NivaarExam PrepOfficial exam papers ↗

23-Chem-A2 Unit Operations and Separation Processes · May 2017

Question 5 of 6: Drying-Rate Curve from Tray-Drying Data

Nivaar worked solution (AI-drafted; not reviewed by a licensed engineer)

Notes on this paper

Paper format. National Exams — 16-CHEM-A2 Unit Operations and Separation Processes, May 2017. 3 hours, open book (one text). Six problems — Part A Unit Operations (A1–A3) and Part B Separation Processes (B1–B3), each worth 25 marks; the rubric asks for at least two problems from each part (only the first two per part are marked). All six are worked below for completeness as a study resource.

Reference texts. McCabe, Smith & Harriott, Unit Operations of Chemical Engineering (7th ed.); Geankoplis, Transport Processes and Separation Process Principles (4th ed.); Coulson & Richardson, Chemical Engineering Vol. 2 (particle technology, filtration, crystallization, drying, absorption); Perry's Chemical Engineers' Handbook (9th ed.); Badger & Banchero, Introduction to Chemical Engineering.

Notes on chart / table reads. A1 uses the ISO nozzle discharge-coefficient chart ($C_n$ vs $Re$, $\beta$); B1's isotherm concentrations are printed as “g/cm³” but are read as g/L (= kg/m³) so the feed concentration (0.25 kg/m³) sits on the same scale as the data — a units slip in the source; B3's equilibrium $Y$ column carries an implied ×10−4 multiplier (the printed integers 0–202 cannot be literal mol/mol, and the inlet gas $Y_1=0.0177$ coincides exactly with the $X=10$ entry of 177, which fixes the scale). Engineering choices are flagged in Check callouts.

Part A — Unit Operations

Question B2: Drying-Rate Curve from Tray-Drying Data (25 marks)

Question text not reproduced: the examination questions are © Engineers and Geoscientists BC. Open the official past paper (linked at the top of this page) to read the question, then follow the worked solution below.

Given.

QuantityValue
Materialsand, tray-dried with superheated steam
Initial total moisture4.57 lb (water) at $t=0$
Final moisture0.00 lb at $t=7.5$ hr
Data spacing0.25 hr early, 0.5 hr late

Find. The drying-rate curve — drying rate $-dW/dt$ as a function of moisture content — and its constant-rate and falling-rate regions.

Drying-rate curve — sand (superheated steam)00.921.842.763.684.600.240.480.720.961.2free moisture W (lb)drying rate −dW/dt (lb/hr)
Figure B2 — Drying-rate curve. Rate is roughly constant (≈0.90 lb/hr) down to a critical moisture near 1.0 lb, then falls steadily toward zero as bound moisture is removed.

Approach. Because the sample dries to zero moisture, the tabulated values are the free water; differentiate the moisture–time data numerically to get the rate, then plot rate against the mean moisture over each interval and read off the constant-rate value and critical moisture.

  1. Compute the drying rate. Over each interval the rate is $$R=-\frac{\Delta W}{\Delta t}.$$ For the first interval, $R=-(4.29-4.57)/0.25=1.12$ lb/hr; the early intervals scatter around a steady value. The interval rates, listed against the mean moisture $\bar W$ of each interval, are:
    $t$ (hr)$\bar W$ (lb)$R$ (lb/hr)$t$ (hr)$\bar W$ (lb)$R$ (lb/hr)
    0–0.254.431.123.75–4.001.070.92
    0.25–0.504.170.964.00–4.250.870.68
    0.50–1.003.95, 3.720.84, 0.964.25–4.500.690.72
    1.00–2.003.49–2.800.92, 1.00, 0.84, 0.924.50–5.000.54, 0.420.48, 0.48
    2.00–3.002.58–1.910.84, 0.92, 0.88, 0.925.00–6.000.31, 0.200.20, 0.24
    3.00–3.751.68–1.290.92, 0.68, 0.846.00–7.500.11, 0.05, 0.010.14, 0.10, 0.04
  2. Constant-rate period. Averaging the flat early region ($0\le t\le4.0$ hr, $W:4.57\rightarrow0.95$) gives $$R_c=\frac{4.57-0.95}{4.0}\approx\boxed{0.90\ \mathrm{lb/hr}}$$ and a least-squares line through the first 17 points gives the same 0.90. The isolated 0.68 at 3.25–3.50 hr is scatter, because the next two intervals return 0.84 and 0.92. Here surface moisture evaporates as fast as it reaches the surface, so the rate is set by external heat/mass transfer, not the solid.
  3. Critical moisture and falling-rate period. The last constant-rate interval ends at $t=4.0$ hr ($W=0.95$ lb; 0.92 lb/hr at $\bar W=1.07$). After it the rate drops to about 0.70 and keeps falling, so the surface can no longer stay wetted below $W_c\approx1.0$ lb. The rate then falls — roughly 0.70→0.48→0.22→0.12→0.04 lb/hr — approaching zero as the last internally-diffusing water leaves. $$\boxed{W_c\approx1.0\ \mathrm{lb}}$$
  4. Assemble the curve. Plotting $R$ against the mean moisture $\bar W$ of each interval (Figure B2) gives the classic drying-rate curve: a horizontal constant-rate plateau at 0.90 lb/hr to the right of $W_c$, then a descending falling-rate branch to the origin. Total water removed is 4.57 lb.
QuantityValue
Constant drying rate $R_c$≈0.90 lb/hr
Critical moisture $W_c$≈1.0 lb (at $t\approx4.0$ hr)
Falling-rate range0.90 → ~0 lb/hr
Total water removed4.57 lb over 7.5 hr
Check: the dry-solids mass and tray area are not supplied, so the drying rate is reported on a per-batch basis (lb water/hr). To convert to a flux $R=-\dfrac{L_s}{A}\dfrac{dX}{dt}$ (lb·hr−1ft−2), divide by the tray area and reference the free moisture per unit dry solid.