NivaarExam PrepOfficial exam papers ↗

23-Chem-A2 Unit Operations and Separation Processes · Undated paper

Question 3 of 6: Pressure Drop through a Bed of Ion-Exchange Resin

Nivaar worked solution (AI-drafted; not reviewed by a licensed engineer)

Notes on this paper

Paper format. National Exams — 16-CHEM-A2 Unit Operations and Separation Processes, May 2019 (this is the “undated” PDF; the cover sheet is a faint template reading MAY, while every interior page reads May 2019). 3 hours, open book. Six problems: Section A (Momentum-transfer / mechanical operations) A1–A3, and Section B (Separation processes) B1–B3, each 25 marks. Candidates attempt at least two from each section and only the first two per section are marked; all six are worked below for completeness.

Reference texts. Geankoplis, Transport Processes and Separation Process Principles (4th ed.) — filtration, packed beds, absorption, adsorption, packed-tower distillation; McCabe, Smith & Harriott, Unit Operations of Chemical Engineering (7th ed.); Coulson & Richardson, Chemical Engineering Vol. 2; Treybal, Mass-Transfer Operations (3rd ed.); Perry's Chemical Engineers' Handbook (9th ed.).

Note on the data. The B1 feed is described as acetone–water but the equilibrium table supplied is explicitly acetone–ethanol — B1 is solved with the data actually provided (acetone–ethanol) and the discrepancy is flagged.


Question A3: Pressure Drop through a Bed of Ion-Exchange Resin (25 marks: a 7.5, b 10, c 7.5)

Question text not reproduced: the examination questions are © Engineers and Geoscientists BC. Open the official past paper (linked at the top of this page) to read the question, then follow the worked solution below.

Given.

QuantityValue
Sieve openings (Table D.1): 20-mesh / 50-mesh0.841 mm / 0.297 mm
Arithmetic-mean particle size $d_p$0.569 mm
Superficial flux (10 gpm/ft²) $\Rightarrow u_s$$6.79\times10^{-3}$ m/s
Published gradient (0.8 psi/ft) $\Rightarrow \Delta P/L$18 096 Pa/m
Water $\mu$ / $\rho$$1\times10^{-3}$ Pa·s / 1000 kg/m³

Find. (a) predicted $\Delta P/L$; (b) $d_p$ for agreement; (c) $\varepsilon$ for agreement.

Packed bed of resin — upward water flow, gradient $\Delta P/L$ $u_s$ = 6.79×10−3 m/s $P_1$ (bottom) $P_2$ (top) $d_p$=0.569 mm $\varepsilon$=0.35
Low Reynolds bed ($Re_p=\rho u_sd_p/\mu\approx3.9$): the viscous (Blake–Kozeny) term of the Ergun equation dominates, so $\Delta P/L\propto (1-\varepsilon)^2/(\varepsilon^3 d_p^2)$.

Approach. Use the Ergun equation; at $Re_p\approx4$ the viscous Blake–Kozeny term controls, so $\Delta P/L$ scales as $1/d_p^2$ and as $(1-\varepsilon)^2/\varepsilon^3$. Predict (a), then invert those scalings for (b) and (c).

  1. Superficial velocity. $10\ \mathrm{gpm/ft^2}=\dfrac{10(3.785\times10^{-3})/60}{0.0929}=6.79\times10^{-3}\ \mathrm{m/s}$; check $Re_p=\rho u_s d_p/\mu=(1000)(6.79\times10^{-3})(5.69\times10^{-4})/10^{-3}=3.9$ — deep in the viscous regime.
  2. (a) Predicted gradient (Blake–Kozeny viscous term of the Ergun equation): $$\frac{\Delta P}{L}=\frac{150\,\mu u_s(1-\varepsilon)^2}{\varepsilon^3 d_p^2}=\frac{150(10^{-3})(6.79\times10^{-3})(0.65)^2}{(0.35)^3(5.69\times10^{-4})^2}=3.1\times10^{4}\ \mathrm{Pa/m}.$$ In field units, $$\frac{\Delta P}{L}=3.1\times10^{4}\times\frac{0.3048}{6895}=\boxed{1.37\ \mathrm{psi/ft}}.$$ The model over-predicts the published 0.8 psi/ft — the real resin is either coarser or more porous than assumed.
  3. (b) Particle size for agreement ($\varepsilon=0.35$ fixed). Since $\Delta P/L\propto 1/d_p^2$ in this regime, $$d_p'=d_p\sqrt{\frac{1.37}{0.8}}=0.569\sqrt{1.714}=0.745\ \mathrm{mm}.$$ Required $d_p\approx0.75$ mm (about a 20–24 mesh equivalent — the bed behaves as if made of larger grains).
  4. (c) Void fraction for agreement ($d_p=0.569$ mm fixed). The porosity group scales the gradient by $(1-\varepsilon)^2/\varepsilon^3$; setting $$\frac{(1-\varepsilon)^2/\varepsilon^3}{(1-0.35)^2/0.35^3}=\frac{0.8}{1.37}$$ and solving gives $\varepsilon\approx0.398$. A modest increase in voidage (0.35 → 0.40) is enough to bring the prediction onto the published value.
PartResult
(a) Predicted $\Delta P/L$ ($d_p=0.569$ mm, $\varepsilon=0.35$)$3.1\times10^{4}$ Pa/m = 1.37 psi/ft
(b) $d_p$ for agreement with 0.8 psi/ft0.745 mm
(c) $\varepsilon$ for agreement with 0.8 psi/ft0.398