23-Chem-B2 Environmental Engineering · December 2019
Nivaar worked solution (AI-drafted; not reviewed by a licensed engineer)
National Exam 16-Chem-B2, Environmental Engineering — December 2019. 3 hours, Closed-Book Exam with a candidate-prepared 8½×11" double-sided aid sheet. Any five (5) of the seven questions constitute a complete paper (100 marks); all seven are solved below for completeness.
Reference texts: Metcalf & Eddy (Tchobanoglous, Burton, Stensel), Wastewater Engineering: Treatment and Reuse, 4th ed.; Davis & Cornwell, Introduction to Environmental Engineering, 5th ed.; Turner, Workbook of Atmospheric Dispersion Estimates, 2nd ed.; Cooper & Alley, Air Pollution Control: A Design Approach, 4th ed.
Question text not reproduced: the examination questions are © Engineers and Geoscientists BC. Open the official past paper (linked at the top of this page) to read the question, then follow the worked solution below.
| Technology | Example application | Key process design parameter |
|---|---|---|
| (a) pH control | Neutralizing low-pH industrial (e.g. metal-finishing) wastewater with lime or caustic soda before biological treatment. | Reagent dose set from the wastewater's titration (buffering) curve, not just its raw pH, because alkalinity/acidity determines how much reagent is actually needed to shift the pH into the target range. |
| (b) Ion exchange | Softening a hard groundwater supply by exchanging Ca₂⁺/Mg₂⁺ for Na⁺ on a strong-acid cation resin. | Resin exchange capacity (equivalents of hardness removable per unit resin volume before breakthrough), which sets the bed volume and regeneration (brine) frequency for a given raw-water hardness and flow. |
| (c) Reverse osmosis | Desalinating brackish groundwater or polishing tertiary wastewater effluent for potable reuse. | Operating pressure relative to the feedwater's osmotic pressure — the applied pressure must exceed the osmotic pressure of the (increasingly concentrated) reject stream by enough net driving pressure to sustain the target permeate flux across the membrane. |
Given.
| Quantity | Value |
|---|---|
| Flow, Q₀ | 200,000 m³/d |
| Influent BOD₅, S₀ | 250 mg/L |
| Effluent BOD₅, S | 10 mg/L |
| Yield coefficient, Y | 0.4 |
| Decay rate, kd | 0.05 d⁻¹ |
| MLSS, X | 5,000 mg/L |
| Waste MLSS, Xw | 12,000 mg/L |
| Mean cell residence time, θc | 8 d |
Find. (a) Aeration tank volume V (m³) and HRT θ (h). (b) Sludge wasted daily Qw (kg/d). (c) Recycle ratio Qr/Q₀.
Approach. Classic Lawrence–McCarty design-SRT formulation: a biomass steady-state mass balance over the aeration tank + clarifier at the fixed target SRT gives the tank volume directly, the net biomass production sets the daily wasted-sludge mass, and a solids balance at the aeration-tank inlet gives the recycle ratio.
| Quantity | Value |
|---|---|
| Aeration tank volume, V | 21,943 m³ |
| Hydraulic retention time, θ | 2.63 h |
| Sludge wasted daily, Px | 13,714 kg/d |
| Recycle ratio, Qr/Q₀ | 0.71 |