23-Chem-A2 Unit Operations and Separation Processes · Undated paper
Question 6 of 6: SO₂ Adsorption Isotherm and Surface Area
Nivaar worked solution (AI-drafted; not reviewed by a licensed engineer)
Notes on this paper
Paper format. National Exams — 16-CHEM-A2 Unit Operations and Separation Processes, May 2019 (this is the “undated” PDF; the cover sheet is a faint template reading MAY, while every interior page reads May 2019). 3 hours, open book. Six problems: Section A (Momentum-transfer / mechanical operations) A1–A3, and Section B (Separation processes) B1–B3, each 25 marks. Candidates attempt at least two from each section and only the first two per section are marked; all six are worked below for completeness.
Reference texts. Geankoplis, Transport Processes and Separation Process Principles (4th ed.) — filtration, packed beds, absorption, adsorption, packed-tower distillation; McCabe, Smith & Harriott, Unit Operations of Chemical Engineering (7th ed.); Coulson & Richardson, Chemical Engineering Vol. 2; Treybal, Mass-Transfer Operations (3rd ed.); Perry's Chemical Engineers' Handbook (9th ed.).
Note on the data. The B1 feed is described as acetone–water but the equilibrium table supplied is explicitly acetone–ethanol — B1 is solved with the data actually provided (acetone–ethanol) and the discrepancy is flagged.
Question B3: SO₂ Adsorption Isotherm and Surface Area (25 marks: a 10, b 6)
Constants: $N_A=6.023\times10^{23}$ mol−1; $\rho_{\text{liq,SO}_2}=1430$ kg/m³; $M_{SO_2}=64.07$ g/mol; molar gas volume at STP = 22 414 cm³/mol.
Find. (a) best-fit isotherm and its constants; (b) total surface area of the adsorbent.
Plotting $p/V$ against $p$ gives a straight line ($R^2=0.997$), confirming the Langmuir isotherm; slope $=1/V_m$ and intercept $=1/(V_m b)$ deliver the constants.
Approach. Test the Langmuir linearization $p/V$ vs $p$ (and compare a Freundlich log–log fit); read $V_m$ and $b$ from the line; then convert the monolayer volume $V_m$ into a molecule count and multiply by the projected area per SO₂ molecule to get the surface area.
(a) Identify the isotherm. Tabulating $p/V$ against $p$ gives a straight line (least squares $R^2=0.997$), whereas a Freundlich $\ln V$ vs $\ln p$ fit is poorer ($R^2=0.993$) and, crucially, has no saturation limit. The data follow the Langmuir isotherm $$V=\frac{V_m\,b\,p}{1+b\,p}\ \Longleftrightarrow\ \frac{p}{V}=\frac{1}{V_m b}+\frac{p}{V_m}.$$
Evaluate the constants. The regression line is $p/V=0.2967\,p+2.252$, so $$V_m=\frac{1}{\text{slope}}=\frac{1}{0.2967}=3.37\ \mathrm{cm^3\,(STP)},\qquad b=\frac{\text{slope}}{\text{intercept}}=\frac{0.2967}{2.252}=0.132\ \mathrm{mmHg^{-1}}.$$ Langmuir: $V_m=3.37\ \mathrm{cm^3(STP)}$, $b=0.132\ \mathrm{mmHg^{-1}}$.
(b) Molecules in the monolayer. The monolayer volume corresponds to $$n_m=\frac{V_m}{22\,414}=\frac{3.37}{22\,414}=1.504\times10^{-4}\ \mathrm{mol}\ \Rightarrow\ 1.504\times10^{-4}\times N_A=9.06\times10^{19}\ \text{molecules}.$$
Projected area per molecule from the liquid density: $$a_m=1.091\left(\frac{M}{\rho_\text{liq}N_A}\right)^{2/3}=1.091\left(\frac{64.07}{1.430\times6.023\times10^{23}}\right)^{2/3}=1.93\times10^{-19}\ \mathrm{m^2}.$$
Total surface area. $$S=(\text{molecules})\times a_m=(9.06\times10^{19})(1.93\times10^{-19})=\boxed{17.4\ \mathrm{m^2}}.$$ Total surface area of the adsorbent sample $\approx 17\ \mathrm{m^2}$.
Quantity
Value
Best-fit isotherm
Langmuir ($R^2=0.997$ > Freundlich 0.993)
Monolayer volume $V_m$
3.37 cm³ (STP)
Langmuir constant $b$
0.132 mmHg−1
Molecules in monolayer
$9.06\times10^{19}$
Projected area per molecule $a_m$
$1.93\times10^{-19}$ m²
Total surface area $S$
17.4 m²
Check. The surface area is the total for the adsorbent charge used in the experiment (the sample mass is not printed, so a per-gram value cannot be quoted). The projected-area prefactor 1.091 assumes hexagonal close packing of spherical molecules in the monolayer, evaluated from the liquid density — the conventional BET/Emmett–Brunauer choice.