NivaarExam PrepOfficial exam papers ↗

23-Chem-A5 Chemical Plant Design and Economics · December 2015

Question 5 of 6: Process Hazards

Nivaar worked solution (AI-drafted; not reviewed by a licensed engineer)

Notes on this paper

National Exams — December 2015 — 04-Chem-A5 Chemical Plant Design and Economics. Three-hour, closed-book exam; one two-sided aid sheet and an approved calculator permitted. Six equally weighted (20-mark) questions are posed and the candidate answers any five; only the first five are marked. All six are answered below for completeness. Question 1 is a conceptual flowsheet-synthesis question (hydrodealkylation of toluene to benzene) answered with a process flow sheet and organised prose; questions 2, 3 and 6 are numerical (capacity-scaled and index-escalated plant cost, yield-improvement rate of return, and evaporator heat-transfer area); questions 4 and 5 are qualitative essays on materials selection against the common corrosion mechanisms and on process-hazard classification.

Reference texts: M.S. Peters, K.D. Timmerhaus & R.E. West, Plant Design and Economics for Chemical Engineers (5th ed., McGraw-Hill) — the exam's named primary text (cost estimation Ch. 6, interest and profitability Ch. 7–10, materials of construction Ch. 12, plant safety and loss prevention Ch. 3); J.M. Douglas, Conceptual Design of Chemical Processes (McGraw-Hill) — the hydrodealkylation (HDA) flowsheet-synthesis case study used in Question 1; R. Turton et al., Analysis, Synthesis, and Design of Chemical Processes (4th ed., Prentice Hall) — flowsheet synthesis and equipment cost correlations; AIChE, Dow’s Fire & Explosion Index Hazard Classification Guide (7th ed.) — the process-hazard checklist behind Question 5; supporting Canadian practice from CCOHS/WHMIS 2015, the Canadian Environmental Protection Act (CEPA), and CSA/ASME materials and pressure-vessel codes.

Question 5: Process Hazards (20 marks)

Question text not reproduced: the examination questions are © Engineers and Geoscientists BC. Open the official past paper (linked at the top of this page) to read the question, then follow the worked solution below.

The two lists are the General Process Hazards and Special Process Hazards of the Dow Fire & Explosion Index (F&EI), the standard method for ranking the loss potential of a process unit. (The paper as printed contains two slips, reproduced verbatim in the box above: the stem reads “the magnitude of the following an incident,” and part (b) again asks for “twelve general process hazard factors.” The paragraph immediately above (b) defines special process hazards, and the Dow index has exactly six general and twelve special factors, so (b) is answered as the Special Process Hazards — stated here as an assumption under NOTE 1 of the paper.)

(a) Six General Process Hazards

These set the base factor — the general energy character of the process:

  1. Exothermic chemical reactions — the reaction itself releases energy (e.g. oxidation, polymerisation, hydrogenation).
  2. Endothermic processes — units that must be supplied energy (calcination, cracking, pyrolysis), where loss of heat control is a hazard.
  3. Material handling and transfer — loading, unloading, conveying and warehousing of flammable/reactive material.
  4. Enclosed or indoor process units — confinement that prevents dispersion of a leak.
  5. Access — adequacy of emergency access to the unit for fire-fighting and escape.
  6. Drainage and spill control — the ability to contain and divert spills and fire-fighting water away from the unit.

(b) Twelve Special Process Hazards

These raise the probability and severity of an incident for the specific unit:

  1. Toxic materials — they complicate and delay emergency response.
  2. Sub-atmospheric pressure — risk of drawing air into a system that must exclude it.
  3. Operation in or near the flammable range — process or storage that can enter the explosive envelope on upset.
  4. Dust explosion — finely divided solids that can deflagrate.
  5. Relief pressure (elevated operating pressure) — higher pressure increases leak rate and stored energy.
  6. Low temperature — risk of brittle fracture of carbon steel.
  7. Quantity of flammable/unstable material — the inventory in process and in storage that could feed a fire.
  8. Corrosion and erosion — wall thinning that leads to loss of containment.
  9. Leakage — joints and packing — flanges, seals and glands as leak sources.
  10. Use of fired equipment — furnaces and heaters providing a ready ignition source.
  11. Hot-oil heat-exchange system — large inventories of combustible heat-transfer fluid above their flash point.
  12. Rotating equipment — large pumps, compressors and agitators as mechanical failure and leak points.
Check: the six general and twelve special hazards are the exact penalty categories of the Dow F&EI (7th ed.); together with the material factor they yield the unit’s Fire & Explosion Index. In Canadian practice this quantitative ranking supports, but does not replace, the hazard identification required under provincial OH&S and the CSA Z767 process-safety-management framework.