NivaarExam PrepOfficial exam papers ↗

23-Chem-A5 Chemical Plant Design and Economics · December 2018

Question 6 of 6: Abatement Scheme for Acetone in Dryer Off-Gas

Nivaar worked solution (AI-drafted; not reviewed by a licensed engineer)

Notes on this paper

National Exams — December 2018 — 16-Chem-A5 Chemical Plant Design and Economics. Three-hour, closed-book exam; one two-sided aid sheet and an approved Sharp/Casio calculator permitted. Six equally weighted (20-mark) questions are posed and the candidate answers any five; only the first five are marked. All six are answered below for completeness. Question 1 is a process-synthesis flowsheet (catalytic propane dehydrogenation), Question 2 is a numerical discounted-cash-flow (DCFROR) minimum-selling-price calculation, and Questions 3–6 are qualitative design/economics essays (pilot-plant investigation, technical design factors, economic design factors, and a solvent-emission abatement scheme).

Reference texts: M.S. Peters, K.D. Timmerhaus & R.E. West, Plant Design and Economics for Chemical Engineers (5th ed., McGraw-Hill) — the exam's named primary text (pilot plants Ch. 3, general design considerations and plant-location factors Ch. 2–3, interest/depreciation/profitability Ch. 7–10); R.K. Sinnott & G. Towler, Chemical Engineering Design (Coulson & Richardson vol. 6) — economic analysis, cash-flow/DCFROR and flowsheeting; R. Smith, Chemical Process Design and Integration (2nd ed., Wiley) — reaction–separation–recycle structure; supporting Canadian practice from CCOHS, provincial OH&S regulation and Environment and Climate Change Canada air-emission guidance.

Question 6: Abatement Scheme for Acetone in Dryer Off-Gas (20 marks)

Question text not reproduced: the examination questions are © Engineers and Geoscientists BC. Open the official past paper (linked at the top of this page) to read the question, then follow the worked solution below.

Given / Find. A nitrogen dryer off-gas, saturated with water and acetone at 75–90 °C and near atmospheric pressure, must be treated so the discharged nitrogen contains <200 ppm acetone. The task is to propose a justified process scheme (an abatement and solvent-recovery train), not a numerical design.

Condenser(chilled)WaterScrubberActivated-carbonAdsorberDistillation(recover acetone)dryer off-gasN2+H2O+acetone75-90 Ccooled gasscrubbed gasclean N2<200 ppmrecycle/ventcondensateacetone-wateracetone recoveredreuse
Figure 6.1 — Proposed abatement/recovery train for the nitrogen dryer off-gas: chilled condensation (bulk removal) → water scrubber (deep removal) → activated-carbon adsorber (polish to <200 ppm), with condensate and scrub liquor sent to distillation for acetone recovery and the nitrogen recycled to the dryer.

Proposed scheme. A three-stage recovery-plus-polish train on the dryer off-gas, with the nitrogen recycled in a closed loop:

  1. Chilled condensation (bulk removal). Cool the 75–90 °C saturated gas against chilled water/refrigerant. Most of the water and the bulk of the acetone condense out, sharply lowering the acetone loading before any polishing step. This recovers the majority of the solvent as a liquid at the lowest cost and shrinks every downstream unit.
  2. Water scrubbing / absorption (deep removal). Contact the cooled gas counter-currently with water in a packed absorber. Acetone is completely miscible with water and highly soluble, so a modest water rate strips it to a few hundred ppm or below; this is the workhorse step that brings the gas near the 200 ppm limit.
  3. Activated-carbon adsorption (final polish). Pass the scrubbed gas through an activated-carbon bed to adsorb the residual acetone and guarantee compliance below 200 ppm even during scrubber upsets. The bed is regenerated (steam or hot inert gas), and the desorbed acetone is returned to recovery.

Solvent recovery and nitrogen recycle. The condensate and the acetone-rich scrubber liquor are sent to a distillation column that recovers acetone overhead (reused in the process) and returns clean water to the scrubber. The polished nitrogen is recycled back to the dryer in a closed loop, with a small make-up and purge.

Reasons for selection. The scheme exploits acetone's key properties: it is fully water-miscible and highly soluble, so water absorption is cheap and effective; it is volatile, so condensation and steam-regenerable carbon both work well; and it is flammable (lower flammable limit ≈ 2.5 vol%), which is exactly why nitrogen—an inert—is used as the drying medium and why the nitrogen is recycled in a closed loop rather than vented: keeping oxygen out prevents a flammable acetone/air mixture and recovers the valuable, costly nitrogen. Staging the units from cheap bulk removal (condensation) through deep removal (scrubbing) to a guaranteed polish (carbon) minimises the size and cost of the expensive final stage while ensuring the <200 ppm limit is always met; recovering the acetone by distillation turns an emissions problem into a solvent-recovery credit.

Check: the exact split between the three stages depends on the acetone loading (fixed by the dryer solvent rate and the 75–90 °C saturation) and on the achievable chilled-condensation temperature; a full design would set the condenser temperature, the scrubber water rate and stages, and the carbon-bed cycle from a mass balance and the acetone–water vapour–liquid equilibrium. If solvent recovery were not economic, a thermal/catalytic oxidiser could replace stages 2–3, but it destroys (rather than recovers) the acetone and burns the nitrogen loop's inert blanket, so recovery is preferred here.
Back to the paper →