NivaarExam PrepOfficial exam papers ↗

23-Chem-A6 Process Dynamics and Control · May 2018

Question 2 of 8: Feedback Loop — Closed-Loop Transfer Function and Sensor-Gain Stability Range

Nivaar worked solution (AI-drafted; not reviewed by a licensed engineer)

Notes on this paper

Reference texts: D. E. Seborg, T. F. Edgar, D. A. Mellichamp & F. J. Doyle III, Process Dynamics and Control (4th ed., Wiley) — Laplace-domain modelling, linearisation, transfer functions, feedback stability, frequency response and IMC design; G. Stephanopoulos, Chemical Process Control: An Introduction to Theory and Practice (Prentice Hall) — Routh test, Nyquist criterion, state-space models and dead-time systems; D. R. Coughanowr & S. E. LeBlanc, Process Systems Analysis and Control (3rd ed., McGraw-Hill) — first-order tank/thermal dynamics, step/ramp response and block-diagram algebra. Standard control conventions (deviation variables; unity valve/sensor gains unless stated) are used throughout. This sitting is an open-book paper of eight problems of which any five constitute a complete exam; all eight are solved here.

Problem 2: Feedback Loop — Closed-Loop Transfer Function and Sensor-Gain Stability Range (20%)

Question text not reproduced: the examination questions are © Engineers and Geoscientists BC. Open the official past paper (linked at the top of this page) to read the question, then follow the worked solution below.

Given. A single-loop feedback system with a proportional controller and a first-order sensor:

ElementTransfer function
Controller$G_c=K_c=1$
Process$G_1(s)=\dfrac{2}{(5s+1)(3s+1)}$
Sensor (measurement)$G_2(s)=\dfrac{-k_2}{10s+1}$

Find. (1) $C(s)/R(s)$ in terms of $K_c,G_1,G_2$; (2) the values of $k_2$ giving a stable closed loop.

R +− Kc G_1 C G_2 measured variable
Problem 2: standard single-loop feedback. The sensor $G_2$ sits in the feedback path; its measurement is subtracted from the set-point $R$, and the error drives $K_c$ then the process $G_1$.

Approach. Reduce the loop to $C/R=K_cG_1/(1+K_cG_1G_2)$; the denominator set to zero gives the characteristic polynomial, and a third-order Routh test bounds $k_2$.

  1. (1) Closed-loop transfer function. With forward path $K_cG_1$ and feedback $G_2$, block-diagram algebra gives $$\boxed{\frac{C(s)}{R(s)}=\frac{K_cG_1(s)}{1+K_cG_1(s)G_2(s)}.}$$
  2. (2) Characteristic equation. Set $1+K_cG_1G_2=0$ with $K_c=1$. Here $G_1G_2=\dfrac{2}{(5s+1)(3s+1)}\cdot\dfrac{-k_2}{10s+1}=\dfrac{-2k_2}{(5s+1)(3s+1)(10s+1)}$, so $$(5s+1)(3s+1)(10s+1)-2k_2=0.$$
  3. Expand the polynomial. $(5s+1)(3s+1)=15s^2+8s+1$; multiplying by $(10s+1)$: $$150s^3+95s^2+18s+(1-2k_2)=0.$$
  4. Routh test (third order). For $a_0s^3+a_1s^2+a_2s+a_3$ with $a_0=150,\,a_1=95,\,a_2=18,\,a_3=1-2k_2$, stability requires every coefficient positive and $a_1a_2>a_0a_3$: $$1-2k_2>0\ \Rightarrow\ k_2<0.5,\qquad 95(18)>150(1-2k_2)\ \Rightarrow\ 1710>150-300k_2.$$
  5. Solve the inequalities. The second gives $300k_2>150-1710=-1560$, i.e. $k_2>-5.2$. Combining, $$\boxed{-5.2<k_2<0.5.}$$ At $k_2=0.5$ the constant term vanishes (a root through the origin); at $k_2=-5.2$ the $s^1$ Routh entry vanishes (an imaginary-axis crossing, sustained oscillation).
QuantityValue
(1) Closed-loop TF$C/R=K_cG_1/(1+K_cG_1G_2)$
Characteristic polynomial$150s^3+95s^2+18s+(1-2k_2)$
(2) Stable range of $k_2$$-5.2<k_2<0.5$