23-Chem-A2 Unit Operations and Separation Processes · Undated paper
Question 3 of 6: Pressure Drop through a Bed of Ion-Exchange Resin
Nivaar worked solution (AI-drafted; not reviewed by a licensed engineer)
Notes on this paper
Paper format. National Exams — 16-CHEM-A2 Unit Operations and Separation Processes, May 2019 (this is the “undated” PDF; the cover sheet is a faint template reading MAY, while every interior page reads May 2019). 3 hours, open book. Six problems: Section A (Momentum-transfer / mechanical operations) A1–A3, and Section B (Separation processes) B1–B3, each 25 marks. Candidates attempt at least two from each section and only the first two per section are marked; all six are worked below for completeness.
Reference texts. Geankoplis, Transport Processes and Separation Process Principles (4th ed.) — filtration, packed beds, absorption, adsorption, packed-tower distillation; McCabe, Smith & Harriott, Unit Operations of Chemical Engineering (7th ed.); Coulson & Richardson, Chemical Engineering Vol. 2; Treybal, Mass-Transfer Operations (3rd ed.); Perry's Chemical Engineers' Handbook (9th ed.).
Note on the data. The B1 feed is described as acetone–water but the equilibrium table supplied is explicitly acetone–ethanol — B1 is solved with the data actually provided (acetone–ethanol) and the discrepancy is flagged.
Question A3: Pressure Drop through a Bed of Ion-Exchange Resin (25 marks: a 7.5, b 10, c 7.5)
Published gradient (0.8 psi/ft) $\Rightarrow \Delta P/L$
18 096 Pa/m
Water $\mu$ / $\rho$
$1\times10^{-3}$ Pa·s / 1000 kg/m³
Find. (a) predicted $\Delta P/L$; (b) $d_p$ for agreement; (c) $\varepsilon$ for agreement.
Low Reynolds bed ($Re_p=\rho u_sd_p/\mu\approx3.9$): the viscous (Blake–Kozeny) term of the Ergun equation dominates, so $\Delta P/L\propto (1-\varepsilon)^2/(\varepsilon^3 d_p^2)$.
Approach. Use the Ergun equation; at $Re_p\approx4$ the viscous Blake–Kozeny term controls, so $\Delta P/L$ scales as $1/d_p^2$ and as $(1-\varepsilon)^2/\varepsilon^3$. Predict (a), then invert those scalings for (b) and (c).
Superficial velocity. $10\ \mathrm{gpm/ft^2}=\dfrac{10(3.785\times10^{-3})/60}{0.0929}=6.79\times10^{-3}\ \mathrm{m/s}$; check $Re_p=\rho u_s d_p/\mu=(1000)(6.79\times10^{-3})(5.69\times10^{-4})/10^{-3}=3.9$ — deep in the viscous regime.
(a) Predicted gradient (Blake–Kozeny viscous term of the Ergun equation): $$\frac{\Delta P}{L}=\frac{150\,\mu u_s(1-\varepsilon)^2}{\varepsilon^3 d_p^2}=\frac{150(10^{-3})(6.79\times10^{-3})(0.65)^2}{(0.35)^3(5.69\times10^{-4})^2}=3.1\times10^{4}\ \mathrm{Pa/m}.$$ In field units, $$\frac{\Delta P}{L}=3.1\times10^{4}\times\frac{0.3048}{6895}=\boxed{1.37\ \mathrm{psi/ft}}.$$ The model over-predicts the published 0.8 psi/ft — the real resin is either coarser or more porous than assumed.
(b) Particle size for agreement ($\varepsilon=0.35$ fixed). Since $\Delta P/L\propto 1/d_p^2$ in this regime, $$d_p'=d_p\sqrt{\frac{1.37}{0.8}}=0.569\sqrt{1.714}=0.745\ \mathrm{mm}.$$ Required $d_p\approx0.75$ mm (about a 20–24 mesh equivalent — the bed behaves as if made of larger grains).
(c) Void fraction for agreement ($d_p=0.569$ mm fixed). The porosity group scales the gradient by $(1-\varepsilon)^2/\varepsilon^3$; setting $$\frac{(1-\varepsilon)^2/\varepsilon^3}{(1-0.35)^2/0.35^3}=\frac{0.8}{1.37}$$ and solving gives $\varepsilon\approx0.398$. A modest increase in voidage (0.35 → 0.40) is enough to bring the prediction onto the published value.
Part
Result
(a) Predicted $\Delta P/L$ ($d_p=0.569$ mm, $\varepsilon=0.35$)