NivaarExam PrepOfficial exam papers ↗

23-Chem-A3 Heat and Mass Transfer · May 2013

Question 3 of 7: Humidification of Air Over a Water Container

Nivaar worked solution (AI-drafted; not reviewed by a licensed engineer)

Notes on this paper

National Exams — May 2013 — 04-Chem-A3 Mass Transfer Operations. Three-hour, open-book exam; any non-communicating calculator permitted. Format: seven questions in three parts — answer one of Q1–Q2 (Part A), one of Q3–Q4 (Part B) and two of Q5–Q7 (Part C); four questions constitute a complete paper (Parts A/B carry 20% each, Part C 30% each). All seven are solved below for completeness. Property data are stated in each Given block. Two chart appendices (SI humidity–temperature charts) accompany Q6.

Reference texts: Geankoplis, Transport Processes and Separation Process Principles (4th ed., Prentice Hall) — molecular diffusion, mass-transfer coefficients, absorption, humidification; Welty, Wicks, Wilson & Rorrer, Fundamentals of Momentum, Heat and Mass Transfer (5th/6th ed., Wiley) — transient diffusion, boundary-layer mass transfer; Treybal, Mass-Transfer Operations (3rd ed., McGraw-Hill) — packed-tower and cooling-tower design; supporting data from Perry's Chemical Engineers' Handbook (9th ed.) and Incropera & DeWitt, Fundamentals of Heat and Mass Transfer.

Question 3: Humidification of Air Over a Water Container (Part B — 20%)

Question text not reproduced: the examination questions are © Engineers and Geoscientists BC. Open the official past paper (linked at the top of this page) to read the question, then follow the worked solution below.

Given. Air at $32\,°\text{C}$, 1.0 atm, 25% RH, $u=0.15$ m/s flows over a water surface $L=1.2$ m long; interface at $20\,°\text{C}$. $\nu=1.51\times10^{-5}\ \text{m}^2/\text{s}$, $D_{AB}=2.77\times10^{-5}\ \text{m}^2/\text{s}$; $p_{\text{sat}}(20)=0.02308$ atm, $p_{\text{sat}}(32)=0.04696$ atm.

Find. (a) the average convective mass-transfer coefficient $k_c$; (b) the water evaporation rate per unit width of the container.

water container (interface 20°C, saturated)air: 32°C, 25% RH, u = 0.15 m/s →L = 1.2 mδ_c
Figure 3 — Laminar external flow over a flat liquid surface. A concentration boundary layer grows along the 1.2 m plate; the average Sherwood number gives kc, and the surface-to-bulk concentration difference drives the evaporation.

Approach. Check the flow regime with $Re_L$, obtain the average Sherwood number from the laminar flat-plate correlation, convert to $k_c$, then multiply by the interface-to-bulk water-vapour concentration difference and the plate area per unit width.

  1. Reynolds and Schmidt numbers. $$Re_L=\frac{uL}{\nu}=\frac{(0.15)(1.2)}{1.51\times10^{-5}}=1.19\times10^{4}\;(<5\times10^{5}\Rightarrow\text{laminar}),\qquad Sc=\frac{\nu}{D_{AB}}=0.545.$$
  2. Average Sherwood number and coefficient. For a laminar flat plate, $$\overline{Sh}_L=0.664\,Re_L^{1/2}Sc^{1/3}=0.664(109.2)(0.817)=59.2,$$ $$k_c=\frac{\overline{Sh}_L\,D_{AB}}{L}=\frac{(59.2)(2.77\times10^{-5})}{1.2}=\boxed{1.37\times10^{-3}\ \text{m/s}}.$$
  3. Interface and bulk vapour concentrations (ideal gas). At the surface (saturated at 20 °C) and in the bulk (25% RH at 32 °C), $$c_{As}=\frac{p_{\text{sat}}(20)}{RT_s}=\frac{2338.6}{(8.314)(293.15)}=0.960\ \text{mol/m}^3,\quad c_{A\infty}=\frac{0.25\,p_{\text{sat}}(32)}{RT_\infty}=\frac{1189.6}{(8.314)(305.15)}=0.469\ \text{mol/m}^3.$$
  4. Evaporation per unit width. The flux is $N_A=k_c(c_{As}-c_{A\infty})=1.37\times10^{-3}(0.960-0.469)=6.71\times10^{-4}\ \text{mol}/(\text{m}^2\cdot\text{s})$. Over area $L\times1$ m, $$\dot m_A'=N_A L\,M_{\text{H}_2\text{O}}=(6.71\times10^{-4})(1.2)(0.018015)=\boxed{1.45\times10^{-5}\ \text{kg}/(\text{s}\cdot\text{m})}\;(=8.05\times10^{-4}\ \text{mol}/(\text{s}\cdot\text{m})).$$
QuantityResult
(a) Mass-transfer coefficient, $k_c$$1.37\times10^{-3}$ m/s
Molar flux, $N_A$$6.71\times10^{-4}\ \text{mol}/(\text{m}^2\cdot\text{s})$
(b) Water evaporated per unit width$1.45\times10^{-5}\ \text{kg}/(\text{s}\cdot\text{m})$ ($\approx0.052$ kg/h·m)

Check: surface concentration is evaluated at the interface temperature (20 °C, saturated) and the bulk at 32 °C; using a single film temperature for both shifts the driving force by only a few percent. Laminar flow is confirmed by $Re_L\approx1.2\times10^{4}$.