensitive to the interior RH assumed: at this wall's moderate 60% interior RH the peak stays comfortably under saturation, but a higher winter humidification set-point would push the same profile over 100% at this same airspace/brick interface, since that is consistently the coldest point at which vapour pressure is still relatively high.
Problem 4 — summary
QuantityValue
Total thermal resistance3.262 m²K/W
Total vapour resistance0.097 m²s·Pa/ng
Peak interface RH76.7% (airspace/brick)
Condensation?No — RH stays below 100% at every interface