23-Chem-A5 Chemical Plant Design and Economics · December 2015
Nivaar worked solution (AI-drafted; not reviewed by a licensed engineer)
National Exams — December 2015 — 04-Chem-A5 Chemical Plant Design and Economics. Three-hour, closed-book exam; one two-sided aid sheet and an approved calculator permitted. Six equally weighted (20-mark) questions are posed and the candidate answers any five; only the first five are marked. All six are answered below for completeness. Question 1 is a conceptual flowsheet-synthesis question (hydrodealkylation of toluene to benzene) answered with a process flow sheet and organised prose; questions 2, 3 and 6 are numerical (capacity-scaled and index-escalated plant cost, yield-improvement rate of return, and evaporator heat-transfer area); questions 4 and 5 are qualitative essays on materials selection against the common corrosion mechanisms and on process-hazard classification.
Reference texts: M.S. Peters, K.D. Timmerhaus & R.E. West, Plant Design and Economics for Chemical Engineers (5th ed., McGraw-Hill) — the exam's named primary text (cost estimation Ch. 6, interest and profitability Ch. 7–10, materials of construction Ch. 12, plant safety and loss prevention Ch. 3); J.M. Douglas, Conceptual Design of Chemical Processes (McGraw-Hill) — the hydrodealkylation (HDA) flowsheet-synthesis case study used in Question 1; R. Turton et al., Analysis, Synthesis, and Design of Chemical Processes (4th ed., Prentice Hall) — flowsheet synthesis and equipment cost correlations; AIChE, Dow’s Fire & Explosion Index Hazard Classification Guide (7th ed.) — the process-hazard checklist behind Question 5; supporting Canadian practice from CCOHS/WHMIS 2015, the Canadian Environmental Protection Act (CEPA), and CSA/ASME materials and pressure-vessel codes.
Question text not reproduced: the examination questions are © Engineers and Geoscientists BC. Open the official past paper (linked at the top of this page) to read the question, then follow the worked solution below.
This is the classic hydrodealkylation (HDA) flowsheet-synthesis problem of Douglas. The answer is built in Douglas’s hierarchical order: fix the input–output structure from the stoichiometry, then the recycle structure, then the separation train — the whole separation being dictated by the very wide spread of boiling points the question supplies.
The desired reaction consumes one H2 per toluene and makes one benzene and one methane; the reversible side reaction dimerises benzene to diphenyl and releases H2. Because methane is produced (and enters with the makeup hydrogen), and hydrogen is fed in large excess, the gas phase accumulates light components (H2, CH4) that must leave the process — this forces a gas purge. The two feeds are pure toluene and a 95/5 H2/CH4 gas; the products are benzene (99.97 %), a fuel-gas purge, and diphenyl.
Toluene conversion per pass is deliberately kept low (to hold selectivity to benzene and suppress diphenyl), so unreacted toluene is recycled. Hydrogen is fed at a 5:1 ratio to suppress coking, far in excess of stoichiometry, so unreacted hydrogen gas is recycled with a slip-stream purge to reject the methane made in the reactor and brought in with the feed. Two recycles (a gas loop and a liquid toluene loop) and one purge therefore fall directly out of the stoichiometry and the coking constraint.
The boiling points span an enormous range: H2 (−253) and CH4 (−162) are permanent gases at any reasonable separation temperature, whereas benzene (80), toluene (111) and diphenyl (255) are readily condensable liquids. That single fact sets the whole train:
Several genuine design choices arise, and a complete answer weighs them: